The Yezz GO 1 and Energizer Energy E10+ represent the extreme lower end of the smartphone market, targeting users who prioritize basic functionality above all else. While both aim for affordability, significant differences in their underlying hardware dictate vastly different user experiences. This comparison dissects those differences to determine which device offers the best value for the money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user needing a functional smartphone for basic tasks, the Yezz GO 1 is the better choice. Its Mediatek MT6580 chipset, while dated, provides a significantly more capable CPU than the Energizer Energy E10+'s MT6261D, resulting in a smoother, more responsive experience. The E10+ is limited to very basic functionality.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | - |
| EDGE | - | No |
| GPRS | - | Class 12 |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps | - |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, February. Released 2020, July 28 | 2018, July. Released 2018, July |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 128.5 x 65.2 x 11 mm (5.06 x 2.57 x 0.43 in) | 110 x 47 x 14.3 mm (4.33 x 1.85 x 0.56 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Mini-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 123 g (4.34 oz) | 69 g (2.43 oz) |
| | - | Flashlight |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~233 ppi density) | 128 x 160 pixels (~114 ppi density) |
| Size | 4.0 inches, 45.5 cm2 (~54.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 1.8 inches, 10.2 cm2 (~19.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD | TFT, 256K colors |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz | - |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6580 (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6261D |
| GPU | Mali-400 | - |
| OS | Android 10 (Go edition) | - |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | - | Yes |
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDHC |
| Internal | 8GB 1GB RAM | 4MB 4MB RAM |
| Phonebook | - | Yes |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, Panorama, HDR | - |
| Single | 5 MP | VGA |
| Video | 720p | No |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 2 MP | VGA |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP, LE | 3.0 |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | No |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | No |
| Features |
|---|
| Games | - | No |
| Java | - | No |
| Messaging | - | SMS |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | - | Up to 125 h (3G) |
| Talk time | - | Up to 7 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Ion 1400 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 1000 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | - | About 10 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.95 W/kg (body) |
Yezz GO 1
- More powerful processor (MT6580)
- Better overall performance
- More responsive user experience
- Likely limited software support
- Low-resolution camera
Energizer Energy E10+
- Extremely low cost
- Potentially longer standby time
- Simple, no-frills experience
- Severely limited performance (MT6261D)
- Poor app compatibility
- Laggy user interface
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the lack of detailed display specifications, we can assume both utilize low-cost LCD panels. However, the Yezz GO 1's more powerful chipset suggests it may be able to drive a slightly higher resolution or refresh rate, though this remains speculative. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both devices, reflecting their budget nature. Color accuracy is expected to be basic on both.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance on both devices is expected to be extremely limited. Without specific sensor details, it's safe to assume both feature low-resolution sensors. Any marketing materials touting camera capabilities should be viewed with extreme skepticism. The Yezz GO 1’s more powerful processor *might* allow for slightly faster image processing, but the underlying sensor quality will be the primary limiting factor. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing gimmick, offering minimal practical benefit.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Yezz GO 1’s Mediatek MT6580, a quad-core 1.3 GHz processor built on a 28nm process, offers significantly more processing power than the Energizer Energy E10+'s Mediatek MT6261D. The MT6261D is a very basic chipset primarily designed for feature phones, and its inclusion in a smartphone suggests severely limited performance. The Yezz GO 1 will handle basic Android tasks like web browsing and social media with considerably less lag. The MT6580 also benefits from a more mature software ecosystem and driver support, further enhancing its usability. The E10+ will struggle with even moderately demanding apps.
Battery Life
Battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns. While specific battery capacities are not provided, the less powerful MT6261D in the Energizer Energy E10+ will likely result in longer standby times. However, the Yezz GO 1’s more capable processor will drain the battery faster during active use. Charging speeds are also likely to be slow on both devices, given their budget nature. The E10+'s lower power draw may offset a smaller battery capacity in certain scenarios.
Buying Guide
Buy the Yezz GO 1 if you need a smartphone capable of running more than just the most basic apps, and require a degree of responsiveness for tasks like web browsing or light social media use. Buy the Energizer Energy E10+ if your needs are *extremely* limited – primarily making and receiving calls and sending basic text messages – and you prioritize a simple, no-frills experience above all else. The E10+ is essentially a feature phone with Android's interface.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Energizer Energy E10+ be able to run popular apps like WhatsApp or Facebook smoothly?
The Energizer Energy E10+'s Mediatek MT6261D chipset is extremely limited in processing power. While it *may* be able to run these apps, expect significant lag and a frustrating user experience. It's likely to struggle with even basic functionality within these applications.
❓ Is the Yezz GO 1 suitable for playing mobile games?
The Yezz GO 1 is not designed for gaming. While it can handle very simple games, more demanding titles will likely be unplayable due to the MT6580's limited GPU capabilities and the device's overall low specifications. Expect low frame rates and frequent stuttering.
❓ What version of Android does the Yezz GO 1 run, and will it receive updates?
Given its specifications, the Yezz GO 1 likely runs Android Go Edition, a lightweight version of Android designed for devices with limited resources. Software update support is likely to be minimal or non-existent, as manufacturers often do not provide long-term updates for ultra-budget devices.
❓ Is the Energizer Energy E10+ a good option for someone who primarily needs a phone for calls and texts?
Yes, the Energizer Energy E10+ is a reasonable option *only* if your primary need is basic voice calls and text messaging. Its limited processing power is less of an issue for these core functions, and its lower power consumption may result in longer battery life for standby use.
