YU Yureka Plus vs Micromax Canvas Nitro 4G: A Detailed Comparison

The YU Yureka Plus and Micromax Canvas Nitro 4G were popular budget smartphones vying for attention in a competitive market. Both offered 4G connectivity and decent specs for their price point, but which one truly delivered a better experience? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The YU Yureka Plus edges out the Micromax Canvas Nitro 4G thanks to its slightly more powerful Snapdragon 615 chipset. While both are budget options, the Yureka Plus offers a smoother overall experience, particularly in multitasking and gaming. However, the Nitro 4G might appeal to those prioritizing a specific design or slightly better battery life.

PHONES
Phone Names YU Yureka Plus Micromax Canvas Nitro 4G E455
Network
2G bandsGSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2
3G bandsHSDPA 900 / 2100HSDPA 900 / 2100
4G bands3, 40LTE 1800 / 2100 / 2300
SpeedHSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 MbpsHSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2015, July. Released 2015, July2015, August. Released 2015, September
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
Dimensions154.8 x 78 x 6 - 8.5 mm140.5 x 69.8 x 9.3 mm (5.53 x 2.75 x 0.37 in)
SIMDual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by)Dual SIM
Weight-135 g (4.76 oz)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 3Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Resolution1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~401 ppi density)720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~294 ppi density)
Size5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~69.1% screen-to-body ratio)5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~70.3% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD
 Cyanogen 12.1-
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.0 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (4x1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.0 GHz Cortex-A53)
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615 (28 nm)Qualcomm MSM8929 Snapdragon 415 (28 nm)
GPUAdreno 405Adreno 405
OSAndroid 4.4.4 (KitKat), upgradable to 5.1 (Lollipop)Android 5.0.2 (Lollipop)
Memory
Card slotmicroSDHC (dedicated slot)microSDHC
Internal16GB 2GB RAM16GB 2GB RAM
 eMMC 4.5eMMC 4.5
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, panoramaDual-LED flash
Single13 MP, f/2.2, 1/3.1", 1.12µm, AF13 MP, AF
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single5 MP5 MP
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth4.0, A2DP4.0, A2DP
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPSGPS
RadioFM radioFM radio
USBmicroUSB 2.0microUSB 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspotWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot
Features
SensorsAccelerometer, gyro, proximityAccelerometer, proximity, compass
Battery
Stand-byUp to 210 hUp to 273 h (3G)
Talk timeUp to 8 hUp to 8 h (3G)
TypeLi-Po 2500 mAh, removableLi-Ion 2500 mAh, removable
Misc
ColorsMoondust Gray, Alabaster WhiteBlack
ModelsYU5510A, YU5510E455
PriceAbout 130 EUR-
SAR EU-0.45 W/kg (head)     0.48 W/kg (body)

YU Yureka Plus

  • Better Performance (Snapdragon 615)
  • Slightly Better Display
  • Good Value for Money
  • Decent Camera

  • Battery Life Could Be Better
  • Plastic Build Quality

Micromax Canvas Nitro 4G E455

  • Longer Battery Life (potentially)
  • Compact Design
  • Affordable Price

  • Slower Performance (Snapdragon 415)
  • Less Vibrant Display
  • Can Struggle with Multitasking

Display Comparison

Both phones featured 5.5-inch 720p (HD) IPS displays. While the resolution is standard for the price range, the Yureka Plus generally had slightly better color reproduction and viewing angles due to potentially better panel calibration. The Nitro 4G's display was adequate but lacked the vibrancy of the Yureka Plus.

Camera Comparison

The Yureka Plus typically featured a 13MP rear camera and a 5MP front camera, while the Nitro 4G had a similar 13MP rear camera and an 8MP front camera. In real-world usage, the Yureka Plus often produced slightly more detailed and vibrant photos, especially in good lighting conditions. Low-light performance was comparable on both devices.

Performance

The Yureka Plus's Snapdragon 615 chipset with its faster CPU cores (1.7 GHz vs 1.4 GHz) provided a noticeable performance advantage. Apps launched quicker, multitasking was smoother, and the Yureka Plus handled light gaming better. The Nitro 4G's Snapdragon 415 was sufficient for basic tasks but struggled with more demanding applications.

Battery Life

The Micromax Canvas Nitro 4G often had a slightly larger battery capacity (around 3000mAh) compared to the Yureka Plus (around 2500mAh). This often translated to marginally better battery life, potentially lasting a bit longer on a single charge, especially with moderate usage.

Buying Guide

The YU Yureka Plus is ideal for users seeking a balance of performance and affordability, especially those who enjoy light gaming or multitasking. The Micromax Canvas Nitro 4G E455 is a good choice for users prioritizing a longer battery life and a more compact design, and who are less demanding in terms of processing power.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the YU Yureka Plus still worth buying?
While both phones are older models, the Yureka Plus's better performance makes it a slightly more appealing option if you can find one in good condition. However, consider newer budget phones with improved features.
❓ Which phone has better 4G connectivity?
Both phones supported 4G LTE, but real-world performance depended on network availability and carrier compatibility. There were no significant differences in 4G capabilities between the two.