The Yezz Max 3 Plus and Samsung Galaxy A10e represent distinct approaches to the ultra-budget smartphone market. The Yezz aims for a larger screen presence, while the Samsung leverages brand recognition and a more refined, if still basic, user experience. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which device delivers the best value for users prioritizing affordability.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Samsung Galaxy A10e emerges as the better choice. Its Exynos 7884 chipset, fabricated on a 14nm process, provides significantly improved performance and efficiency compared to the Yezz Max 3 Plus’s 28nm Unisoc SC9832E, translating to a smoother overall experience and better multitasking capabilities.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - AT&T |
| 4G bands | 2, 3, 4, 7, 12, 17, 28 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 29, 30, 66 - AT&T |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 - Metro PCS, T-Mobile |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, October | 2019, July. Released 2019, August |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.8 x 77.2 x 9.5 mm (6.29 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) | 147.3 x 69.6 x 8.4 mm (5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 141 g (4.97 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | INX Glass | - |
| Resolution | 480 x 1010 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~183 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.1 inches, 93.1 cm2 (~75.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.83 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.4 GHz | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A73 & 6x1.35 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9832E (28 nm) | Exynos 7884 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-T820 MP1 | Mali-G71 MP2 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, One UI 3.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/1.9, AF
or
5 MP, AF |
| Triple | 13 MP, AF
0.3 MP
0.3 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP, f/2.0
or
2 MP |
| Video | Yes | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted) | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 3700 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Glacier Blue, Cosmic Blue, Carbon Grey | Black |
| Models | - | SM-A102U, SM-S102DL, SM-A102U1, SM-A102W, SM-A102N |
| Price | About 90 EUR | About 80 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.47 W/kg (head) 0.54 W/kg (body) |
Yezz Max 3 Plus
- Potentially larger screen size (unconfirmed)
- May offer slightly longer battery life in standby due to larger capacity (if applicable)
- Lower price point (potentially)
- Significantly weaker processor performance
- Less efficient chipset (28nm)
- Limited software support and updates
- Potentially lower camera quality
Samsung Galaxy A10e
- More powerful and efficient Exynos 7884 processor
- Better multitasking and app performance
- Brand recognition and software support from Samsung
- More refined user experience
- Smaller screen size compared to the Yezz Max 3 Plus (potentially)
- May have slightly shorter battery life under heavy load
- Higher price point (potentially)
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Specifics like brightness nits and color accuracy are unavailable for the Yezz Max 3 Plus, but given its market segment, expectations should be tempered. The Galaxy A10e features a 6.3-inch HD+ TFT LCD. The larger process node of the Unisoc chip in the Yezz Max 3 Plus likely contributes to lower power efficiency, potentially impacting display brightness and longevity. Both displays are likely to suffer in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance on both devices is expected to be basic. Details regarding sensor sizes and apertures are limited for the Yezz Max 3 Plus. The Galaxy A10e features a 12MP main camera. While the A10e’s camera isn’t exceptional, its image processing algorithms and sensor quality are likely superior to the Yezz Max 3 Plus, resulting in more detailed and accurate photos, especially in good lighting conditions. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on the A10e is largely a marketing gimmick, offering minimal practical benefit.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Samsung Galaxy A10e’s Exynos 7884, an octa-core processor built on a 14nm FinFET process, offers a substantial advantage over the Yezz Max 3 Plus’s Unisoc SC9832E quad-core chip fabricated on a less efficient 28nm node. The A10e’s CPU configuration – 2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A73 & 6x1.35 GHz Cortex-A53 – provides a blend of performance and efficiency, enabling smoother multitasking and app loading. The Yezz Max 3 Plus will struggle with demanding applications and may exhibit noticeable lag. The A10e’s architecture is also more modern, offering better support for current Android features.
Battery Life
Battery life is a complex equation. While the Yezz Max 3 Plus may have a larger battery capacity (specifics unavailable), the inefficient Unisoc SC9832E processor will consume more power. The Samsung Galaxy A10e, with its 14nm Exynos 7884, offers better power efficiency, potentially resulting in comparable or even longer battery life despite a potentially smaller battery capacity. Charging speeds are also likely to be slower on the Yezz Max 3 Plus due to its less sophisticated power management circuitry.
Buying Guide
Buy the Yezz Max 3 Plus if you absolutely prioritize screen size and are willing to accept compromises in performance and software support. It's a viable option for extremely basic usage like calls and light messaging. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A10e if you value a more responsive user experience, better app compatibility, and the backing of a major manufacturer, even if it means a slightly smaller display. The A10e is the better all-rounder for most users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 7884 in the Galaxy A10e tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 7884 is a relatively efficient chip. While it will get warm during extended gaming, it's unlikely to experience significant thermal throttling due to its 14nm fabrication process and the A10e's basic thermal design. Expect moderate performance dips after prolonged use, but not a complete shutdown.
❓ Is the Unisoc SC9832E in the Yezz Max 3 Plus capable of running popular games like PUBG Mobile?
The Unisoc SC9832E will struggle with PUBG Mobile. While it might be possible to run the game at the lowest settings, expect significant lag, frame drops, and an overall poor gaming experience. The processor's limited processing power and the older 28nm process are major bottlenecks.
❓ How does the software update situation differ between the Yezz Max 3 Plus and the Samsung Galaxy A10e?
Samsung provides more consistent and longer-term software support than Yezz. The Galaxy A10e has already received several Android updates and security patches, while the Yezz Max 3 Plus is likely to receive limited or no updates, leaving it vulnerable to security risks and lacking new features.
