The Yezz LIV1 and Andy 3.5EI2 represent the ultra-budget end of the smartphone spectrum. Both devices aim to provide basic smartphone functionality at the lowest possible price point, but they differ significantly in their core processing power. This comparison dissects those differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness in basic tasks like calling, texting, and light web browsing, the Yezz LIV1 is the better choice. Its quad-core Unisoc SC7731E chipset offers a noticeable performance advantage over the dual-core Mediatek MT6572M in the Andy 3.5EI2, despite both being built on the same 28nm process.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 - AM35E2I047 |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA |
| | - | HSDPA 850 / 1900 - AM35E2I043 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, August. Released 2019, September | 2015, October. Released 2015, November |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 138.5 x 65.8 x 9.5 mm (5.45 x 2.59 x 0.37 in) | 111.5 x 62.8 x 10.7 mm (4.39 x 2.47 x 0.42 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM |
| Weight | 133.3 g (4.69 oz) | 74 g (2.61 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | AGC glass | - |
| Resolution | 480 x 960 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~215 ppi density) | 320 x 480 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~165 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.0 inches, 64.5 cm2 (~70.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 3.5 inches, 36.5 cm2 (~52.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD | TFT, 256K colors |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 | Dual-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7 |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC7731E (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6572M (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-T820 MP1 | Mali-400 |
| OS | Android 9.1 Pie (Go edition) | Android 4.4 (KitKat) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 1GB RAM | 4GB 512MB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 5 MP | 2 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 2 MP | 1.3 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP, LE | 4.0, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | Up to 220 h | Up to 217 h (3G) |
| Talk time | Up to 7 h 30 min | Up to 8 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Ion 2000 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 1300 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gun Metal, Blue, Red | Black, Red, Silver, White, Blue, Gold |
| Price | About 50 EUR | - |
Yezz LIV1
- Faster quad-core processor for better multitasking.
- More responsive user experience with Android Go.
- Potentially better app compatibility due to increased processing power.
- May be slightly more expensive than the Andy 3.5EI2.
- Likely similar camera performance to the Andy 3.5EI2.
Yezz Andy 3.5EI2
- Lowest possible price point for basic smartphone functionality.
- Simple and easy to use for first-time smartphone owners.
- Good battery life due to low-power chipset.
- Slow performance with even moderate multitasking.
- Limited app compatibility and potential lag.
- Less responsive user experience.
Display Comparison
Given the target market, detailed display specifications are unavailable. However, both devices likely utilize similar low-cost LCD panels. The focus here is on processing power, as the display's impact on the user experience will be minimal on both phones. Expect similar color accuracy and viewing angles, limited by the budget nature of the devices.
Camera Comparison
Both devices likely feature basic camera setups geared towards casual snapshots. Without specific sensor details, it’s safe to assume image quality will be similar, limited by the low-end components. Any megapixel differences will be largely irrelevant given the processing power available. Expect adequate performance in well-lit conditions, but poor low-light performance on both.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Yezz LIV1’s Unisoc SC7731E, with its quad-core Cortex-A7 configuration at 1.3 GHz, provides a significant advantage over the Yezz Andy 3.5EI2’s dual-core Mediatek MT6572M running at 1.0 GHz. While both CPUs are based on the Cortex-A7 architecture, the additional cores in the LIV1 allow for better multitasking and smoother operation, even with Android Go. The 28nm fabrication process is identical, meaning power efficiency differences will be minimal, but the LIV1 will likely handle more demanding tasks without significant slowdowns.
Battery Life
Battery capacity details are unavailable for either device. However, given the low-power chipsets and likely small displays, both phones should offer at least a full day of standby time and moderate usage. Charging speeds are also unknown, but likely slow due to the use of standard micro-USB charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Yezz LIV1 if you need a smartphone capable of handling more than just the most basic functions, such as running a few lightweight apps or managing a slightly busier social media feed. Buy the Yezz Andy 3.5EI2 if your primary use case is strictly voice calls, SMS messaging, and occasional contact management, and you prioritize absolute minimal cost.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Yezz LIV1 handle WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger smoothly?
The Yezz LIV1, with its quad-core processor, is more likely to handle WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger without significant lag compared to the dual-core Andy 3.5EI2. However, don't expect a flawless experience; these apps can still be resource-intensive on such low-end hardware.
❓ Is the Mediatek MT6572M in the Andy 3.5EI2 sufficient for making calls and sending texts?
Yes, the Mediatek MT6572M is perfectly adequate for basic voice calls and SMS messaging. These tasks require minimal processing power, and the Andy 3.5EI2 is designed primarily for these functions. However, attempting anything beyond these basic tasks will likely result in a sluggish experience.
❓ Can I play games on either of these phones?
While technically possible, gaming on either the LIV1 or the Andy 3.5EI2 will be a limited experience. Simple, older games might be playable at low settings, but demanding titles will likely be unplayable due to the limited processing power and graphics capabilities.
