The Yezz Max 3 Plus and BLU Vivo XL2 represent the ultra-budget end of the Android spectrum. Both aim to deliver smartphone functionality at the lowest possible price point, but they achieve this with different chipsets. This comparison dissects the key differences between the Unisoc SC9832E-powered Yezz and the Mediatek MT6737T-equipped BLU to determine which offers the better experience for the price-conscious consumer.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing basic functionality and potentially slightly smoother multitasking, the BLU Vivo XL2 edges out the Yezz Max 3 Plus. While both utilize a 28nm process, the Cortex-A53 architecture in the Mediatek chip provides a modest performance advantage over the Unisoc's core design, making it better suited for everyday tasks.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 3, 4, 7, 12, 17, 28 | 2, 4, 7, 12, 17 - V0070UU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 38, 39, 40, 41 - V0070EE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, October | 2017, January. Released 2017, January |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 159.8 x 77.2 x 9.5 mm (6.29 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) | 154 x 76.6 x 9.2 mm (6.06 x 3.02 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Micro-SIM) |
| Weight | - | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | INX Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 480 x 1010 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~183 ppi density) | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.1 inches, 93.1 cm2 (~75.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~70.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.4 GHz | Quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9832E (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6737T (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-T820 MP1 | Mali-T720 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.0 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 13 MP, PDAF |
| Triple | 13 MP, AF
0.3 MP
0.3 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Video | Yes | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.0, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, recording | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted) | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | - | Up to 750 h (2G) / Up to 650 h (3G) |
| Talk time | - | Up to 29 h (2G) / Up to 19 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Ion 3700 mAh, removable | Li-Po 3150 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Glacier Blue, Cosmic Blue, Carbon Grey | Gold, Blue |
| Price | About 90 EUR | - |
Yezz Max 3 Plus
- Potentially lower price point (depending on retailer)
- May offer slightly longer software support (brand dependent)
- Basic smartphone functionality
- Unisoc SC9832E chipset offers lower performance than Mediatek
- Likely inferior GPU performance
- Limited camera capabilities
BLU Vivo XL2
- Mediatek MT6737T chipset provides a performance advantage
- Cortex-A53 architecture offers better efficiency
- Slightly smoother multitasking experience
- May be slightly more expensive than the Yezz Max 3 Plus
- Limited camera capabilities
- Potential for software bloatware
Display Comparison
Neither Yezz nor BLU provide detailed display specifications in the provided data. Given their price point, it's safe to assume both utilize LCD panels with 720p resolutions. The absence of information regarding peak brightness, color gamut coverage, or PWM dimming rates suggests neither phone will excel in display quality. Users prioritizing outdoor visibility or color accuracy should consider alternatives.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a meaningful comparison is difficult. Both phones likely feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. The absence of information regarding sensor size, aperture, or image stabilization suggests image quality will be limited, particularly in low-light conditions. Any 2MP macro or depth sensors included on either device are unlikely to provide significant value, serving primarily as marketing features.
Performance
Both the Yezz Max 3 Plus and BLU Vivo XL2 are equipped with quad-core 1.4 GHz processors fabricated on a 28nm process. However, the core architecture differs significantly. The BLU utilizes the Mediatek MT6737T with Cortex-A53 cores, a well-established and relatively efficient design. The Yezz employs the Unisoc SC9832E, which, while also quad-core, lacks the architectural refinement of the Cortex-A53. This translates to a likely performance advantage for the BLU in CPU-bound tasks, offering a smoother experience when switching between apps or loading web pages. The GPU performance will also likely favor the BLU, though neither phone is suitable for demanding games.
Battery Life
Battery capacity and charging wattage are not specified. Given the low-power chipsets, both phones should offer all-day battery life with moderate usage. However, the efficiency of the Mediatek MT6737T might provide a slight edge to the BLU Vivo XL2, potentially extending usage time by a small margin. Without fast charging support, expect 0-100% charge times to be several hours.
Buying Guide
Buy the Yezz Max 3 Plus if you need a phone primarily for calls, texts, and very light app usage, and are willing to accept potentially slower performance. Buy the BLU Vivo XL2 if you prefer a device capable of handling slightly more demanding tasks like social media browsing and basic gaming, and value a marginally more responsive user experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the BLU Vivo XL2 be able to run popular social media apps like Facebook and Instagram smoothly?
Yes, the Mediatek MT6737T chipset with its Cortex-A53 cores should handle Facebook, Instagram, and similar social media apps without significant lag. However, expect longer loading times compared to phones with more powerful processors.
❓ Is the Unisoc SC9832E in the Yezz Max 3 Plus suitable for playing mobile games?
The Unisoc SC9832E is not ideal for gaming. While it can run very basic games, expect low frame rates and significant lag in more demanding titles. The BLU Vivo XL2 offers a slightly better gaming experience, but neither phone is a gaming device.
❓ How much storage space do these phones typically offer, and can it be expanded?
While not specified, these phones typically come with 16GB or 32GB of internal storage. Both devices likely support microSD card expansion, allowing you to add more storage for photos, videos, and apps. Check the specific model's specifications before purchasing.
❓ What version of Android do these phones run, and will they receive software updates?
Both phones likely ship with Android 8 or 9 (Go Edition) due to their limited hardware. Software update support is often limited on ultra-budget devices. Don't expect major Android version upgrades, but security patches may be released periodically.
