The sub-$200 5G smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Yezz Art 2 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A14 5G both aim to deliver affordable connectivity, but they take drastically different approaches to achieving it. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G is the superior choice. Its significantly more powerful Exynos 1330 (or Dimensity 700 depending on region) chipset provides a smoother user experience and better long-term performance, offsetting the slightly slower 15W charging compared to the Yezz Art 2 Pro’s 10W.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 1900 / 850 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 3, 4, 7, 12, 17, 28 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 66, 77 Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April. Released 2021, July | 2023, January 04 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 76.3 x 8.8 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm (6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~82.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - SM-A146BOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - SM-A146P |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) - SM-A146BMediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) - SM-A146P |
| GPU | IMG8322 | Mali-G68 MP2 - SM-A146BMali-G57 MC2 - SM-A146P |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI Core 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - USA onlymicroSDXC (dedicated slot) - International |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/2.0, 1/2.8", AF
2 MP
2 MP | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0 | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, recording | FM radio (Exynos 1330 chipset only), recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired, PD | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Graphite Black, Arctic Blue | Black, Light Green, Dark Red, Silver |
| Models | - | SM-A146B, SM-A146B/DS, SM-A146P, SM-A146P/DS, SM-A146U, SM-A146U1, SM-A146U1/DS, SM-A146W, SM-A146P/N, SM-A146P/DSN, SM-S146VL, SM-A146M |
| Price | About 120 EUR | $ 77.63 / C$ 151.00 / £ 97.00 / € 159.79 / ₹ 14,990 |
| SAR | 0.40 W/kg (head) 0.74 W/kg (body) | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.56 W/kg (head) 1.28 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 130h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1334:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 307886 (v9)
GeekBench: 1727 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Yezz Art 2 Pro
- Faster charging (10W PD)
- Potentially lower price point
- Simple, straightforward Android experience
- Significantly weaker processor
- Less efficient 28nm chipset
- Likely inferior camera performance
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
- More powerful Exynos 1330 or Dimensity 700 chipset
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Better long-term performance and software support
- Slower charging (15W)
- Potentially higher price
- Samsung’s One UI can be resource intensive
Display Comparison
Both devices feature a contrast ratio of 1334:1, suggesting similar image quality in terms of black levels. However, the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 519 nits, significantly brighter than what we'd expect from the Yezz Art 2 Pro, making it more usable outdoors. While neither display is expected to be high-end, the A14 5G’s brightness advantage is a clear win for visibility.
Camera Comparison
Both phones list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Given the price point, image quality will likely be similar in good lighting conditions. However, the A14 5G’s potential for better image processing, thanks to its more powerful chipset, gives it an edge. The Yezz Art 2 Pro’s camera system is likely to struggle with low-light photography and complex scenes. We can assume both devices will include a basic macro camera, but these are generally of limited utility.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G, equipped with either the Exynos 1330 (SM-A146B) or Dimensity 700 (SM-A146P), utilizes more modern CPU cores – Cortex-A78 and A76 – compared to the Yezz Art 2 Pro’s Cortex-A55 cores. The 5nm (Exynos) and 7nm (Dimensity) fabrication processes used in the A14 5G’s chipsets are also far more efficient than the Yezz’s 28nm Unisoc SC9863A, resulting in better performance per watt and reduced thermal throttling. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive overall experience on the Samsung.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 130 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G’s 15W charging is slightly faster than the Yezz Art 2 Pro’s 10W charging. While not a massive difference, the faster charging can be beneficial for users who need to quickly top up their battery. The efficiency gains of the A14 5G’s chipset may also contribute to slightly better real-world battery performance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Yezz Art 2 Pro if you prioritize a slightly faster charging speed and are comfortable with a significantly less powerful processor for basic tasks. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G if you value a responsive user experience, better app performance, and a more future-proof chipset, even if it means a slightly longer charge time. The A14 5G is the better option for anyone planning to use their phone for more than just calls and texts.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1330 in the Galaxy A14 5G overheat during extended gaming sessions?
While the Exynos 1330 isn't a flagship processor, its 5nm fabrication process and efficient thermal design minimize overheating. Expect some warmth during prolonged gaming, but it shouldn't lead to significant performance throttling. The Yezz Art 2 Pro’s Unisoc SC9863A is more likely to throttle under load due to its less efficient 28nm process.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone worth using?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on budget phones offer limited utility. Image quality is often poor, lacking detail and sharpness. They can be fun for experimentation, but don't expect professional-looking macro shots. The A14 5G’s superior image processing might yield slightly better results, but it’s still a marginal improvement.
❓ Which phone is better for running demanding apps like social media and video editing?
The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G is significantly better suited for demanding apps. Its Exynos 1330 or Dimensity 700 chipset, coupled with more modern CPU cores, provides the processing power needed for smoother multitasking and faster app loading times. The Yezz Art 2 Pro’s Unisoc SC9863A will likely struggle with these tasks.
❓ What version of Android do these phones ship with, and how long will they receive updates?
The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G typically ships with a newer version of Android and benefits from Samsung’s commitment to software updates, offering at least a few years of security patches and potentially one major Android version upgrade. The Yezz Art 2 Pro’s update schedule is less predictable, and it may receive fewer updates overall.
