ZTE Axon 11 SE 5G vs Motorola Moto G 5G: Which 5G Phone Wins?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a slightly faster charging experience, the ZTE Axon 11 SE 5G emerges as the winner. Its Mediatek Dimensity 800 chipset, built on a 7nm process, provides a performance edge over the Motorola Moto G 5G’s Snapdragon 750G, despite the Motorola’s slightly faster 20W charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE Axon 11 SE 5G | Motorola Moto G 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, June 01. Released 2020, June 22 | 2020, November 05. Released 2020, December 07 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.7 x 76.3 x 8.8 mm (6.41 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) | 166.1 x 76.1 x 9.9 mm (6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57MP4 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10, MiFavor 10.1 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 2GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 2 MP (macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio, RDS |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, 50% in 30 min | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Aurora Glamour, Aurora Glacier | Volcanic Gray, Frosted Silver |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 90 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 131h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1419:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.1 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 312461 (v8) GeekBench: 1980 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE Axon 11 SE 5G
- More efficient Dimensity 800 chipset
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Faster CPU architecture (Cortex-A76)
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Display specifications largely unknown
Motorola Moto G 5G
- Brighter display (484 nits)
- Faster charging (20W)
- Excellent battery endurance (131h)
- Less efficient Snapdragon 750G chipset
- Potentially more thermal throttling
Display Comparison
Both phones share a contrast ratio of 1419:1, indicating similar levels of black depth and color vibrancy. However, the Motorola Moto G 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 484 nits, offering better visibility in direct sunlight. While the ZTE Axon 11 SE 5G’s display specifications are not provided, the Moto G 5G’s brightness advantage is a tangible benefit for outdoor users. Neither manufacturer details panel technology (OLED vs LCD) or refresh rates, suggesting both likely utilize standard 60Hz LCD panels common in this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the prevalence of larger sensors in ZTE’s higher-end devices suggests the Axon 11 SE 5G *may* have a slight edge in low-light photography. The absence of details regarding image processing algorithms further complicates the assessment. It’s safe to assume both phones will offer acceptable image quality for social media sharing, but neither is likely to compete with flagship camera systems.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the ZTE Axon 11 SE 5G utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 800 (7nm) while the Motorola Moto G 5G features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G (8nm). The Dimensity 800’s 7nm fabrication process generally translates to better power efficiency and thermal performance compared to the 8nm Snapdragon 750G. The CPU architecture also differs; the Dimensity 800 employs Cortex-A76 cores for its performance cluster, known for their strong single-core performance, while the Snapdragon 750G uses Kryo 570 cores. The Snapdragon 750G’s CPU clock speeds (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) are slightly higher on paper, but the Dimensity 800’s architecture and process node likely provide a more sustained performance advantage in demanding tasks.
Battery Life
Both the ZTE Axon 11 SE 5G and Motorola Moto G 5G achieve an endurance rating of 131 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, charging speeds differ: the Motorola Moto G 5G supports 20W wired charging, while the ZTE Axon 11 SE 5G is limited to 18W. This means the Moto G 5G can replenish its battery slightly faster, reaching 50% charge in a shorter timeframe. The ZTE Axon 11 SE 5G is advertised to reach 50% in 30 minutes, but the Moto G 5G should be quicker.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Axon 11 SE 5G if you need a phone that handles demanding applications and multitasking with greater ease, and if you value a more efficient processor. Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G if you prioritize long battery endurance and a slightly brighter display, and are less concerned with pushing the phone to its performance limits with graphically intensive games or apps.