ZTE Axon 30 Pro 5G vs. vivo X70 Pro+: A Deep Dive into Snapdragon 888 Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo X70 Pro+ emerges as the superior choice. The Snapdragon 888+ offers a slight performance edge, coupled with a more versatile camera system and the convenience of 50W wireless charging. However, the Axon 30 Pro remains a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers prioritizing value.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE Axon 30 Pro 5G | vivo X70 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 4, 12, 17, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 15 | 2021, September 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 26 | Available. Released 2021, September 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.3 x 7.9 mm (6.44 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 164.5 x 75.2 x 8.9 mm (6.48 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 209 g / 213 g (7.37 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, MyOS 11 | Android 11, Funtouch OS 12 (International), OriginOS 1.0 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 64 MP, f/2.4, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF, gimbal OIS |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10‑bit video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 32-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired, QC4 | 55W wired 50W wireless Reverse wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4200 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Pink | Black, Blue, Orange |
| Models | A2022 | V2145A, V2114 |
| Price | About 400 EUR | About 720 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 84h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 837833 (v9) GeekBench: 3469 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE Axon 30 Pro 5G
- More affordable price point
- Fast 55W wired charging
- Powerful Snapdragon 888 processor
- Lacks wireless charging
- Less advanced camera system (based on available data)
vivo X70 Pro+
- Snapdragon 888+ for slightly improved performance
- 50W wireless charging and reverse charging
- Likely superior camera system
- Higher price tag
- Snapdragon 888+ can still experience throttling
Display Comparison
The provided data lacks detailed display specifications for either device. However, given the vivo X70 Pro+'s positioning, it likely features a higher-quality panel with potentially better color accuracy and peak brightness. The 'Infinite' contrast ratio claim for the vivo suggests a strong OLED implementation. The ZTE Axon 30 Pro, while likely also OLED, may prioritize cost savings in this area. Without specific nit ratings or color gamut coverage, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the X70 Pro+ likely offers a more visually immersive experience.
Camera Comparison
The vivo X70 Pro+ clearly distinguishes itself with a more comprehensive camera system, though specific details are missing. The absence of sensor size or aperture information for either device hinders a precise comparison. However, vivo’s reputation for camera innovation suggests a more sophisticated image processing pipeline and potentially larger sensors. The Axon 30 Pro likely offers a capable camera experience, but the X70 Pro+ is positioned as a photography-focused flagship. The lack of detail on the Axon 30 Pro’s camera makes it difficult to assess its capabilities beyond basic expectations for a flagship.
Performance
Both phones utilize the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888, but the vivo X70 Pro+ boasts the Snapdragon 888+, a slightly refined version clocked at 3.0 GHz versus the Axon 30 Pro’s 2.84 GHz. This 160 MHz clock speed increase, while not massive, translates to marginally faster processing speeds, particularly in sustained workloads. Both devices feature the same CPU core configuration (1x Cortex-X1, 3x Cortex-A78, 4x Cortex-A55). The X70 Pro+’s advantage is likely more noticeable in demanding games and applications. Both will benefit from LPDDR5 RAM, though the specific speed isn't provided. Thermal management will be crucial; the 888 series is known to throttle under prolonged stress, and the X70 Pro+'s slightly more efficient chip *may* mitigate this, but real-world testing is needed.
Battery Life
Both devices support 55W wired charging, offering comparable charging speeds – likely achieving a full charge in under an hour. However, the vivo X70 Pro+ adds 50W wireless charging and reverse wireless/wired charging capabilities, providing significant convenience. The X70 Pro+ also boasts an endurance rating of 84 hours, suggesting optimized power management. While the Axon 30 Pro’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the X70 Pro+'s endurance rating indicates a more efficient overall power consumption profile, despite the added features.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Axon 30 Pro 5G if you need a high-performance phone at a significantly lower price point and aren't heavily reliant on wireless charging or an exceptionally advanced camera system. Buy the vivo X70 Pro+ if you prioritize camera versatility, faster wireless charging, and a slightly more refined overall experience, even at a higher cost.