The Yezz Art 1 and Yezz Epic T represent affordable entry points into the Android ecosystem. While both aim for budget-conscious consumers, they diverge significantly in their core processing power. This comparison dissects the differences between the Mediatek MT6739 in the Art 1 and the MT6750 in the Epic T, revealing which device delivers the best experience for everyday tasks and light multitasking.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Yezz Epic T is the superior choice. Its octa-core MT6750 chipset provides a noticeable performance boost over the Art 1’s quad-core MT6739, enabling smoother multitasking and a more responsive user experience. The inclusion of 10W charging is also a practical advantage, despite both phones sharing a similar price bracket.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 1900 / 850 | HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 3, 4, 7, 12, 17, 28 | 2, 4, 7, 17, 28 |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, March. Released 2020, August | 2018, March. Released 2018, April |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 155.2 x 72.9 x 9.7 mm (6.11 x 2.87 x 0.38 in) | 168.8 x 86.5 x 15.9 mm (6.65 x 3.41 x 0.63 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 120 g (4.23 oz) | 469 g (1.03 lb) |
| | - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins)
MIL-STD-810G compliant
Flashlight |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | AGC glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.1 inches, 91.3 cm2 (~80.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~57.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6739 (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6750 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-T720MP2 | Mali-T860MP2 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 7.0 (Nougat) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, AF
0.3 MP | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | 16 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP, LE | 4.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 650 h (3G) |
| Talk time | - | Up to 30 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, removable | Li-Po 9000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Green, Blue | Black |
| Price | About 110 EUR | About 250 EUR |
Yezz Art 1
- Simpler user experience for basic tasks
- Potentially lower price (depending on retailer)
- May have slightly longer standby time due to fewer active cores
- Significantly slower performance in multitasking
- Laggy app switching
- Less responsive user interface
Yezz Epic T
- Faster and smoother performance
- Better multitasking capabilities
- 10W wired charging for quicker top-ups
- Potentially slightly shorter battery life under heavy load
- May be marginally more expensive
- More complex chipset may generate slightly more heat
Display Comparison
Neither Yezz provides display specifications. Given their price point, it’s reasonable to assume both utilize IPS LCD panels with 720p resolution. The absence of details like peak brightness or color gamut makes a direct comparison impossible. However, the Epic T’s more powerful chipset *could* potentially drive a slightly more responsive touch experience, even with a similar panel.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a meaningful comparison is limited. It’s likely both phones feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. The absence of information regarding sensor size or aperture suggests neither will excel in low-light conditions. Any claims of superior image quality will likely stem from software processing rather than hardware differences. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to provide substantial photographic value.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Yezz Art 1’s Mediatek MT6739, built on a 28nm process, features a quad-core Cortex-A53 CPU clocked at 1.5 GHz. The Yezz Epic T steps up to the Mediatek MT6750, also 28nm, but with an octa-core configuration – four cores at 1.5 GHz and four at 1.0 GHz. This architecture allows the Epic T to handle more demanding tasks concurrently. While both utilize Cortex-A53 cores, the additional cores in the Epic T provide a significant advantage in multitasking and app switching. The Epic T will exhibit less lag when running multiple applications simultaneously.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Yezz Epic T’s inclusion of 10W wired charging is a clear advantage. While not fast charging by modern standards, it will significantly reduce charging times compared to a phone lacking any specified charging standard. The MT6750’s more efficient octa-core architecture *may* also contribute to slightly better battery life under moderate usage, despite potentially drawing more power during intensive tasks.
Buying Guide
Buy the Yezz Art 1 if you prioritize simplicity and minimal app usage – it’s suitable for basic calling, texting, and light web browsing. Buy the Yezz Epic T if you need a phone capable of handling multiple apps simultaneously, occasional gaming, or if you simply prefer a more fluid and responsive user interface. The Epic T’s extra cores offer a tangible benefit for power users on a budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Yezz Epic T struggle with popular games like PUBG Mobile?
While the MT6750 isn't a gaming powerhouse, it *will* offer a more playable experience in PUBG Mobile than the MT6739. Expect to run the game at lower graphics settings and potentially experience occasional frame drops, but it will be significantly more functional than on the Art 1.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the MT6739 and MT6750 noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
Yes, the difference is noticeable. The Epic T’s octa-core processor will result in smoother scrolling, faster app loading times, and a more responsive overall experience when browsing the web or using social media apps. The Art 1 may exhibit noticeable lag when switching between these tasks.
❓ Does the Yezz Epic T support software updates?
Given Yezz’s history and the age of the MT6750 chipset, significant software updates are unlikely. Expect security patches to be infrequent, if available at all. Both devices are likely running an older version of Android.
