Looking for an affordable smartphone? Yezz offers a couple of options, the GO 3 and the Art 2 Pro. Both aim to deliver value, but significant differences exist under the hood. This comparison will help you decide which Yezz phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Yezz Art 2 Pro is the clear winner. Its octa-core processor, faster clock speeds, and Power Delivery charging offer a noticeable performance and charging advantage over the GO 3's quad-core chipset. While both are budget phones, the Art 2 Pro provides a better overall experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 1900 / 850 |
| 4G bands | - | 2, 3, 4, 7, 12, 17, 28 |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April. Released 2021, August | 2021, April. Released 2021, July |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 125.7 x 63.5 x 9 mm (4.95 x 2.5 x 0.35 in) | 164.2 x 76.3 x 8.8 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 84.5 g (3.00 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | AGC glass | Asahi Glass |
| Resolution | 360 x 640 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~184 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 4.0 inches, 44.1 cm2 (~55.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~82.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC7731e | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-400 MP2 | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 8GB 1GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, Panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP | - |
| Triple | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, 1/2.8", AF
2 MP
2 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 2 MP | 13 MP, f/2.0 |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | Stereo FM radio, recording |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | N/A | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired, PD |
| Type | Li-Ion 1350 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green | Graphite Black, Arctic Blue |
| Price | About 50 EUR | About 120 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.40 W/kg (head) 0.74 W/kg (body) |
Yezz GO 3
- Extremely affordable
- Compact size
- Basic functionality
- Slow performance
- Outdated chipset
- Limited features
- Slow charging
Yezz Art 2 Pro
- Better performance (octa-core)
- Faster charging (PD)
- More responsive UI
- Likely slightly better camera
- Still a budget phone (compromises exist)
- Limited camera capabilities
- Display details are unclear
Display Comparison
While specific display details are scarce for both models, it's likely the Art 2 Pro has a slightly better panel due to its generally higher-tier components. Expect similar resolutions (likely HD+), but the Art 2 Pro *might* offer improved color accuracy and brightness. Both will likely feature IPS LCD panels.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are limited, but the Art 2 Pro *likely* has a slightly better camera setup due to its more powerful chipset. Both phones will probably feature basic camera configurations (likely a single rear camera). Image quality will be adequate for casual snapshots in good lighting conditions, but don't expect exceptional results.
Performance
The Art 2 Pro's Unisoc SC9863A octa-core processor is a significant upgrade. The Cortex-A55 cores offer better efficiency and performance compared to the GO 3's Cortex-A7 cores. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive user interface on the Art 2 Pro. The GO 3 will feel noticeably slower, especially with demanding apps.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is likely similar (around 3000-4000mAh for both). However, the Art 2 Pro's 10W PD charging offers a considerable advantage, allowing for faster charging times compared to the GO 3's standard 10W wired charging.
Buying Guide
The Yezz GO 3 is best for users on the absolute tightest budget who primarily need a basic phone for calls, texts, and light app usage. The Yezz Art 2 Pro is ideal for those who want a smoother experience, better performance for multitasking, and faster charging, even within a budget-friendly price range.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ What is the difference between the Unisoc SC7731e and SC9863A chipsets?
The SC9863A is a significantly more powerful chipset with an octa-core design and newer Cortex-A55 cores, offering better performance and efficiency compared to the SC7731e's quad-core Cortex-A7 design.
❓ Is the Yezz Art 2 Pro worth the extra cost over the Yezz GO 3?
Yes, the Art 2 Pro is generally worth the extra cost. The performance improvements and faster charging make it a much more enjoyable and practical device for everyday use.
