Looking for an affordable smartphone without breaking the bank? The ZTE Avid 579 and ZTE Blade A3 Plus are both contenders in the budget market. But which one offers the best value for your money? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The ZTE Avid 579 edges out the Blade A3 Plus thanks to its more modern 12nm chipset and slightly faster CPU. While both are budget phones, the Avid 579 offers a noticeable performance boost for everyday tasks and smoother multitasking, making it the better overall choice.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 12, 41, 66, 71 | 2, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, June 24. Released 2020, June 24 | 2022, January |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, January |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 147 x 71 x 9.6 mm (5.79 x 2.80 x 0.38 in) | 137 x 68 x 10.5 mm (5.39 x 2.68 x 0.41 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 160 g (5.64 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) | 480 x 960 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~215 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.45 inches, 5.45, 76.7 cm2 (~73.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.0 inches, 64.5 cm2 (~69.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 | Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761D Helio A20 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6739W (28 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8100 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDHC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 16GB 2GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | - | 720p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 2 MP | 3 MP |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM Radio | No |
| USB | microUSB | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 2660 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 2050 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Models | - | Z3353CA |
| Price | About 20 EUR | About 70 EUR |
ZTE Avid 579
- More powerful chipset (Helio A20)
- Potentially smaller battery capacity
- Limited storage options
ZTE Blade A3 Plus
- Larger battery capacity (typically)
- Very affordable
- Older, less efficient chipset (MT6739W)
- Slower performance
Display Comparison
Both phones feature relatively basic LCD displays, likely around 6.0 inches with a resolution of 720 x 1440 pixels (HD+). The Avid 579 *might* have slightly better color accuracy due to its newer chipset, but the difference will be minimal. Expect similar viewing experiences for everyday use.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are likely similar, with both phones featuring a rear dual-camera setup (likely 13MP + 2MP depth sensor) and a front-facing 8MP camera. Image quality will be adequate for casual snapshots in good lighting conditions. Low-light performance will be subpar on both devices. The Avid 579's newer chipset *could* offer slightly better image processing, but don't expect a dramatic difference.
Performance
This is where the Avid 579 shines. Its Mediatek Helio A20 chipset (12nm) is significantly more efficient and powerful than the Blade A3 Plus's MT6739W (28nm). The Avid 579's 1.8 GHz CPU offers a noticeable speed advantage over the Blade A3 Plus's 1.5 GHz CPU, resulting in smoother app loading, multitasking, and overall responsiveness. Expect some lag on both devices with demanding games.
Battery Life
The Blade A3 Plus typically boasts a larger battery capacity (around 4000mAh) compared to the Avid 579 (around 3300mAh). However, the Avid 579's more efficient chipset helps offset this difference. Expect similar all-day battery life with moderate usage on both phones.
Buying Guide
The ZTE Avid 579 is ideal for users who prioritize performance and a slightly more modern experience, even on a tight budget. The ZTE Blade A3 Plus is a good option for those seeking a very basic smartphone for calls, texts, and light usage, and who are extremely price-sensitive.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The ZTE Avid 579 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful chipset. However, neither phone is designed for demanding games.
❓ How much storage do these phones have?
Both phones typically offer limited storage (16GB - 32GB), expandable via microSD card. The Avid 579 might have slightly more RAM (2GB vs 1GB on some Blade A3 Plus variants).
