ZTE Axon 40 SE vs. ZTE Axon 30 5G: A Head-to-Head Comparison

ZTE has been steadily carving out a niche in the smartphone market, offering compelling devices at competitive prices. The Axon 40 SE and Axon 30 5G represent different points in their product evolution. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide which one best suits your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The ZTE Axon 30 5G is the clear winner, boasting a significantly more powerful Snapdragon 870 chipset, faster 65W charging, and a brighter display. While the Axon 40 SE might be more budget-friendly, the Axon 30 5G offers a superior overall experience.

PHONES
Phone Names ZTE Axon 40 SE ZTE Axon 30 5G
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 28, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 18, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - Europe
5G bands-1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Europe
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G
 -1, 3, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA - China
Launch
Announced2022, October 202021, July 27
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, October 25Available. Released 2021, August 03
Body
Build-Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame
Dimensions163.5 x 75.8 x 7.6 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.30 in)170.2 x 77.8 x 7.8 mm (6.70 x 3.06 x 0.31 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight182 g (6.42 oz)189 g (6.67 oz)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)1080 x 2460 pixels (~400 ppi density)
Size6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio)6.92 inches, 107.0 cm2 (~80.8% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLEDAMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz
 -Always-on display
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585)
ChipsetUnisoc UMS512T T618 (12 nm)Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm)
GPUMali-G52 MP2Adreno 650
OSAndroid 12, MyOS 12Android 11, MyOS 11
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal128GB 4GB RAM128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM
 -UFS 3.1
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaDual-LED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad-64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Single8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), under display
Triple50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens-
Video1080p@30fps4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, HDR, 10‑bit video
Selfie camera
Features-HDR
Single8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), under display
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesNo
35mm jackYesNo
Loudspeaker YesYes
 -24-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.1, A2DP, LE
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioUnspecifiedNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 3.0, OTG
WLANYesWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging22.5W wired65W wired, PD, QC4
TypeLi-Ion 4500 mAhLi-Ion 4200 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlue, BlackBlack, Aqua
Models9047A2322, A2322G
PriceAbout 300 EURAbout 500 EUR
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 86h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -27.7 LUFS (Good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 701991 (v9) GeekBench: 3160 (v5.1) GFXBench: 59fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

ZTE Axon 40 SE

  • More affordable
  • Decent battery life (86h endurance)
  • Lightweight design (assumed)

  • Weaker chipset (Unisoc T618)
  • Slower charging (22.5W)
  • Likely less vibrant display
  • Lower camera performance (assumed)

ZTE Axon 30 5G

  • Powerful Snapdragon 870 chipset
  • Fast 65W charging
  • Brighter display (438 nits)
  • Likely better camera performance
  • Excellent battery life (86h endurance)

  • Higher price
  • Potentially larger and heavier (assumed)

Display Comparison

The Axon 30 5G's display shines with a measured 438 nits of brightness and an impressive (though nominal) infinite contrast ratio, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Axon 40 SE's display is likely adequate but lacks the same level of visual fidelity. Expect a more immersive viewing experience on the Axon 30 5G.

Camera Comparison

While both phones offer photo and video capabilities, the Axon 30 5G's Snapdragon 870 likely provides better image processing and overall camera performance. Expect improved low-light performance and more detailed photos from the Axon 30 5G. Specific camera specs are missing for both, but the chipset advantage is significant.

Performance

Here's where the Axon 30 5G truly pulls ahead. Its Snapdragon 870 chipset is a powerhouse, delivering significantly faster performance for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications. The Axon 40 SE's Unisoc T618 is a budget chipset, suitable for everyday tasks but struggling with heavier workloads.

Battery Life

Both phones boast an impressive endurance rating of 86 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. However, the Axon 30 5G's 65W charging is a game-changer, allowing for significantly faster charging times compared to the Axon 40 SE's 22.5W wired charging.

Buying Guide

The ZTE Axon 40 SE is a good option for users on a tight budget who prioritize affordability and basic functionality. The ZTE Axon 30 5G is ideal for those seeking a smoother performance, faster charging, and a better camera experience, even if it comes at a slightly higher price.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the ZTE Axon 40 SE good for gaming?
The Axon 40 SE's Unisoc T618 chipset is not ideal for demanding games. It can handle lighter titles, but you may experience lag or reduced graphics settings in more intensive games.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge the ZTE Axon 30 5G?
With its 65W charging, the ZTE Axon 30 5G can typically fully charge in around 35-45 minutes, depending on usage and conditions.