ZTE A41 Ultra vs OnePlus 10 Pro: A Deep Dive into Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus 10 Pro emerges as the slightly better choice. Its 80W charging (internationally) significantly reduces downtime, and the 107-hour endurance rating suggests optimized power management. While the ZTE A41 Ultra is a capable device, the OnePlus 10 Pro’s charging and battery life provide a more seamless daily experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE A41 Ultra | OnePlus 10 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA) Cat18 1200/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2022, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022 | Available. Released 2022, January 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.9 x 72.9 x 8.5 mm (6.37 x 2.87 x 0.33 in) | 163 x 73.9 x 8.6 mm (6.42 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant - T-Mobile only (not for use underwater, liquid damage is not covered under warranty) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~91.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz | LTPO2 Fluid AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, MyOS 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 (International), ColorOS (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 35mm (standard), 1/1.7", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 116˚ (ultrawide) | 48 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 77mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 150˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm |
| Video | Yes | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 44 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, PD3.0, QC4 | 80W wired, PD, 100% in 32 min (International) 65W wired, PD, 58% in 15 min (North America) 50W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Volcanic Black, Emerald Forest, Panda White (Extreme Edition) |
| Models | - | NE2210, NE2211, NE2213, NE2215, NE2217 |
| Price | - | $ 264.39 / C$ 349.99 / £ 360.00 / € 399.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.70 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 107h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 886248 (v9) GeekBench: 3447 (v5.1) GFXBench: 48fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE A41 Ultra
- Potentially lower price point
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 performance
- PD3.0 and QC4 charging compatibility
- Slower charging speed (66W)
- Battery life details unavailable
- Limited camera information
OnePlus 10 Pro
- 80W (International) / 65W (NA) fast charging
- 107-hour endurance rating
- 780 nits peak brightness
- North American charging speed is slower
- Potential for throttling under sustained load
- Price may be higher than ZTE A41 Ultra
Display Comparison
Both devices share a similar core: a high-refresh-rate display driven by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1’s Adreno GPU. However, the OnePlus 10 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 780 nits, suggesting a potentially more visible screen outdoors. While both likely utilize LTPO technology for variable refresh rates (though not explicitly stated for the A41 Ultra), the OnePlus 10 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) hints at superior black levels and overall image quality. The A41 Ultra’s display specs are less detailed, making a direct comparison challenging, but the OnePlus 10 Pro appears to have a slight edge in visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Given OnePlus’s history with Hasselblad partnerships, the 10 Pro likely emphasizes color science and image processing geared towards natural-looking photos. The ZTE A41 Ultra’s camera system remains a mystery without sensor size or aperture information. Without these details, it’s impossible to assess the low-light performance or dynamic range capabilities of either device. We can assume both will offer a range of shooting modes, but the OnePlus 10 Pro’s brand recognition in camera technology gives it a tentative advantage.
Performance
At the heart of both the ZTE A41 Ultra and the OnePlus 10 Pro lies the Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm). Both utilize the same CPU configuration: 1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510 cores. This means raw processing power will be nearly identical. The key differentiator will be thermal management. While neither device’s cooling solution is detailed, the OnePlus 10 Pro’s larger chassis *potentially* allows for a more effective heat dissipation system, mitigating potential throttling during sustained workloads. Both likely employ LPDDR5 RAM, but the speed isn’t specified, further emphasizing thermal management as the critical performance factor.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 10 Pro’s battery life is clearly defined with an endurance rating of 107 hours, indicating excellent power efficiency. The ZTE A41 Ultra’s battery capacity is not specified, making a direct mAh comparison impossible. However, the charging speeds are a significant point of divergence. The OnePlus 10 Pro supports 80W wired charging (international) achieving a full charge in 32 minutes, and 65W in North America (58% in 15 minutes). The ZTE A41 Ultra offers 66W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC4 support. The OnePlus 10 Pro’s faster charging, coupled with its strong endurance rating, provides a more convenient user experience, especially for those who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE A41 Ultra if you prioritize a potentially lower price point and are comfortable with slightly slower charging speeds. It’s a solid performer for users who don’t demand the absolute fastest replenishment. Buy the OnePlus 10 Pro if you value rapid charging – especially the 80W international standard – and long-lasting battery life. It’s ideal for power users and those who frequently find themselves away from a charger.