Yezz targets the ultra-budget smartphone market with the C32 and Max 3 Ultra. While both aim to deliver affordability, they differ significantly in their internal hardware. This comparison dissects those differences, focusing on how the Unisoc chipsets impact performance and user experience, helping you determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Yezz Max 3 Ultra is the better choice. Its 1.4 GHz quad-core processor on the SC9832E chipset provides a noticeable performance boost over the C32’s 1.0 GHz dual-core T107, making it more responsive for everyday tasks. The inclusion of 10W charging is also a practical advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 3, 4, 7, 28 | 2, 3, 4, 7, 12, 17, 28 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August | 2022, September |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August | Available. Released 2023, January |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 121 x 50 x 12.8 mm (4.76 x 1.97 x 0.50 in) | 159.7 x 77.3 x 9.9 mm (6.29 x 3.04 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | INX Glass |
| Resolution | 128 x 160 pixels (~116 ppi density) | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 1.77 inches, 9.9 cm2 (~16.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.26 inches, 97.8 cm2 (~79.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT, 256K colors | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7 | Quad-core 1.4 GHz |
| Chipset | Unisoc T107 (22 nm) | Unisoc SC9832E (28 nm) |
| GPU | - | Mali-T820 MP1 |
| OS | - | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | Yes | - |
| Card slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128MB 48MB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| Phonebook | Yes | - |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, AF
0.3 MP |
| Features | - | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 0.08 MP | - |
| Video | QVGA | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | - | 8 MP |
| Video | - | Yes |
| | No | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio | Stereo FM radio, recording |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | No | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Games | No | - |
| Java | No | - |
| Messaging | SMS | - |
| Sensors | - | Fingerprint (rear-mounted) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 1000 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 3700 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Red, Blue | Artic Blue, Aqua Green, Turquoise Green |
| Price | - | About 100 EUR |
Yezz C32
- Potentially lower price point
- Simpler user experience for basic tasks
- May be more readily available in certain regions
- Significantly slower processor
- Less responsive for multitasking
- Likely shorter battery life under load
Yezz Max 3 Ultra
- Faster quad-core processor
- 10W wired charging support
- More responsive user experience
- Potentially higher price
- May not be available in all markets
- Still limited by budget chipset
Display Comparison
Neither Yezz provides display specifications beyond size. Given the price point, both likely utilize LCD panels with 720p resolution. The Max 3 Ultra’s slightly higher processing power *could* translate to smoother scrolling, but this is heavily dependent on software optimization. Expect similar color accuracy and viewing angles on both, with neither likely supporting features like HDR or high refresh rates. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are unavailable. However, given the target market, both devices likely feature basic camera setups. It’s safe to assume both will struggle in low-light conditions. The absence of information suggests neither phone boasts advanced features like optical image stabilization (OIS) or high-resolution sensors. Any 2MP macro lens included on either device is likely to produce images of limited quality and should not be a deciding factor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Yezz Max 3 Ultra’s Unisoc SC9832E, with its quad-core configuration clocked at 1.4 GHz, represents a significant upgrade over the Yezz C32’s Unisoc T107 (1.0 GHz dual-core). The SC9832E’s additional cores will handle multitasking and more demanding apps with greater ease. The T107, built on a 22nm process, is less efficient than the SC9832E’s 28nm node, potentially leading to slightly shorter battery life under load. While neither chipset is a powerhouse, the Max 3 Ultra will offer a demonstrably smoother user experience.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Yezz Max 3 Ultra’s inclusion of 10W wired charging is a clear advantage. While not fast charging by modern standards, it will significantly reduce charging times compared to a device without dedicated charging support. The more efficient SC9832E chipset may also contribute to slightly longer battery life, but this will depend heavily on usage patterns.
Buying Guide
Buy the Yezz C32 if your primary need is an extremely basic phone for calls, texts, and light app usage, and you prioritize minimizing cost above all else. Buy the Yezz Max 3 Ultra if you want a more fluid experience for social media, web browsing, and occasional gaming, and appreciate the convenience of faster charging, even if it means a slightly higher price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Yezz Max 3 Ultra be able to run popular social media apps like Facebook and Instagram smoothly?
The Unisoc SC9832E chipset in the Max 3 Ultra is better equipped to handle the demands of social media apps compared to the C32’s T107. While it won’t offer a flagship-level experience, you should expect acceptable performance for browsing feeds, posting updates, and viewing photos and videos.
❓ Is the Yezz C32 suitable for someone who primarily uses their phone for making calls and sending texts?
Yes, the Yezz C32 is perfectly adequate for basic communication tasks like calls and texts. Its simpler processor and software will prioritize battery life for these core functions, making it a viable option for users with minimal smartphone needs.
❓ Can either of these phones handle basic mobile games?
The Yezz Max 3 Ultra will provide a slightly better gaming experience due to its more powerful processor. However, don't expect to play graphically intensive games at high settings. Both phones are best suited for casual games and older titles.
