ZTE Axon 20 5G vs Oppo Find X2 Neo: A Deep Dive into Battery, Performance, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity, the Oppo Find X2 Neo emerges as the winner. Its 100-hour endurance rating surpasses the Axon 20 5G’s 82 hours, offering a noticeable advantage for all-day use. While both phones share the same chipset, the Find X2 Neo’s superior battery performance makes it the more practical choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE Axon 20 5G | Oppo Find X2 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 - Europe | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 78 SA/NSA - Europe | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 78 NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G 3.7/1.6 Gbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 28, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 01. Released 2020, September 10 | 2020, April 15. Released 2020, May 21 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back, plastic frame | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 172.1 x 77.9 x 8 mm (6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 in) | 159.4 x 72.4 x 7.7 mm (6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.92 inches, 107.0 cm2 (~79.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz | AMOLED, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ) |
| Always-on display | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, MiFavor 10.5 | Android 10, ColorOS 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 53mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.2", 1.4µm 2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, HDR, 10‑bit video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), under display | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, QC4, 60% in 30 min | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 4220 mAh | Li-Po 4025 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Blue, Purple, Sunrise Yellow | Moonlight Black, Starry Blue |
| Models | A2121, A2121E, A2121G | CPH2009 |
| Price | About 720 EUR | About 240 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 82h | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.3 LUFS (Good) | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 320399 (v8) GeekBench: 1957 (v5.1) GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 308231 (v8) GeekBench: 1815(v5.1) GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE Axon 20 5G
- Potentially lower price point
- Snapdragon 765G provides solid performance
- Supports 30W fast charging
- Lower battery endurance (82h)
- Lower peak display brightness (406 nits)
- Limited camera details available
Oppo Find X2 Neo
- Superior battery life (100h endurance)
- Faster charging (50% in 20 min)
- Oppo's optimized software experience
- May be slightly more expensive
- Shares the same Snapdragon 765G chipset
- Limited camera details available
Display Comparison
Both the ZTE Axon 20 5G and Oppo Find X2 Neo feature displays with an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks typical of OLED panels. However, the Axon 20 5G’s measured peak brightness of 406 nits is a key differentiator. While adequate for indoor use, it may struggle in direct sunlight compared to displays with higher peak brightness. The lack of specific display technology details (LTPO, refresh rate) for either phone makes a detailed comparison difficult, but both likely target a standard 60Hz refresh rate given the chipset and price point.
Camera Comparison
The provided data only indicates 'Photo / Video' capabilities for both devices, lacking crucial details like sensor size, aperture, or OIS. Given the market positioning, it’s reasonable to assume both phones feature multi-camera setups with a primary sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. However, without specific sensor information, a meaningful camera comparison is impossible. It's likely Oppo's image processing algorithms will deliver more consistently pleasing results, leveraging their established expertise in smartphone photography.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime, 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver). This means CPU performance will be virtually identical. The real-world performance difference will likely stem from RAM management and software optimization, areas where Oppo generally excels. Thermal throttling, while not a major concern with the 765G, could be slightly better managed on the Find X2 Neo due to Oppo’s refined cooling solutions.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X2 Neo’s 100-hour endurance rating significantly surpasses the ZTE Axon 20 5G’s 82-hour rating. This translates to a tangible difference in real-world usage, allowing the Find X2 Neo to comfortably last a full day, even with moderate to heavy use. Both phones support 30W wired charging, but the Find X2 Neo achieves 50% charge in 20 minutes, while the Axon 20 5G takes 30 minutes to reach 60%. This faster charging speed on the Oppo provides a convenient top-up option when time is limited.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Axon 20 5G if you prioritize a lower initial cost and are comfortable with slightly less battery life. It’s a solid option for users who don’t heavily rely on their phones throughout the day. Buy the Oppo Find X2 Neo if you value extended battery life and faster charging, making it ideal for power users, travelers, or anyone who frequently finds themselves away from a charger.