ZTE A41 Ultra vs Google Pixel 6 Pro: A Head-to-Head Comparison of Flagship Androids
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a smooth, intelligent experience and exceptional camera capabilities, the Google Pixel 6 Pro is the better choice. However, users demanding the fastest possible charging and potentially higher sustained performance in demanding tasks will find the ZTE A41 Ultra more appealing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE A41 Ultra | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GLUOG, G8VOU |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G8VOU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GLUOG | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2021, October 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022 | Available. Released 2021, October 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.9 x 72.9 x 8.5 mm (6.37 x 2.87 x 0.33 in) | 163.9 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~91.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 12, MyOS 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 35mm (standard), 1/1.7", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 116˚ (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 104mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 4x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 44 MP, (wide) | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, PD3.0, QC4 | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5003 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Cloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black |
| Models | - | GLUOG, G8VOU, GF5KQ |
| Price | - | € 199.99 / $ 204.99 / £ 275.00 / ₹ 29,699 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 84h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 585485 (v8), 719815 (v9) GeekBench: 2831 (v5.1) GFXBench: 39 fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE A41 Ultra
- Significantly faster 66W wired charging
- Potentially higher sustained CPU performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
- Likely more aggressive pricing
- Missing display specifications (refresh rate, panel type)
- Potential for thermal throttling under heavy load
- Camera performance is unknown without sensor details
Google Pixel 6 Pro
- Exceptional camera performance and computational photography
- Clean and optimized Android experience with exclusive features
- Bright and vibrant display with LTPO technology
- Slower 23W wired charging
- Google Tensor chip may not match Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in raw CPU power
- Can be more expensive than comparable Snapdragon-powered devices
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 6 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 846 nits, providing excellent visibility outdoors. While the ZTE A41 Ultra’s display specs are not provided, it’s reasonable to expect a comparable brightness level given its flagship positioning. The Pixel 6 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a high-quality OLED panel. The absence of refresh rate information for the A41 Ultra is a key omission; the Pixel 6 Pro’s variable refresh rate (LTPO) contributes to battery efficiency. The Pixel 6 Pro’s larger display size and curved edges also offer a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6 Pro is renowned for its computational photography prowess, driven by the Google Tensor chip. While specific sensor details for the A41 Ultra are missing, the Pixel 6 Pro’s image processing algorithms consistently deliver excellent dynamic range and color accuracy. The Pixel 6 Pro’s focus on software optimization allows it to excel in challenging lighting conditions. The A41 Ultra’s camera system will likely rely more on hardware specifications, but without details, it’s difficult to assess its capabilities against the Pixel 6 Pro’s established reputation. The absence of information regarding OIS and lens apertures on the A41 Ultra hinders a complete comparison.
Performance
The ZTE A41 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) and the Pixel 6 Pro’s Google Tensor (5nm) represent different philosophies. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, with its Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.00 GHz, aims for peak CPU performance. However, the 4nm process, while efficient, can be prone to thermal throttling under sustained load. The Google Tensor, while using a slightly older 5nm process, prioritizes AI and machine learning tasks, enhancing features like voice recognition and image processing. The Pixel 6 Pro’s CPU configuration (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1) focuses on sustained performance, potentially mitigating throttling issues. The A41 Ultra’s LPDDR5 RAM versus the Pixel 6 Pro’s unspecified RAM speed is another factor, with LPDDR5 offering faster data transfer rates.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 84 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite differing battery capacities (which are not specified for the A41 Ultra). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The ZTE A41 Ultra’s 66W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC4, significantly outperforms the Pixel 6 Pro’s 23W wired charging (50% in 30 minutes). The Pixel 6 Pro also offers 23W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, features absent on the A41 Ultra. This makes the A41 Ultra ideal for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly, while the Pixel 6 Pro provides more versatile charging options.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE A41 Ultra if you need blazing-fast 66W charging, prioritize sustained gaming performance due to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1’s thermal headroom, and value a more aggressive price point. Buy the Google Pixel 6 Pro if you prefer Google’s clean Android experience, prioritize computational photography and image processing, and appreciate features like Magic Eraser and Live Translate, even if it means slower charging.