Both the ZTE Axon 11 5G and the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly crowded mid-range 5G smartphone market. The Axon 11 5G, leveraging the Snapdragon 765G, aimed for a balance of performance and features, while the Mi 10T Lite 5G, with the Snapdragon 750G, prioritized efficiency and fast charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a slightly brighter display, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G is the better choice. However, those seeking a potentially more robust CPU performance for demanding tasks will find the ZTE Axon 11 5G a more suitable option.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE (3CA), 5G (2+ Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, March 23. Released 2020, March 30 | 2020, September 30. Released 2020, October 13 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.2 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 165.4 x 76.8 x 9 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 168 g (5.93 oz) | 214.5 g (7.58 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.47 inches, 102.8 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10, MiFavor 10 | Android 10, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | 64GB 6GB RAM - UFS 2.1
128GB 6GB RAM - UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC4 | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4820 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White, Black | Atlantic Blue, Pearl Gray, Rose Gold Beach |
| Models | A2021, A2021G, A2021L, A2021E | M2007J17G |
| Price | About 490 EUR | About 190 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 116h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1368:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 318882 (v8)
GeekBench: 2009 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE Axon 11 5G
- Potentially stronger CPU performance due to higher clocked prime core.
- Snapdragon 765G offers a proven track record.
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds.
- Slower 18W charging.
- Display brightness data unavailable, potentially inferior outdoor visibility.
- Limited information on camera sensor specifications.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
- Faster 33W wired charging for quicker top-ups.
- Brighter display (596 nits) for better outdoor visibility.
- More efficient Snapdragon 750G chipset.
- Slightly lower CPU clock speed compared to Axon 11 5G.
- Camera details are limited.
- May not match the Axon 11 5G in sustained peak performance.
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 596 nits, offering superior visibility in direct sunlight compared to the Axon 11 5G (brightness data unavailable). Both displays share a 1368:1 contrast ratio, indicating similar levels of black depth and color pop. However, without PWM dimming rate data for the Axon 11 5G, it's difficult to assess potential eye strain for sensitive users, a factor where the Mi 10T Lite 5G may have an advantage if it employs a higher frequency.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics on sensor size, aperture, or OIS, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the market positioning of both phones suggests a focus on versatility rather than flagship-level image quality. The absence of details regarding image processing algorithms further complicates the assessment; Xiaomi’s typically leans towards vibrant, saturated images, while ZTE’s approach is less defined.
Performance
The ZTE Axon 11 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, built on a 7nm process, featuring a Kryo 475 Prime core clocked at 2.4GHz. This contrasts with the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G’s Snapdragon 750G (8nm), which has two Kryo 570 cores at 2.2GHz. While the 750G benefits from a newer, more efficient 8nm node, the 765G’s higher clocked prime core suggests a potential edge in single-core performance, impacting app launch speeds and responsiveness. The 750G’s architecture is optimized for 5G efficiency, potentially leading to better battery life during 5G usage.
Battery Life
Both the ZTE Axon 11 5G and the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G achieve an endurance rating of 116 hours, suggesting comparable overall battery life. However, the Mi 10T Lite 5G’s 33W wired charging significantly outperforms the Axon 11 5G’s 18W QC4 charging. This translates to a much faster 0-100% charge time for the Mi 10T Lite 5G, a crucial advantage for users who prioritize convenience and minimal downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Axon 11 5G if you frequently engage in multitasking, light gaming, or applications that benefit from a slightly more powerful CPU core configuration. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G if you value fast charging, a brighter screen for outdoor visibility, and a longer-lasting battery experience with less concern for sustained peak performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 750G in the Mi 10T Lite 5G throttle under sustained gaming loads?
The Snapdragon 750G is designed for efficiency, and while it can handle gaming, it may exhibit some throttling during extended, graphically intensive sessions. The 8nm process helps mitigate this, but it won't match the sustained performance of higher-end chipsets. Expect playable frame rates, but potentially with some dips over longer periods.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the ZTE Axon 11 5G noticeably slow compared to the 33W on the Mi 10T Lite 5G?
Yes, the difference is significant. 18W charging will take considerably longer to fully charge the Axon 11 5G, potentially adding several hours to your charging time compared to the Mi 10T Lite 5G. This is a key advantage for the Mi 10T Lite 5G, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ How does the 5G performance differ between the Snapdragon 765G and 750G?
The Snapdragon 750G is specifically optimized for 5G connectivity, offering improved power efficiency when utilizing 5G networks. While both chips support 5G, the 750G is likely to provide slightly better battery life during 5G usage, making it a more efficient choice for heavy 5G users.
