ZTE Axon 10s Pro 5G vs. vivo X50 Pro+: A Deep Dive into Snapdragon 865 Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and potentially superior camera capabilities, the vivo X50 Pro+ is the stronger choice. While the ZTE Axon 10s Pro 5G offers a compelling value proposition, the X50 Pro+'s 44W charging and reported endurance rating give it a practical edge.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE Axon 10s Pro 5G | vivo X50 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 / 1900 & TD-SCDMA | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, February 06 | 2020, June 01. Released 2020, July 11 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front, eco leather back or glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.2 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 158.5 x 73 x 8.8 mm (6.24 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 192.2 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.47 inches, 102.8 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, HDR10 | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, MiFavor 10 | Android 10, Funtouch 10.5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 32 MP, f/2.1, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/3.4", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 28mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 20 MP, f/2.2, 125˚, 16mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 32-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC4 Wireless (Qi) | 44W wired, 62% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 4000 mAh, non-removable | 4350 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black | Blue, Brown |
| Models | - | V2011A |
| Price | - | About 630 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 93h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 621433 (v8) GeekBench: 3411 (v5.1) GFXBench: 43fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE Axon 10s Pro 5G
- More affordable price point
- Supports Qi wireless charging
- Capable Snapdragon 865 performance
- Slow 18W charging
- Potentially less advanced camera system
- Missing details on display specs (refresh rate, brightness)
vivo X50 Pro+
- Significantly faster 44W charging
- Potentially superior camera performance
- Longer reported battery endurance
- Higher price tag
- No mention of wireless charging support
- Missing details on display specs (refresh rate, brightness)
Display Comparison
Both devices boast displays with an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels likely achieved through OLED technology. However, specific details like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. The lack of information on refresh rates is also notable; the market trend at the time favored 90Hz or 120Hz panels, and the absence of this spec on either device is a potential drawback compared to competitors. Bezels are likely comparable given the similar overall design philosophies of maximizing screen real estate.
Camera Comparison
The vivo X50 Pro+ is positioned as a camera-centric device, though specific sensor details are lacking in the provided data. The mention of 'Photo / Video' suggests a focus on both still and moving image capture. The absence of detailed sensor specifications makes a direct comparison difficult, but the X50 Pro+ likely features a more advanced camera system overall, potentially including larger sensors and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro 5G likely offers a competent camera experience, but it's unlikely to match the X50 Pro+'s capabilities. Ignoring the likely inclusion of 2MP macro/depth sensors on both devices, the main sensor and image processing pipeline are the critical factors.
Performance
Both the ZTE Axon 10s Pro 5G and the vivo X50 Pro+ are powered by the Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+). This means they share the same CPU configuration: an octa-core setup with 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Performance will be largely identical in CPU-bound tasks. The key differentiator will be thermal management. The X50 Pro+’s larger chassis *potentially* allows for a more robust cooling solution, mitigating throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. RAM configurations are not specified, but LPDDR5 is expected on both, contributing to fast application loading and multitasking.
Battery Life
Both devices report an endurance rating of 93 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the lack of specific mAh capacities. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro 5G supports 18W wired charging with Quick Charge 4 (QC4) and Qi wireless charging. The vivo X50 Pro+ boasts a significantly faster 44W wired charging capability, capable of reaching 62% charge in just 30 minutes. This difference in charging speed is a major advantage for the X50 Pro+, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Axon 10s Pro 5G if you need a capable 5G phone on a tighter budget and aren't overly concerned with the absolute fastest charging speeds. Buy the vivo X50 Pro+ if you prioritize camera performance, faster charging (44W vs 18W), and are willing to pay a premium for those features. Both are excellent choices for media consumption and gaming, but the X50 Pro+ caters to the power user.