ZTE Axon 30 5G vs. Axon 40 Pro: A Head-to-Head Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Axon 30 5G edges out the Axon 40 Pro due to its significantly longer battery life (86h endurance rating vs. unknown for the 40 Pro) and potentially a brighter display. While both share the same powerful processor, the Axon 30's endurance makes it the more practical choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE Axon 30 5G | ZTE Axon 40 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - Europe |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 18, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - Europe | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Europe |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Europe | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA - China | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - ROW | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 27 | 2022, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 03 | Available. Released 2022, May 31 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 170.2 x 77.8 x 7.8 mm (6.70 x 3.06 x 0.31 in) | 162.9 x 72.9 x 8.7 mm (6.41 x 2.87 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.92 inches, 107.0 cm2 (~80.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Always-on display | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, MyOS 11 | Android 12, MyOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), under display | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, HDR, 10‑bit video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), under display | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, PD, QC4 | 65W wired, PD, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Ion 4200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Aqua | Dream black, Crystal blue, Gold |
| Models | A2322, A2322G | A2023G, A2023 |
| Price | About 500 EUR | About 410 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 86h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -27.7 LUFS (Good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 701991 (v9) GeekBench: 3160 (v5.1) GFXBench: 59fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
ZTE Axon 30 5G
- Exceptional battery life (86h endurance)
- Potentially older design
- Camera specs unknown
ZTE Axon 40 Pro
- Potentially more modern design (assumed)
- Snapdragon 870 5G
- Unknown battery life
- Camera specs unknown
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar OLED displays, but the Axon 30 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 438 nits, suggesting a potentially better outdoor visibility. The contrast ratio of 'Infinite' on the Axon 30 is nominal and doesn't provide concrete information. The Axon 40 Pro's display details are missing, making a direct comparison difficult.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are incomplete for both phones. However, given ZTE's focus on camera technology, it's likely the Axon 40 Pro may have camera improvements. Without detailed specs, it's impossible to definitively compare image quality or video capabilities.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Snapdragon 870 5G chipset and the same CPU configuration, guaranteeing smooth performance for everyday tasks, gaming, and multitasking. Differences in RAM and storage (not specified) could slightly impact real-world performance, but the core processing power is identical.
Battery Life
This is where the Axon 30 5G shines. Its impressive endurance rating of 86 hours significantly surpasses the unknown battery performance of the Axon 40 Pro. This suggests the Axon 30 5G offers substantially longer battery life.
Buying Guide
The ZTE Axon 30 5G is ideal for users prioritizing battery life and a potentially brighter display. The Axon 40 Pro might appeal to those seeking a slightly more modern design (assuming it has design improvements not reflected in the provided specs) and are less concerned about extended battery performance.