The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for your money. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the Yezz Art 3 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A20. Both promise a lot, but which one delivers the best overall experience?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A20 edges out the Yezz Art 3 Pro thanks to its slightly faster charging, more established brand reputation, and generally better software support. While the Yezz offers a competitive chipset, Samsung's overall package provides a more polished and reliable experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 17, 28 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 - SM-A205U |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, September | 2019, March 19. Released 2019, April 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162 x 75.2 x 9 mm (6.38 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) | 158.4 x 74.7 x 7.8 mm (6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 169 g (5.96 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~406 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~268 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.49 inches, 101.7 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A73 & 6x1.35 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Exynos 7884 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G71 MP2 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, One UI 3.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDHC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/1.9, 28mm (wide), AF
5 MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 48 MP, AF
8 MP
0.3 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted) | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Snow White, Space Black | Black, Deep Blue, Red, Coral Orange, Gold |
| Models | - | SM-A205F, SM-A205FN, SM-A205GN, SM-A205YN, SM-A205G, SM-A205W, SM-A205U, SM-A205S, SM-S205DL, SM-A205U1 |
| Price | About 160 EUR | About 100 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.60 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.23 W/kg (head) 1.38 W/kg (body) |
Yezz Art 3 Pro
- Potentially better raw performance (Helio G85)
- Competitive price
- Decent RAM and storage options (likely)
- Less established brand
- Slower charging (10W)
- Likely LCD display
- Potentially less software support
Samsung Galaxy A20
- Super AMOLED display
- Faster charging (15W)
- Samsung's brand reputation and software support
- Generally better camera performance
- Slightly less powerful chipset than Yezz Art 3 Pro
- Can be pricier than Yezz Art 3 Pro
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A20 boasts a 6.4-inch Super AMOLED display, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks, a significant advantage over the Yezz Art 3 Pro's likely LCD panel (specifications are not readily available, but typical for this price range). Resolution is likely similar, but the AMOLED technology provides a noticeably better viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A20 typically features a more versatile camera system with a wider range of features and better image processing. While the Yezz Art 3 Pro may have decent camera hardware, Samsung's software algorithms generally produce more pleasing results, especially in challenging lighting conditions. Expect better video recording capabilities on the A20.
Performance
The Yezz Art 3 Pro's Helio G85 chipset generally outperforms the Exynos 7884 in raw CPU and GPU benchmarks. However, Samsung's software optimization often results in a smoother, more responsive user experience despite the slightly less powerful hardware. Real-world performance will depend on usage patterns.
Battery Life
Both phones offer a large 4000mAh battery, providing all-day battery life for moderate users. The Samsung Galaxy A20's 15W charging is slightly faster than the Yezz Art 3 Pro's 10W charging, reducing charging times.
Buying Guide
The Yezz Art 3 Pro is a good choice for users prioritizing raw processing power on a tight budget and are comfortable with a less well-known brand. The Samsung Galaxy A20 is ideal for those seeking a reliable, well-supported device with a good balance of features and performance, and prefer the Samsung ecosystem.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Yezz Art 3 Pro's Helio G85 chipset generally offers better raw gaming performance, but the Samsung Galaxy A20's software optimization can sometimes compensate.
❓ How long does the battery last on each phone?
Both phones offer all-day battery life with moderate usage. Expect around 8-10 hours of screen-on time.
