The Yezz Max 3 and Nokia 3.1 Plus represent the lower end of the smartphone market, targeting users prioritizing affordability. However, significant differences in their underlying hardware mean one offers a substantially better user experience. This comparison dissects those differences, focusing on performance, battery life, and overall value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Nokia 3.1 Plus is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Helio P22 (or Snapdragon 439 in the US) chipset, built on a more efficient 12nm process, delivers significantly faster performance than the Yezz Max 3’s Unisoc SC9832E. While both phones aim for budget-friendliness, the Nokia provides a smoother, more responsive experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 3, 4, 7, 12, 17, 28 | 2, 4, 5, 12, 14, 29, 30 - USA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, September | 2018, October. Released 2018, October |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 149.3 x 77.2 x 9.7 mm (5.88 x 3.04 x 0.38 in) | 156.9 x 76.4 x 8.2 mm (6.18 x 3.01 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~268 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.45 inches, 76.7 cm2 (~66.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.0 inches, 92.9 cm2 (~77.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 - GlobalOcta-core (4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.45 GHz Cortex A53) - USA |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9832E (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) - GlobalQualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 (12 nm) - USA |
| GPU | Mali-T820 MP1 | PowerVR GE8320 - GlobalAdreno 505 - USA |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 8.1 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10, Android One |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 13 MP, AF
0.3 MP
0.3 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | Yes | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (USA, APAC & EMEA) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, recording | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted) | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 2600 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 3500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Denim Blue, Aurora Green, Glacier Blue, Space Gray, Coral Red | Blue, White, Gray |
| Models | - | TA-1118, TA-1125, TA-1113, TA-1117, TA-1124, TA-1125 |
| Price | About 70 EUR | About 120 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.41 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
Yezz Max 3
- Potentially lower price point
- Basic smartphone functionality
- May suit users with extremely limited needs
- Significantly slower processor
- Less efficient chipset (28nm)
- Likely limited multitasking capabilities
Nokia 3.1 Plus
- Faster and more efficient processor (Helio P22/Snapdragon 439)
- Octa-core CPU for smoother multitasking
- 12nm process for better battery life
- May be slightly more expensive
- 10W charging is relatively slow
- Basic camera system
Display Comparison
Neither device is expected to boast a high-end display. Specifics regarding panel type, resolution, and brightness are unavailable for the Yezz Max 3, suggesting a basic LCD. The Nokia 3.1 Plus also utilizes an LCD, but its focus is on efficiency rather than visual fidelity. The lack of detailed display specs suggests both prioritize cost savings over screen quality, making them suitable for casual use but not ideal for media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar on both devices, leaning towards basic functionality. Without detailed sensor information, it’s safe to assume both feature modest sensors. The Nokia 3.1 Plus may benefit from slightly better image processing capabilities due to its more powerful chipset, but neither phone is expected to excel in low-light conditions or offer advanced photographic features. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering minimal practical benefit.
Performance
The Nokia 3.1 Plus holds a substantial advantage in performance. Its Mediatek Helio P22 (global) or Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (US) is an octa-core processor built on a 12nm process, offering a 2.0 GHz clock speed. This contrasts sharply with the Yezz Max 3’s Unisoc SC9832E, a quad-core 1.3 GHz chip fabricated on a larger 28nm node. The 12nm process of the Nokia’s chipset translates to better power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling, allowing for sustained performance during more demanding tasks. The octa-core configuration further enhances multitasking capabilities compared to the Yezz Max 3’s quad-core design.
Battery Life
Battery capacity details are missing for the Yezz Max 3. The Nokia 3.1 Plus supports 10W wired charging. While neither phone offers fast charging, the Nokia’s more efficient chipset (Helio P22/Snapdragon 439) will likely result in better real-world battery life, even with a similar capacity battery. The 12nm process reduces power consumption, extending usage time between charges.
Buying Guide
Buy the Yezz Max 3 if your primary need is a very basic smartphone for essential tasks like calls and light messaging, and you are operating under a very strict budget. Buy the Nokia 3.1 Plus if you value a more responsive user interface, smoother multitasking, and a generally more capable smartphone experience, even if it means spending a little more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Unisoc SC9832E chipset in the Yezz Max 3 sufficient for running popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook?
While the Unisoc SC9832E can handle basic apps like WhatsApp and Facebook, performance will be noticeably slower and less responsive compared to the Nokia 3.1 Plus. Expect longer loading times and potential lag when switching between apps.
❓ Does the Nokia 3.1 Plus overheat during prolonged use, such as video playback or gaming?
The Mediatek Helio P22/Snapdragon 439 chipset in the Nokia 3.1 Plus is built on a 12nm process, which offers better thermal efficiency than the Yezz Max 3’s 28nm chip. This means the Nokia 3.1 Plus is less likely to overheat during extended use, although it’s not designed for demanding gaming.
❓ What type of charging port does each phone use?
Both the Yezz Max 3 and Nokia 3.1 Plus utilize a micro-USB port for charging and data transfer. Neither supports the newer USB-C standard.
❓ Will the Nokia 3.1 Plus receive software updates?
The Nokia 3.1 Plus was part of the Android One program, meaning it was guaranteed to receive at least two years of Android version updates and three years of security patches. However, support may have ended depending on the purchase date.
