Yezz Art 3 Pro vs. Yezz Billy 4.7: A Deep Dive into Budget Smartphone Performance

The Yezz Art 3 Pro and Billy 4.7 represent opposite ends of the entry-level smartphone spectrum. The Art 3 Pro aims for a balance of features and performance, while the Billy 4.7 prioritizes affordability above all else. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which device delivers the best value for your money.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user seeking a responsive experience, the Yezz Art 3 Pro is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Helio G85 chipset offers significantly superior processing power compared to the Snapdragon 200 in the Billy 4.7, making it better suited for multitasking and even light gaming. While the Billy 4.7 is cheaper, the performance trade-off is substantial.

PHONES
Phone Names Yezz Art 3 Pro Yezz Billy 4.7
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - SIM 1
4G bands2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 17, 28-
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA
Launch
Announced2022, September2014, May. Released 2014, July
StatusAvailable. Released 2023, JanuaryDiscontinued
Body
Dimensions162 x 75.2 x 9 mm (6.38 x 2.96 x 0.35 in)135.8 x 67.2 x 7.2 mm (5.35 x 2.65 x 0.28 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMDual SIM (Micro-SIM)
Weight201 g (7.09 oz)120 g (4.23 oz)
Display
ProtectionAsahi GlassAsahi Dragontrail Glass
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~406 ppi density)720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~312 ppi density)
Size6.49 inches, 101.7 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio)4.7 inches, 60.9 cm2 (~66.7% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Quad-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7
ChipsetMediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)Qualcomm MSM8212 Snapdragon 200 (28 nm)
GPUMali-G52 MC2Adreno 302
OSAndroid 12Microsoft Windows Phone 8.1
Memory
Card slotmicroSDHCmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM8GB 1GB RAM
 -eMMC 4.5
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, panorama, HDR
Single-8 MP, AF
Triple48 MP, AF 8 MP 0.3 MP-
Video1080p@30fps720p@30fps
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDR-
Single16 MP2 MP
VideoYes-
Sound
3.5mm jack NoYes
35mm jackNoYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE4.0, A2DP
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPSGPS, GLONASS
RadioStereo FM radio, recordingStereo FM radio
USBUSB Type-C 2.0microUSB 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, hotspot
Features
SensorsFingerprint (rear-mounted)Accelerometer, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging10W wired-
Stand-by-Up to 480 h (2G) / Up to 350 h (3G)
Talk time-Up to 16 h (2G) / Up to 7 h 30 min (3G)
TypeLi-Po 5000 mAhLi-Ion 1780 mAh, removable
Misc
ColorsSnow White, Space BlackWhite, Red, Blue
PriceAbout 160 EUR-

Yezz Art 3 Pro

  • Significantly faster processor (Helio G85)
  • More efficient chipset (12nm process)
  • Potentially better display quality

  • Limited information available on display specs
  • 10W charging is relatively slow

Yezz Billy 4.7

  • Extremely affordable
  • Compact 4.7-inch screen size
  • Simple and easy to use

  • Very slow processor (Snapdragon 200)
  • Inefficient chipset (28nm process)
  • Limited functionality

Display Comparison

Details regarding the displays of both devices are unavailable. However, given the Billy 4.7's focus on cost reduction, it likely utilizes a lower-resolution panel with narrower viewing angles. The Art 3 Pro, positioned slightly higher, may feature a more vibrant display, though specifics like brightness and color accuracy remain unknown. The 4.7-inch screen size of the Billy 4.7 suggests a more compact form factor, appealing to users who prefer smaller phones.

Camera Comparison

Camera specifications beyond the presence of cameras are unavailable for either device. Given the price points, both are likely to feature basic camera sensors. The Art 3 Pro, being the slightly more premium option, *may* have a higher resolution main sensor and potentially better image processing capabilities. However, users should temper expectations; both cameras will likely struggle in low-light conditions and lack advanced features like optical image stabilization (OIS). The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device would be largely for marketing purposes, offering minimal practical benefit.

Performance

The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Yezz Art 3 Pro’s Mediatek Helio G85, built on a 12nm process, features an octa-core CPU (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) designed for efficient multitasking and moderate gaming. In contrast, the Yezz Billy 4.7’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 200, fabricated on a less efficient 28nm node, has only four cores clocked at 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7. This architectural difference translates to significantly slower app loading times, sluggish UI navigation, and an inability to handle demanding applications on the Billy 4.7. The Helio G85’s Cortex-A75 cores provide a noticeable performance boost over the older Cortex-A7 cores in the Snapdragon 200.

Battery Life

Battery capacity details are missing for both devices. However, the Art 3 Pro’s more efficient chipset (12nm vs 28nm) suggests it will likely deliver better battery life despite potentially having a similar or even smaller battery capacity. The Art 3 Pro’s 10W wired charging is a standard offering for this price range, and while not fast, it’s sufficient for overnight charging. The Billy 4.7’s charging speed is unknown, but likely similar or slower, given its cost-focused design.

Buying Guide

Buy the Yezz Art 3 Pro if you need a smartphone capable of handling everyday tasks smoothly, enjoy occasional gaming, and appreciate a more modern processor. Buy the Yezz Billy 4.7 if your primary needs are basic communication – calls and texts – and you prioritize the absolute lowest possible price point, accepting significant limitations in performance and responsiveness.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Yezz Billy 4.7 struggle with popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook?
Yes, the Snapdragon 200 processor in the Billy 4.7 is quite limited. While it can technically run these apps, you'll likely experience significant lag, slow loading times, and occasional crashes, especially with multiple apps open.
❓ Is the Yezz Art 3 Pro capable of playing mobile games?
The Helio G85 in the Art 3 Pro can handle many popular mobile games, but don't expect high frame rates or maximum graphics settings. It's best suited for less demanding titles or playing games with reduced settings. More graphically intensive games may experience some stuttering.
❓ How much storage do these phones likely have, and is it expandable?
Storage details are unavailable, but both phones likely come with minimal internal storage (8GB or 16GB). Given the target market, both *should* include a microSD card slot for storage expansion, but this isn't guaranteed.
❓ What Android version do these phones run?
Given their specifications, it's likely the Yezz Billy 4.7 runs an older version of Android (potentially Android 10 or 11), while the Art 3 Pro may run a slightly newer version (Android 12 or 13). Software updates are unlikely to be frequent or extensive on either device.