The Yezz Art 3 Lite and Samsung Galaxy A03 Core represent the absolute bottom end of the smartphone market, targeting users prioritizing affordability above all else. Both rely on Unisoc chipsets, but differ significantly in core count and overall architecture. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the most usable experience for the price.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core emerges as the better choice. Its octa-core processor, despite sharing the same 28nm process as the Yezz Art 3 Lite’s quad-core chip, provides a noticeable performance advantage in multitasking and app responsiveness, making it a more fluid daily driver.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 3, 4, 7, 12, 17, 28 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June | 2021, November 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September | Available. Released 2021, December 06 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 167.9 x 76.8 x 10.5 mm (6.61 x 3.02 x 0.41 in) | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 154 g (5.43 oz) | 211 g (7.44 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~79.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.4 GHz | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9832E (28 nm) | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-T820 MP1 | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 11 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, AF
0.3 MP | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | Yes | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, recording | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted) | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired, PD | - |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Onyx Black, Majestic Blue, Emerald Green | Black, Blue |
| Models | - | SM-A032F, SM-A032F/DS, SM-A032M |
| Price | About 120 EUR | £ 74.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.30 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.24 W/kg (head) 1.39 W/kg (body) |
Yezz Art 3 Lite
- Potentially lower price point
- PD support for 10W charging
- Compact form factor (likely)
- Quad-core processor limits performance
- Likely inferior camera quality
- Less brand recognition
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
- Octa-core processor for smoother performance
- Samsung brand recognition and software
- Potentially better battery efficiency
- May be slightly more expensive
- Likely includes unnecessary 2MP macro camera
- Charging speed unknown
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the lack of detailed display specs, we can assume both utilize basic LCD panels. The focus here is on usability, and the A03 Core’s slightly larger screen real estate (likely, given typical Samsung designs) may offer a marginally better viewing experience. Both will likely suffer from narrow viewing angles and limited brightness, making outdoor visibility a challenge.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance on both devices will be limited. Without detailed sensor information, it’s safe to assume both feature low-resolution primary sensors. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the A03 Core is largely marketing fluff; its image quality will be poor. The A03 Core may benefit from Samsung’s image processing algorithms, potentially offering slightly more pleasing results in good lighting conditions, but don’t expect flagship-level photography. The Yezz Art 3 Lite’s camera is likely to be a more basic implementation.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipset: the Yezz Art 3 Lite uses the Unisoc SC9832E with a quad-core CPU clocked at 1.4 GHz, while the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core features the Unisoc SC9863A with an octa-core configuration (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55). This is a significant architectural advantage for the A03 Core. While both are built on a 28nm process, the eight cores allow for better parallel processing, resulting in smoother app launches and improved multitasking. The Cortex-A55 cores in the A03 Core, even at lower clock speeds, are more efficient than the cores likely found in the SC9832E, translating to better sustained performance. Gamers should temper expectations on both devices, but the A03 Core will handle less demanding titles with greater stability.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, given their price point, both likely house batteries in the 3000-4000 mAh range. The Yezz Art 3 Lite supports 10W wired charging with Power Delivery (PD), a welcome inclusion at this price. The A03 Core’s charging speed is unknown, but likely similar. The A03 Core’s more efficient processor may translate to slightly better battery life, offsetting any potential capacity differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the Yezz Art 3 Lite if you need a secondary device for extremely basic tasks like calls and messaging, and prioritize a potentially lower price point. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core if you prefer a more responsive user experience, even for light multitasking, and value the Samsung brand recognition and software support, even if limited.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc SC9863A in the Galaxy A03 Core struggle with popular apps like Facebook or WhatsApp?
While the SC9863A isn't a powerhouse, its octa-core architecture should handle Facebook and WhatsApp without significant issues. Expect some slowdown with multiple apps open simultaneously, but for basic social media usage, it's sufficient. The Yezz Art 3 Lite's quad-core processor will likely exhibit more noticeable lag.
❓ Is the 10W PD charging on the Yezz Art 3 Lite a significant advantage?
The inclusion of Power Delivery (PD) is a positive, ensuring compatibility with a wider range of chargers. However, 10W charging is still relatively slow. Expect a full charge to take several hours on both devices. The benefit lies in the potential for faster charging with a compatible PD charger, rather than the wattage itself.
❓ Can either of these phones handle basic mobile gaming like Candy Crush or Subway Surfers?
Both phones can handle less demanding games like Candy Crush or Subway Surfers, but don't expect high frame rates or detailed graphics. The Samsung Galaxy A03 Core will likely provide a smoother experience due to its more powerful processor. More graphically intensive games will likely be unplayable or suffer from severe lag.
❓ What kind of software support can I expect from Yezz compared to Samsung?
Samsung generally provides longer software support, even for its budget devices, offering occasional security updates. Yezz’s software support is typically limited, with fewer updates and a shorter lifespan. This means the A03 Core is more likely to receive security patches, protecting against vulnerabilities.
