In a market saturated with smartphones, the feature phone persists, offering essential connectivity at an incredibly low price. We pit the Yezz GO 3, powered by a Unisoc chipset, against the Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition, a stalwart of the basic mobile world, to determine which provides the best value for users prioritizing calls, texts, and long battery life.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the user needing a slight step up in functionality beyond basic calling and texting, the Yezz GO 3 emerges as the better choice. Its Unisoc SC7731e chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage, enabling smoother operation of apps and potentially supporting more features than the Nokia 105 4G.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April. Released 2021, August | 2024, December |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2024, December |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 125.7 x 63.5 x 9 mm (4.95 x 2.5 x 0.35 in) | 121.5 x 50 x 14.4 mm (4.78 x 1.97 x 0.57 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 84.5 g (3.00 oz) | 93 g (3.28 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | AGC glass | - |
| Resolution | 360 x 640 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~184 ppi density) | 120 x 160 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~111 ppi density) |
| Size | 4.0 inches, 44.1 cm2 (~55.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 1.8 inches, 10.0 cm2 (~16.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 | - |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC7731e | - |
| GPU | Mali-400 MP2 | - |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | - |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | - | Yes |
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDHC |
| Internal | 8GB 1GB RAM | 48MB 128MB RAM |
| Phonebook | - | Yes |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, Panorama, HDR | - |
| Single | 5 MP | - |
| Video | 720p@30fps | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | No |
| Radio | FM radio | Wireless FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | No |
| Features |
|---|
| Games | - | Yes |
| Java | - | No |
| Messaging | - | SMS |
| Sensors | N/A | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 1350 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 1450 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green | Charcoal |
| Price | About 50 EUR | About 50 EUR |
Yezz GO 3
- More powerful Unisoc SC7731e chipset
- Potential for app support beyond basic functions
- Likely smoother user interface
- Potentially shorter battery life than Nokia 105 4G
- May be slightly more expensive
Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition
- Exceptional battery life
- Proven reliability and durability
- Extremely affordable
- Limited functionality and app support
- Less responsive user experience
Display Comparison
Detailed display specifications are unavailable for the Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition, but it’s safe to assume a basic color LCD panel typical of feature phones. The Yezz GO 3, while also likely utilizing a similar LCD technology, benefits from the processing power of its Unisoc chipset to potentially offer a slightly more vibrant and responsive display experience. The Nokia 105 4G’s strength lies in its likely optimized power consumption for its display, contributing to its long battery life.
Camera Comparison
Neither device is positioned as a photography powerhouse. The Yezz GO 3 likely includes a basic camera sensor, but its quality will be limited by the chipset’s image signal processor (ISP). The Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition may or may not include a camera; if present, it will be similarly basic. For users prioritizing image capture, both phones are inadequate, and a smartphone is a far better choice. The focus here is on connectivity, not photography.
Performance
The Yezz GO 3’s Unisoc SC7731e chipset, featuring a quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 CPU, represents a significant leap in processing power compared to the Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition. While the Nokia 105 4G’s chipset details are absent, Nokia traditionally focuses on efficiency over raw performance in this segment. The Yezz GO 3’s architecture allows for smoother multitasking and the potential to run more complex applications, making it suitable for users who want to access basic social media or web browsing. The Cortex-A7 cores, while older, are still capable of handling basic tasks efficiently.
Battery Life
The Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition is renowned for its exceptional battery life, a hallmark of Nokia feature phones. While the Yezz GO 3’s battery capacity is unknown, the more powerful Unisoc SC7731e chipset will inevitably consume more power. However, the Yezz GO 3’s ability to handle more efficient data connections (4G) could offset some of this power drain. The Nokia 105 4G likely excels in standby time, while the Yezz GO 3 may offer more usable time with moderate app usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Yezz GO 3 if you need a feature phone capable of running basic apps like WhatsApp or a simple web browser, and appreciate a slightly more responsive user experience. Buy the Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition if you prioritize extreme simplicity, maximum battery life, and a proven track record of reliability, and have no need for app functionality beyond the pre-installed options.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Can the Yezz GO 3 run WhatsApp, and will it be a smooth experience?
Yes, the Yezz GO 3, with its Unisoc SC7731e chipset, should be capable of running WhatsApp. However, expect a basic experience. Image and video loading will be slower than on a smartphone, and multitasking with WhatsApp open alongside other apps may be limited. It's functional, but not optimized.
❓ How much longer will the Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition likely last on a single charge compared to the Yezz GO 3?
The Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition is expected to last significantly longer on a single charge. Nokia feature phones are renowned for their power efficiency. While the Yezz GO 3’s 4G connectivity might offer more efficient data usage, the more powerful processor will consume more power overall, resulting in a shorter battery life.
❓ Is the Yezz GO 3 a good option for someone who rarely uses apps and primarily needs a phone for calls and texts?
While the Yezz GO 3 *can* handle calls and texts, it's arguably overkill for someone with minimal needs. The Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition is a more focused and efficient device for that specific use case, offering longer battery life and a simpler experience.
