The ultra-budget smartphone segment is fiercely competitive. Both the Yezz GO 1 and Samsung Galaxy A02 aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at the lowest possible price. However, despite similar price points, key differences in chipset architecture and RAM configurations create distinct user experiences. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A02 is the better choice. While both phones utilize Mediatek chipsets fabricated on a 28nm process, the A02’s MT6739W, coupled with its Cortex-A53 cores and available RAM options, provides a noticeably smoother and more responsive experience than the Yezz GO 1’s older MT6580.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, February. Released 2020, July 28 | 2021, January 27 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, January 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 128.5 x 65.2 x 11 mm (5.06 x 2.57 x 0.43 in) | 164 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 123 g (4.34 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~233 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 4.0 inches, 45.5 cm2 (~54.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz | Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6580 (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6739W (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-400 | PowerVR GE8100 |
| OS | Android 10 (Go edition) | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, One UI Core 3.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 8GB 1GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/1.9, (wide), AF
2 MP (macro) |
| Features | LED flash, Panorama, HDR | LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP | - |
| Video | 720p | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 2 MP | 5 MP, f/2.0 |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 1400 mAh, removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Blue |
| Models | - | SM-A022F, SM-A022F/DS, SM-A022M, SM-A022M/DS, SM-A022G, SM-A022G/DS |
| Price | - | € 97.46 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.65 W/kg (head) 1.71 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 32GB 2GB RAM | - | $ 149.99 |
| 32GB 3GB RAM | - | $ 129.99 |
| 64GB 3GB RAM | - | $ 199.99 |
| RENEWED | - | £ 113.00 |
Yezz GO 1
- Potentially lower price point
- Functional for basic tasks
- Compact form factor
- Outdated chipset (MT6580)
- Likely limited RAM
- Poor multitasking performance
Samsung Galaxy A02
- More modern chipset (MT6739W)
- Available RAM options (2GB/3GB)
- Better overall performance
- Wider brand recognition
- Slightly higher price
- Still limited camera capabilities
- Basic display quality
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both are likely to feature LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. Specifics like resolution and brightness are not provided, but we can assume they are similar – likely 720p+ and adequate for indoor use. The lack of information prevents a detailed comparison of color accuracy or viewing angles. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices, maximizing screen real estate within a compact form factor.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance will be basic on both phones. Details are scarce, but both likely feature a primary camera and potentially a secondary depth sensor. The Yezz GO 1’s camera specs are unknown, while the A02 often includes a 13MP main sensor. Image processing will be minimal on both, resulting in photos that are acceptable in good lighting but struggle in low-light conditions. Any 2MP macro or depth sensors included should be considered marketing features rather than significant photographic tools.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A02’s Mediatek MT6739W, with its quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 CPUs, represents a generational improvement over the Yezz GO 1’s MT6580 (1.3 GHz). Cortex-A53 cores are more efficient and offer better single-core performance than the cores found in the MT6580. The A02’s availability in 2GB or 3GB RAM configurations is critical; 2GB is barely sufficient for modern Android, while 3GB significantly improves multitasking. The Yezz GO 1’s RAM is unspecified, but likely 1GB or 2GB, severely limiting its ability to handle multiple apps. Thermal management is unlikely to be a concern on either device given the low-power chipsets.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, given the low-power chipsets and likely smaller screen sizes, both should provide all-day battery life with moderate usage. Charging wattage is also unknown, but likely limited to 5W or 10W, resulting in relatively slow charging times. The A02’s slightly more efficient chipset may translate to marginally longer battery life, but the difference will likely be minimal.
Buying Guide
Buy the Yezz GO 1 if your primary need is a functional smartphone for basic communication – calls, texts, and very light app usage – and you are operating on an extremely limited budget. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A02 if you prioritize a more fluid user experience, occasional multitasking, and the peace of mind that comes with a more widely recognized brand and potentially more software support. The A02’s RAM options are crucial for avoiding frustrating slowdowns.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Mediatek MT6580 in the Yezz GO 1 sufficient for running WhatsApp and Facebook?
Yes, the MT6580 can handle basic apps like WhatsApp and Facebook, but performance will be sluggish, especially if multiple apps are open. Expect delays when switching between apps and loading content. The limited RAM in the Yezz GO 1 exacerbates this issue.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A02 support popular mobile games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Samsung Galaxy A02 can *run* PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile, but only at the lowest graphics settings and frame rates. The MT6739W is not a gaming chipset, and the 2GB RAM variant will struggle significantly. The 3GB RAM version offers a slightly better experience, but still won't deliver a smooth gaming experience.
❓ What type of storage does the Samsung Galaxy A02 use, and is it expandable?
The Samsung Galaxy A02 uses eMMC storage, which is typical for this price range. It is expandable via a microSD card slot, allowing you to add up to 512GB of additional storage for photos, videos, and other files. This is crucial given the limited internal storage options (32GB or 64GB).
❓ How does the software support compare between Yezz and Samsung?
Samsung generally provides longer software support and more frequent updates than smaller brands like Yezz. While neither phone is likely to receive major Android version updates, the Galaxy A02 is more likely to receive security patches, improving its long-term security.
