ZTE Axon 30 Pro 5G vs. Google Pixel 6 Pro: A Detailed Comparison of Flagship Androids

The ZTE Axon 30 Pro 5G, initially a high-value contender, now faces a compelling alternative in the Google Pixel 6 Pro. While the Axon 30 Pro leverages the established Snapdragon 888, the Pixel 6 Pro introduces Google’s custom Tensor chip, prioritizing AI and machine learning. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which phone delivers the best experience for your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Google Pixel 6 Pro emerges as the superior choice. Its Tensor chip, coupled with Google’s software optimization, provides a smoother, more intelligent experience, and its camera system is demonstrably more capable. However, the Axon 30 Pro remains a strong contender for those prioritizing raw performance and faster charging at a potentially lower price.

PHONES
Phone Names ZTE Axon 30 Pro 5G Google Pixel 6 Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 4, 12, 17, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GLUOG, G8VOU
5G bands1, 3, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G8VOU
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G
 CDMA 800 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GLUOG
Launch
Announced2021, April 152021, October 19
StatusAvailable. Released 2021, April 26Available. Released 2021, October 28
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame
Dimensions163.6 x 75.3 x 7.9 mm (6.44 x 2.96 x 0.31 in)163.9 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.99 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + eSIM
Weight186 g (6.56 oz)210 g (7.41 oz)
 -IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density)
Size6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.2% screen-to-body ratio)6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+
 -Always-on display
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm)Google Tensor (5 nm)
GPUAdreno 660Mali-G78 MP20
OSAndroid 11, MyOS 11Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM
 UFS 3.1UFS 3.1
Main Camera
FeaturesDual-LED flash, panorama, HDRLaser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama
Quad64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 64 MP, f/2.4, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens-
Single16 MP, (wide)11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm
Triple-50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 104mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 4x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10‑bit video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR, panorama
Single16 MP, (wide)11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps
Sound
3.5mm jack NoNo
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
 24-bit/192kHz audio-
Comms
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5)
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.1, OTGUSB Type-C 3.1
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
 -Ultra Wideband (UWB) support
Battery
Charging55W wired, QC423W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless
TypeLi-Po 4200 mAhLi-Ion 5003 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, PinkCloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black
ModelsA2022GLUOG, G8VOU, GF5KQ
PriceAbout 400 EUR€ 199.99 / $ 204.99 / £ 275.00 / ₹ 29,699
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 84h
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Performance- AnTuTu: 585485 (v8), 719815 (v9) GeekBench: 2831 (v5.1) GFXBench: 39 fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

ZTE Axon 30 Pro 5G

  • Faster 55W wired charging
  • Potentially stronger GPU performance for gaming
  • Often available at a lower price point

  • Less sophisticated camera software
  • May experience more thermal throttling
  • Less consistent software updates

Google Pixel 6 Pro

  • Superior camera performance and AI features
  • Smoother software experience with Google’s optimizations
  • Long-term software support from Google

  • Slower 23W wired charging
  • Tensor chip may not match Snapdragon 888 in raw GPU power
  • Higher initial price

Display Comparison

The Pixel 6 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 846 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the Axon 30 Pro. While both offer excellent viewing experiences, the Pixel 6 Pro’s infinite (nominal) contrast ratio suggests deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. The Pixel 6 Pro’s display is also likely to benefit from LTPO technology, enabling variable refresh rates for improved power efficiency, a feature not confirmed on the Axon 30 Pro. Bezels are comparable, but the Pixel 6 Pro’s curved display edges contribute to a more premium feel.

Camera Comparison

The Pixel 6 Pro’s camera system is a clear differentiator. While specific sensor details for the Axon 30 Pro are missing, the Pixel 6 Pro’s computational photography prowess, driven by the Tensor chip, delivers superior image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. Google’s image processing excels in dynamic range and detail preservation. The Pixel 6 Pro’s advanced features like Magic Eraser and Motion Mode further enhance its photographic capabilities. The Axon 30 Pro likely offers a competent camera experience, but lacks the software sophistication of the Pixel.

Performance

Both phones utilize an octa-core CPU configuration with Cortex-X1 prime cores, but differ in their supporting cores and chipsets. The Axon 30 Pro’s Snapdragon 888 features a 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, built on a 5nm process. The Pixel 6 Pro’s Google Tensor uses 2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1, 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, also on a 5nm process. While clock speeds are similar, the Tensor chip’s focus on AI and machine learning tasks gives it an edge in areas like image processing and voice recognition. The Snapdragon 888 is known for its strong GPU performance, potentially benefiting gamers, but may exhibit more thermal throttling under sustained load.

Battery Life

Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 84 hours, suggesting comparable battery life in typical usage scenarios. However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The Axon 30 Pro supports 55W wired charging with QC4, enabling significantly faster charging times than the Pixel 6 Pro’s 23W wired charging (PD3.0, 50% in 30 min). The Pixel 6 Pro compensates with 23W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, features absent on the Axon 30 Pro. The faster wired charging of the Axon 30 Pro is a boon for users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery.

Buying Guide

Buy the ZTE Axon 30 Pro 5G if you prioritize raw CPU and GPU power for demanding games and applications, and value the inclusion of 55W fast charging for quick top-ups. Buy the Google Pixel 6 Pro if you prefer a more refined software experience, exceptional camera capabilities powered by AI, and long-term software support directly from Google, even if it means slightly slower charging.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 888 in the Axon 30 Pro overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 888 is known to generate heat under sustained load. While the Axon 30 Pro includes cooling solutions, users may experience some throttling during prolonged gaming, potentially leading to reduced frame rates. The Pixel 6 Pro’s Tensor chip, while not a gaming powerhouse, is generally more efficient and less prone to overheating.
❓ How does the Google Tensor chip's AI processing benefit everyday use on the Pixel 6 Pro?
Google’s Tensor chip excels in AI-driven tasks, enhancing features like voice recognition, live translation, and camera performance. This translates to faster and more accurate voice commands, improved noise cancellation during calls, and significantly better image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. The Tensor chip also enables features like Magic Eraser, which removes unwanted objects from photos.
❓ Is the 55W charging on the Axon 30 Pro significantly faster in real-world use?
Yes, 55W charging is considerably faster than the Pixel 6 Pro’s 23W charging. The Axon 30 Pro can typically charge from 0% to 100% in under an hour, while the Pixel 6 Pro takes considerably longer. This makes the Axon 30 Pro a better choice for users who prioritize quick charging.