The Yezz GO 1 and Wiko Y62 Plus represent the extreme end of the smartphone price spectrum. Both aim to deliver basic smartphone functionality at an incredibly low cost, but they take different approaches to achieving this. The Yezz GO 1 relies on an older, more power-efficient chipset, while the Wiko Y62 Plus opts for a newer, faster processor. This comparison will dissect the trade-offs between these two devices to help you determine which best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and a smoother experience, the Wiko Y62 Plus is the clear winner. Its Helio A20 chipset, built on a 12nm process, provides a significant performance boost over the Yezz GO 1’s MT6580. However, the Yezz GO 1 may appeal to those seeking maximum battery life and minimal cost.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 20 |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, February. Released 2020, July 28 | 2021, Q3 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, Q3 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 128.5 x 65.2 x 11 mm (5.06 x 2.57 x 0.43 in) | 157 x 75.8 x 9.1 mm (6.18 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 123 g (4.34 oz) | 172 g (6.07 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~233 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) |
| Size | 4.0 inches, 45.5 cm2 (~54.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 91.3 cm2 (~76.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz | Quad-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6580 (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6761D Helio A20 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-400 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 10 (Go edition) | Android 11 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 8GB 1GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, Panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP, AF |
| Video | 720p | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Single | 2 MP | 5 MP |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 1400 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 3000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Dark Blue, Light Blue, Mint |
| Models | - | W-K610-FRA |
| Price | - | About 70 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.42 W/kg (head) 1.61 W/kg (body) |
Yezz GO 1
- Potentially longer battery life due to the efficient MT6580 chipset.
- Lower price point is likely.
- Simpler software experience may appeal to some users.
- Significantly slower performance compared to the Wiko Y62 Plus.
- Struggles with multitasking and demanding apps.
- Likely limited software updates.
Wiko Y62 Plus
- Faster processor (Helio A20) for a smoother user experience.
- More responsive app loading and multitasking.
- Built on a more modern 12nm process.
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to the Yezz GO 1.
- May be slightly more expensive.
- Camera performance is still limited by sensor quality.
Display Comparison
Neither device is expected to boast a high-end display. Given the price point, both likely utilize LCD panels with modest resolutions. The lack of detailed display specifications necessitates focusing on the chipset's impact on UI smoothness. The Wiko Y62 Plus’s faster processor will contribute to smoother scrolling and animations, even if the panel itself is basic. Bezels are likely substantial on both devices, reflecting their budget nature.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, it’s safe to assume both devices feature basic camera setups. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely marketing fluff; image quality will be limited. The primary sensor’s size and aperture are the key determinants of image quality, but this information is unavailable. The Wiko Y62 Plus’s more powerful processor *may* allow for slightly better image processing, but the fundamental limitations of the sensors will be the bottleneck. Expect acceptable results in good lighting conditions, but poor performance in low light.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Wiko Y62 Plus’s Mediatek MT6761D Helio A20 (12nm) is a significant upgrade over the Yezz GO 1’s Mediatek MT6580 (28nm). The 12nm fabrication process is more efficient, and the Helio A20’s Cortex-A53 cores, clocked at 1.8 GHz, offer a substantial performance advantage over the MT6580’s 1.3 GHz cores. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive overall experience. While both are quad-core, the architectural improvements and higher clock speed of the Helio A20 are crucial. The Yezz GO 1 will struggle with even moderately demanding apps.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Yezz GO 1’s more power-efficient MT6580 chipset, built on a 28nm process, will likely result in longer battery life. The Wiko Y62 Plus’s Helio A20, while more efficient than older chips, consumes more power due to its higher performance. Charging wattage is also unknown, but given the budget nature of these phones, expect relatively slow charging speeds. The Yezz GO 1 prioritizes longevity, while the Wiko Y62 Plus trades some battery life for performance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Yezz GO 1 if you need a phone primarily for basic communication – calls, texts, and light app usage – and battery life is paramount. You're willing to accept slower performance for extended uptime. Buy the Wiko Y62 Plus if you prefer a more responsive user experience, even for simple tasks, and are willing to potentially sacrifice some battery life for the added processing power. This is the better choice for occasional social media browsing or light gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Wiko Y62 Plus be able to run popular social media apps like Facebook and Instagram smoothly?
Yes, the Wiko Y62 Plus’s Helio A20 chipset should handle Facebook and Instagram without significant lag. While not a high-end experience, it will be noticeably smoother than the Yezz GO 1, especially when scrolling through feeds or loading images.
❓ Is the Yezz GO 1 suitable for someone who primarily uses their phone for calls and texts?
Absolutely. The Yezz GO 1 is perfectly adequate for basic communication. Its power-efficient chipset will provide excellent battery life for calls and texts, making it a good choice for users with minimal smartphone needs.
❓ Can I expect to play games on the Wiko Y62 Plus?
Simple, less demanding games will be playable on the Wiko Y62 Plus, but don't expect a high-performance gaming experience. The Helio A20 is not a gaming-focused chipset, and you'll likely need to lower graphics settings for smoother gameplay.
