ZTE Axon 30 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro: A Deep Dive into Snapdragon 888 Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its significantly faster wired *and* wireless charging, coupled with reverse wireless charging capabilities, provides a tangible advantage in daily usability. While the Axon 30 Pro offers a competitive experience, the Mi 11 Pro’s charging ecosystem is a clear differentiator.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE Axon 30 Pro 5G | Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 4, 12, 17, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 - China |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 15 | 2021, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 26 | Available. Released 2021, April 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.3 x 7.9 mm (6.44 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 164.3 x 74.6 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~515 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~91.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, MyOS 11 | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 64 MP, f/2.4, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/1.12", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, 120mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.4, 16mm, 123˚ (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10‑bit video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ rec. |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired, QC4 | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 36 min 67W wireless, 100% in 39 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Pink | Black, Green, Purple |
| Models | A2022 | M2102K1AC |
| Price | About 400 EUR | About 370 EUR |
ZTE Axon 30 Pro 5G
- Competitive price point
- Snapdragon 888 performance
- QC4 fast charging support
- Slower charging speeds compared to Mi 11 Pro
- No wireless charging
- Limited information on display and camera specs
Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro
- Industry-leading 67W wired and wireless charging
- Reverse wireless charging capability
- Likely superior camera system (based on brand reputation)
- Potentially higher price
- Snapdragon 888 can run warm under sustained load
- Software experience may be more feature-rich but also more bloated
Display Comparison
Both phones utilize AMOLED panels, but detailed display specs beyond the chipset are unavailable. However, given Xiaomi’s history with high-end displays, the Mi 11 Pro likely boasts a higher peak brightness and potentially a more refined color calibration. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests a standard 120Hz refresh rate, impacting battery efficiency compared to adaptive refresh rate displays. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, reflecting flagship design trends.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are unavailable beyond the chipset. However, Xiaomi typically prioritizes camera performance in its 'Pro' models. The Mi 11 Pro likely features a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. While both phones likely offer capable camera systems, the Mi 11 Pro’s reputation suggests a more versatile and higher-quality photographic experience, particularly in low-light conditions. The absence of information regarding OIS and lens apertures prevents a more granular comparison.
Performance
Both the ZTE Axon 30 Pro 5G and Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro are powered by the Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) chipset, featuring the same Octa-core CPU configuration (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78, 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55). Performance will be largely identical in CPU-bound tasks. Thermal management, however, is a potential differentiator. Xiaomi’s larger chassis in the Mi 11 Pro may provide a slight advantage in dissipating heat during sustained workloads, potentially mitigating throttling compared to the Axon 30 Pro. Both likely utilize LPDDR5 RAM, but the speed (e.g., LPDDR5X) is unknown.
Battery Life
The battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the charging capabilities are a major point of divergence. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro boasts 67W wired charging, achieving a full charge in 36 minutes, alongside 67W wireless charging (39 minutes) and 10W reverse wireless charging. The ZTE Axon 30 Pro 5G offers 55W wired charging with QC4 support. While 55W is respectable, it’s significantly slower than the Mi 11 Pro’s 67W wired and wireless options. The Mi 11 Pro’s wireless charging and reverse wireless charging capabilities are features absent on the Axon 30 Pro, offering substantial convenience for users invested in the wireless charging ecosystem.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Axon 30 Pro 5G if you prioritize a more streamlined software experience and are less reliant on extremely fast charging. It’s a solid performer for the price. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro if you demand the fastest possible charging speeds – both wired and wireless – and appreciate the added convenience of reverse wireless charging. It’s ideal for power users and those who frequently share battery life with others.