The Yezz C32 and Yezz GO 3 represent the ultra-budget end of the Android smartphone spectrum. Both devices aim to provide essential smartphone functionality at the lowest possible price point. However, a closer look at their core components reveals a key difference: the chipset. This comparison will dissect the implications of the Unisoc T107 in the C32 versus the SC7731e in the GO 3, helping you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness in basic tasks like calling, texting, and light web browsing, the Yezz GO 3 is the better choice. Its quad-core 1.3 GHz CPU offers a noticeable performance advantage over the C32’s single-core 1.0 GHz processor, making everyday interactions smoother.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 3, 4, 7, 28 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August | 2021, April. Released 2021, August |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 121 x 50 x 12.8 mm (4.76 x 1.97 x 0.50 in) | 125.7 x 63.5 x 9 mm (4.95 x 2.5 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 84.5 g (3.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | AGC glass |
| Resolution | 128 x 160 pixels (~116 ppi density) | 360 x 640 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~184 ppi density) |
| Size | 1.77 inches, 9.9 cm2 (~16.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 4.0 inches, 44.1 cm2 (~55.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT, 256K colors | OLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7 | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 |
| Chipset | Unisoc T107 (22 nm) | Unisoc SC7731e |
| GPU | - | Mali-400 MP2 |
| OS | - | Android 11 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | Yes | - |
| Card slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128MB 48MB RAM | 8GB 1GB RAM |
| Phonebook | Yes | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash, Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 0.08 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | QVGA | 720p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | - | 2 MP |
| | No | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | No | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Games | No | - |
| Java | No | - |
| Messaging | SMS | - |
| Sensors | - | N/A |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 1000 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 1350 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Red, Blue | Black, Blue, Green |
| Price | - | About 50 EUR |
Yezz C32
- Potentially lower price point
- Simple and straightforward operation
- Adequate for basic calling and texting
- Significantly slower performance
- Limited multitasking capabilities
- Aging processor architecture
Yezz GO 3
- Faster quad-core processor
- More responsive user experience
- Better for basic multitasking
- May be slightly more expensive
- Still an entry-level device
- Camera quality likely similar to C32
Display Comparison
Neither Yezz provides display specifications. Given the price point, both likely utilize low-resolution LCD panels. Expect limited brightness and narrow viewing angles on both devices. Color accuracy is unlikely to be a priority, and both will likely feature significant bezels. The display experience will be functional, but not a standout feature on either phone.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are likely to feature basic camera setups. Without specific sensor details, it's safe to assume both will struggle in low-light conditions. Image quality will be acceptable for casual snapshots, but don't expect detailed or vibrant photos. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely marketing fluff; its limited resolution and lack of optical image stabilization will result in blurry and unusable close-up shots. Focus should be on the main sensor, but without specs, it's impossible to determine which device has an advantage.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Yezz C32’s Unisoc T107, built on a 22nm process, features a single 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7 core. This architecture is aging and struggles with even moderate multitasking. The Yezz GO 3, however, utilizes the Unisoc SC7731e, a quad-core processor clocked at 1.3 GHz, also based on Cortex-A7 cores. While still an entry-level architecture, the four cores provide a significant advantage in parallel processing, resulting in smoother app switching and a more responsive user interface. The 1.3 GHz clock speed further contributes to this improved performance. Users who frequently open multiple apps or browse the web will find the GO 3 noticeably faster.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. Given the low-power chipsets, both should offer at least a full day of standby time and moderate usage. Charging wattage is also unknown, but likely to be slow (5W or less) via Micro-USB. The slightly more efficient SC7731e in the GO 3 *might* translate to marginally longer battery life, but the difference will likely be minimal in real-world scenarios.
Buying Guide
Buy the Yezz C32 if you absolutely need the lowest possible price and your smartphone usage is extremely limited to essential communication. It's suitable for those who primarily need a device for calls and texts. Buy the Yezz GO 3 if you want a more responsive experience for basic multitasking, social media, and occasional web browsing. The extra processing power provides a more fluid user experience without a significant price premium.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Yezz GO 3 be able to run popular social media apps like Facebook and WhatsApp smoothly?
Yes, the quad-core processor in the Yezz GO 3 provides enough processing power to run Facebook, WhatsApp, and similar social media apps without significant lag. While it won't offer a high-end experience, it will be usable and responsive for basic social media interactions.
❓ Is the Unisoc T107 in the Yezz C32 sufficient for checking emails and making calls?
Yes, the Unisoc T107 is adequate for basic tasks like checking emails and making calls. However, expect delays when opening apps or switching between them. It's best suited for users who primarily need a phone for communication and don't require multitasking capabilities.
❓ Can either of these phones handle basic web browsing?
Both phones can handle basic web browsing, but the Yezz GO 3 will provide a smoother experience. The C32’s single-core processor may struggle with loading complex web pages or running multiple browser tabs simultaneously.
❓ What type of charging port do these phones use?
Given the budget nature of these devices, both the Yezz C32 and Yezz GO 3 likely use a Micro-USB port for charging and data transfer. Expect slower charging speeds compared to modern USB-C ports.
