ZTE A41 Ultra vs. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G: A Head-to-Head Flagship Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G remains the more polished and feature-rich experience, thanks to its superior display and refined software. However, the ZTE A41 Ultra offers nearly identical processing power with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 at a potentially lower price point, making it a strong contender for performance-focused users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE A41 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G (5+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 71, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2022, February 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022 | Available. Released 2022, February 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.9 x 72.9 x 8.5 mm (6.37 x 2.87 x 0.33 in) | 163.3 x 77.9 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 228 g / 229 g (mmWave) (8.04 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Armor aluminum frame with tougher drop and scratch resistance (advertised) Stylus, 2.8ms latency (Bluetooth integration, accelerometer, gyro) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1440 x 3088 pixels, 19.3:9 ratio (~500 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~91.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1750 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) - EuropeOcta-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - ROW |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Exynos 2200 (4 nm) - EuropeQualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) - ROW |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Xclipse 920 - EuropeAdreno 730 - ROW |
| OS | Android 12, MyOS 12 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.33", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 70mm (telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 10 MP, f/4.9, 230mm (periscope telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 10x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, Super Steady video |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 35mm (standard), 1/1.7", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 116˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Video | Yes | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 44 MP, (wide) | 40 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.82", 0.7µm, PDAF |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Samsung DeX, Samsung Wireless DeX (desktop experience support) Bixby natural language commands and dictation Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, PD3.0, QC4 | 45W wired, PD3.0 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Phantom Black, White, Burgundy, Green, Graphite, Red, Sky Blue, Bora Purple |
| Models | - | SM-S908B, SM-S908B/DS, SM-S908U, SM-S908U1, SM-S908W, SM-S908N, SM-S9080, SM-S908E, SM-S908E/DS |
| Price | - | € 397.07 / $ 269.98 / £ 304.99 / ₹ 63,899 |
| SAR | - | 1.18 W/kg (head) 0.98 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 108h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 968359 (v9) GeekBench: 3657 (v5.1) GFXBench: 37fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE A41 Ultra
- Faster 66W wired charging
- Potentially more consistent performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
- Likely more affordable price point
- Less detailed display specifications
- Unknown camera performance
- Potentially less refined software experience
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
- Brighter and more color-accurate display
- Versatile camera system
- Established Samsung ecosystem and software support
- Slower 45W wired charging
- Exynos variant may experience thermal throttling
- Higher price point
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra boasts a significantly brighter display, peaking at 1266 nits, compared to an unstated peak brightness for the ZTE A41 Ultra. While both likely utilize AMOLED technology, Samsung’s display benefits from its contrast ratio of infinite (nominal). This translates to a more visible screen in direct sunlight and a more vibrant viewing experience. The S22 Ultra’s display is also likely to have a more sophisticated LTPO implementation for variable refresh rates, potentially improving battery life during static content viewing. The ZTE A41 Ultra’s display specs are less detailed, making a direct comparison of color accuracy and refresh rate capabilities difficult.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking for the ZTE A41 Ultra. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is known for its versatile camera system, including a high-resolution primary sensor and advanced image processing. Without knowing the sensor sizes, apertures, and OIS implementation of the ZTE A41 Ultra, it’s difficult to assess its camera performance relative to the S22 Ultra. The S22 Ultra’s image processing is geared towards vibrant, shareable photos, while the ZTE A41 Ultra’s approach remains unknown. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on many phones in this class is often a marketing gimmick and unlikely to significantly impact image quality.
Performance
Both devices utilize the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) in certain regions, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also ships with the Exynos 2200 (4nm) in Europe. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in the ZTE A41 Ultra and the ROW version of the S22 Ultra feature an octa-core configuration with 1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510 cores. The Exynos 2200 variant of the S22 Ultra has a slightly lower peak Cortex-X2 clock speed at 2.8 GHz. While the CPU core arrangement is similar, the Exynos 2200 has historically faced criticism regarding thermal throttling under sustained load, potentially impacting long gaming sessions. The ZTE A41 Ultra, with its dedicated Snapdragon variant, may offer more consistent performance. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5 RAM, but the speed and configuration are unspecified.
Battery Life
Both the ZTE A41 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G achieve an endurance rating of 108 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the ZTE A41 Ultra boasts significantly faster 66W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC4 support, compared to the S22 Ultra’s 45W wired charging, 15W wireless (Qi), and 4.5W reverse wireless. This means the ZTE A41 Ultra can likely charge from 0-100% much faster, offering a more convenient charging experience. The S22 Ultra’s wireless and reverse wireless charging capabilities provide added flexibility, but the charging speed is considerably slower.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE A41 Ultra if you prioritize raw processing power and fast 66W charging, and are comfortable with a potentially less refined software experience. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G if you value a brighter, more color-accurate display, a more versatile camera system, and the established ecosystem of Samsung's One UI.