ZTE Axon 30 Pro 5G vs Sony Xperia 1 III: Which Snapdragon 888 Flagship Reigns Supreme?

Both the ZTE Axon 30 Pro 5G and the Sony Xperia 1 III represent compelling, albeit different, approaches to the flagship smartphone experience. While both are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G chipset, they diverge significantly in areas like display technology, charging speeds, and overall feature set, making a direct comparison crucial for discerning buyers.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing value and rapid charging, the ZTE Axon 30 Pro 5G emerges as the winner. Its 55W charging significantly outperforms the Xperia 1 III’s 30W, and it delivers comparable performance at a potentially lower price point. However, Sony’s focus on multimedia and camera control will appeal to a niche audience.

PHONES
Phone Names ZTE Axon 30 Pro 5G Sony Xperia 1 III
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 4, 12, 17, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66 - Europe
5G bands1, 3, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Europe
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
 CDMA 800 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA (specific)
Launch
Announced2021, April 152021, April 14
StatusAvailable. Released 2021, April 26Available. Released 2021, August 25
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame
Dimensions163.6 x 75.3 x 7.9 mm (6.44 x 2.96 x 0.31 in)165 x 71 x 8.2 mm (6.50 x 2.80 x 0.32 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight186 g (6.56 oz)186 g / 187.1 g (mmWave) (6.56 oz)
 -IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)1644 x 3840 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~643 ppi density)
Size6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.2% screen-to-body ratio)6.5 inches, 98.6 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR BT.2020
 -Runs at 1096 x 2560 pixels except for select use cases
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm)Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm)
GPUAdreno 660Adreno 660
OSAndroid 11, MyOS 11Android 11, upgradable to Android 13
Memory
Card slotNomicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM
 UFS 3.1UFS 3.X
Main Camera
FeaturesDual-LED flash, panorama, HDRZeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR, eye tracking
Quad64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 64 MP, f/2.4, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens-
Single16 MP, (wide)8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4", 1.12µm
Triple-12 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.7", 1.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.3, 70mm (telephoto), f/2.8, 105mm (telephoto), 1/2.9", dual pixel PDAF, 3x/4.4x optical zoom, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 124˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.6", dual pixel PDAF 0.3 MP, TOF 3D, (depth)
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10‑bit video4K@24/25/30/60/120fps HDR, 1080p@30/60/120fps; 5-axis gyro-EIS, OIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR
Single16 MP, (wide)8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps1080p@30fps, 5-axis gyro-EIS
Sound
3.5mm jack NoYes
35mm jackNoYes
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
 24-bit/192kHz audio24-bit/192kHz audio Dynamic vibration system
Comms
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.1, OTGUSB Type-C 3.1, OTG, video output
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass
 -Native Sony Alpha camera support
Battery
Charging55W wired, QC430W wired, PD, 50% in 30 min Wireless Reverse wireless
TypeLi-Po 4200 mAhLi-Po 4500 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, PinkFrosted Black, Frosted Gray, Frosted Purple
ModelsA2022XQBC62/V, XQBC52V.UKCX, SO-51B, SOG03, A101SO, XQ-BC62, XQ-BC72, XQ-BC52, XQ-BC01, XQ-BC11, XQ-BC21, XQ-BC72
PriceAbout 400 EUR€ 505.26 / $ 903.43
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 82h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -26.5 LUFS (Good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 607423 (v8) GeekBench: 3515 (v5.1) GFXBench: 54fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

ZTE Axon 30 Pro 5G

  • Significantly faster 55W charging
  • Potentially better thermal management due to larger size
  • Likely more affordable price point

  • Missing display brightness data
  • Less emphasis on multimedia features

Sony Xperia 1 III

  • Higher peak display brightness (620 nits)
  • Wireless and reverse wireless charging
  • Sony’s renowned camera software and manual controls

  • Slower 30W charging
  • Higher price point
  • Snapdragon 888 throttling potential

Display Comparison

The Sony Xperia 1 III boasts a 620 nit peak brightness, a figure that suggests superior visibility in direct sunlight compared to the Axon 30 Pro 5G (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize high-quality OLED panels, Sony’s emphasis on color accuracy and its 'Creator Mode' caters to content creators. The Xperia 1 III’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) is standard for OLED, but the lack of specific refresh rate data for the Axon 30 Pro 5G leaves a question mark regarding smoothness. The Xperia 1 III’s 21:9 aspect ratio is geared towards video consumption, while the Axon 30 Pro 5G likely adopts a more conventional ratio.

Camera Comparison

Both phones are advertised as having strong photo and video capabilities, but the specifics are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture data, a direct comparison is difficult. Sony’s history suggests a focus on natural color reproduction and extensive manual controls, appealing to photography enthusiasts. The Axon 30 Pro 5G may lean towards more processed images, aiming for wider appeal. The absence of detail regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device makes it impossible to assess low-light performance differences.

Performance

Both devices are equipped with the Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) chipset, featuring an Octa-core CPU configuration (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78, 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55). This means raw processing power will be largely identical. However, thermal management could differentiate the experience. The Axon 30 Pro 5G’s larger size *potentially* allows for a more robust cooling solution, mitigating the Snapdragon 888’s known tendency to throttle under sustained load. RAM specifications are missing for both, but LPDDR5 is expected, with the Xperia 1 III potentially benefitting from faster LPDDR5X.

Battery Life

Both the ZTE Axon 30 Pro 5G and the Sony Xperia 1 III share an endurance rating of 82h, suggesting similar overall battery life. However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The Axon 30 Pro 5G supports 55W wired charging with QC4, promising significantly faster top-ups than the Xperia 1 III’s 30W wired charging with PD, which achieves 50% charge in 30 minutes. The Xperia 1 III also offers wireless and reverse wireless charging, features absent on the Axon 30 Pro 5G, providing added convenience.

Buying Guide

Buy the ZTE Axon 30 Pro 5G if you need a fast-charging, high-performance phone that doesn’t break the bank. It’s ideal for power users who demand quick top-ups and don’t want to compromise on processing power. Buy the Sony Xperia 1 III if you prioritize a premium multimedia experience, manual camera controls, and a more refined software experience, and are willing to pay a premium for those features.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 888 in either phone tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 888 is known to generate heat under sustained load. While both phones share the same chipset, the ZTE Axon 30 Pro 5G’s potentially larger chassis *could* offer better thermal dissipation, mitigating throttling. However, without detailed thermal testing, it’s difficult to say definitively.
❓ How does the charging speed of the ZTE Axon 30 Pro 5G compare to the Sony Xperia 1 III in real-world usage?
The ZTE Axon 30 Pro 5G’s 55W charging is significantly faster than the Xperia 1 III’s 30W charging. While Sony claims 50% charge in 30 minutes, the Axon 30 Pro 5G should achieve a full charge in a similar timeframe, offering a substantial convenience advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
❓ Is the 21:9 aspect ratio of the Sony Xperia 1 III beneficial for all types of content?
The 21:9 aspect ratio is primarily optimized for widescreen video content, providing a cinematic viewing experience. However, it can result in letterboxing (black bars) when viewing content in standard 16:9 formats, and may require apps to be specifically optimized for the wider screen.