Yezz Art 3 Lite vs Motorola Moto E7i Power: A Deep Dive into Budget Performance

The ultra-budget smartphone segment is fiercely competitive. Both the Yezz Art 3 Lite and Motorola Moto E7i Power aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at the lowest possible price. However, beneath the similar price points lie significant differences in processing power and overall user experience. This comparison dissects those differences to determine which device offers the best value.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and multitasking, the Motorola Moto E7i Power is the clear winner. Its octa-core Unisoc SC9863A chipset provides a substantial performance uplift over the Yezz Art 3 Lite’s quad-core SC9832E, making everyday tasks smoother and more enjoyable. While both offer basic functionality, the E7i Power delivers a more future-proof experience.

PHONES
Phone Names Yezz Art 3 Lite Motorola Moto E7i Power
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands2, 3, 4, 7, 12, 17, 28LTE
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2022, June2021, February 23
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, SeptemberAvailable. Released 2021, March 15
Body
Build-Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame
Dimensions167.9 x 76.8 x 10.5 mm (6.61 x 3.02 x 0.41 in)165.1 x 75.9 x 9.2 mm (6.5 x 2.99 x 0.36 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight154 g (5.43 oz)200 g (7.05 oz)
 -Water-repellent design
Display
ProtectionPanda Glass-
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density)720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density)
Size6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~79.6% screen-to-body ratio)6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD, 380 nits (typ)
Platform
CPUQuad-core 1.4 GHzOcta-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetUnisoc SC9832E (28 nm)Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm)
GPUMali-T820 MP1IMG8322
OSAndroid 11 (Go edition)Android 10 (Go edition)
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal64GB 2GB RAM32GB 2GB RAM
 -eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
Dual13 MP, AF 0.3 MP13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro)
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR
Single8 MP5 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1.12µm
VideoYes1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth4.2, A2DP, LE4.2, A2DP
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO
RadioStereo FM radio, recordingUnspecified
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/nWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n
Features
SensorsFingerprint (rear-mounted)Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity
Battery
Charging10W wired, PD10W wired
TypeLi-Po 5000 mAhLi-Ion 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsOnyx Black, Majestic Blue, Emerald GreenTahiti Blue, Coral Red
Models-XT2097-13
PriceAbout 120 EURAbout 120 EUR

Yezz Art 3 Lite

  • Potentially lower price point
  • Simple and straightforward user experience
  • Functional for basic tasks

  • Significantly slower processor
  • Limited multitasking capabilities
  • May struggle with modern app demands

Motorola Moto E7i Power

  • Faster octa-core processor
  • Improved multitasking performance
  • More responsive user experience

  • May be slightly more expensive
  • 10W charging is slow
  • Camera performance is likely basic

Display Comparison

Neither device boasts a standout display. Both utilize panels manufactured for cost-effectiveness, and detailed specifications like resolution and brightness are not provided. However, given the target market, we can assume both are 720p LCDs. The focus here isn't on visual fidelity, but on basic readability. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both devices, maximizing screen real estate within a compact form factor.

Camera Comparison

Camera performance is likely to be similar on both devices, leaning towards basic functionality. Without detailed sensor information, it’s safe to assume both feature a primary camera and potentially a secondary depth or macro sensor. Image processing will be limited, and low-light performance will be subpar. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device further limits image quality in challenging conditions. Focusing on the primary sensor resolution would be more informative than speculating on the utility of any secondary sensors.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto E7i Power’s Unisoc SC9863A is an octa-core processor, featuring four Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and another four at 1.2 GHz. This configuration allows for more efficient multitasking and handling of demanding applications compared to the Yezz Art 3 Lite’s Unisoc SC9832E, a quad-core 1.4 GHz processor. The E7i Power’s architecture, while still entry-level, provides a significant advantage in CPU-intensive tasks. Both chipsets are fabricated on a 28nm process, indicating similar power efficiency concerns, but the E7i Power’s extra cores will draw more power under load.

Battery Life

Both devices feature 10W wired charging, indicating similar charging speeds. While battery capacity isn't specified, the Motorola Moto E7i Power’s more efficient chipset and octa-core architecture may allow for slightly better battery life despite potentially similar capacity. Expect a full charge to take over two hours on both devices. The 10W charging standard is a limitation for both, but typical for this price bracket.

Buying Guide

Buy the Yezz Art 3 Lite if you need a very basic smartphone for calls, texts, and light app usage, and are extremely price-sensitive. It's a functional device for minimal smartphone needs. Buy the Motorola Moto E7i Power if you prefer a more responsive experience for social media, browsing, and occasional gaming, and value having more processing headroom for future app updates and multitasking. The E7i Power offers a better long-term user experience.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Motorola Moto E7i Power struggle with popular apps like Facebook or WhatsApp?
While not a powerhouse, the Moto E7i Power’s octa-core processor should handle Facebook and WhatsApp without significant issues. However, running multiple apps simultaneously or using resource-intensive features within these apps may lead to some slowdown. The Yezz Art 3 Lite would likely struggle more noticeably with these tasks.
❓ Is the 10W charging speed on either phone acceptable for daily use?
10W charging is slow by modern standards, and both phones will take over two hours to fully charge from 0%. This is typical for phones in this price range. It’s best to charge overnight to ensure the phone is ready for the day.
❓ Can the Motorola Moto E7i Power handle light gaming?
The Moto E7i Power can handle very light gaming, such as simple puzzle games or older titles. However, demanding 3D games will likely experience significant frame rate drops and may be unplayable. The Yezz Art 3 Lite would struggle even more with gaming.