The Yezz Art 1 and Andy 5T represent the lower end of the smartphone spectrum, targeting users prioritizing affordability. While both devices share a similar price bracket and 28nm manufacturing process, their underlying chipsets – the Mediatek MT6739 and MT6582 respectively – dictate significantly different performance characteristics. This comparison will dissect those differences to determine which device delivers the best experience for basic smartphone tasks.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user needing a functional, if basic, smartphone, the Yezz Art 1 emerges as the slightly better choice. Its Cortex-A53 based MT6739 chipset, despite the similar manufacturing process, offers a modest performance advantage over the older Cortex-A7 in the Andy 5T, resulting in a smoother user experience for everyday apps.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 1900 / 850 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 - AM5TJ047 |
| 4G bands | 2, 3, 4, 7, 12, 17, 28 | - |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA |
| | - | HSDPA 850 / 1900 - AM5TL043 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, March. Released 2020, August | 2014, July. Released 2014, August |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 155.2 x 72.9 x 9.7 mm (6.11 x 2.87 x 0.38 in) | 144 x 69.7 x 6.9 mm (5.67 x 2.74 x 0.27 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Mini-SIM/ Micro-SIM) |
| Weight | 120 g (4.23 oz) | 123 g (4.34 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | AGC glass | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~294 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.1 inches, 91.3 cm2 (~80.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~68.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6739 (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6582 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-T720MP2 | Mali-400MP2 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 (KitKat) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 4GB 1GB RAM (AM5TJ047), 8GB 1GB RAM (AM5TL043) |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, AF
0.3 MP | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | 8 MP, AF (AM5TJ047)
13.1 MP, AF (AM5TL043) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP, LE | 4.0, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio | Stereo FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | - | Up to 480 h (2G) / Up to 360 h (3G) |
| Talk time | - | Up to 16 h (2G) / Up to 8 h 30 min (3G) |
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, removable | Li-Po 1800 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Green, Blue | White, Black, Blue, Red |
| Price | About 110 EUR | - |
Yezz Art 1
- More modern CPU architecture (Cortex-A53)
- Potentially better multitasking performance
- Likely supports more modern connectivity
- May have slightly higher power consumption
- No specific details on display quality
Yezz Andy 5T
- Potentially slightly better battery life (due to less powerful CPU)
- Lower price point (likely)
- Older CPU architecture (Cortex-A7)
- Slower performance and more noticeable lag
- Limited future software support
Display Comparison
Unfortunately, display specifications are not provided. However, given the target market, both devices likely feature 720p LCD panels. The absence of information prevents a comparison of brightness, color accuracy, or viewing angles. It's reasonable to assume both displays prioritize power efficiency over visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent, making a direct comparison impossible. Given the price point, both devices likely feature basic camera sensors. Without knowing megapixel counts or aperture values, it’s safe to assume image quality will be limited, particularly in low-light conditions. Any included 'macro' or 'depth' sensors are likely to be of very low resolution and offer minimal benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Yezz Art 1’s Mediatek MT6739, featuring a quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 CPU, benefits from a newer CPU architecture compared to the Andy 5T’s MT6582 with its 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 cores. While both are 28nm, the Cortex-A53 offers improved instructions per clock cycle (IPC) and generally better multi-core performance. This translates to faster app loading times and smoother multitasking on the Art 1. The MT6739 also supports more modern connectivity features, though specifics aren't available. The Andy 5T's older architecture will likely exhibit more noticeable lag when switching between applications.
Battery Life
Battery capacity and charging wattage are not specified. However, the MT6739 in the Art 1, while more powerful, may also consume slightly more power. The actual battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns. Without charging information, it's impossible to determine which device offers faster charging speeds. Both will likely require overnight charging for a full top-up.
Buying Guide
Buy the Yezz Art 1 if you need a phone capable of handling slightly more demanding tasks like light web browsing and social media without significant lag. It's the better option for users who anticipate using a few more apps concurrently. Buy the Yezz Andy 5T if your primary needs are limited to calls, texts, and very basic app usage; it represents a minimal viable smartphone experience and may be preferable if cost is the absolute primary concern.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Yezz Art 1 handle popular social media apps like Facebook and WhatsApp smoothly?
The Yezz Art 1, with its Cortex-A53 processor, is more likely to handle Facebook and WhatsApp without significant lag compared to the Andy 5T. While not a high-performance experience, it should provide a usable experience for these core applications.
❓ Is either phone likely to receive Android updates?
Given the budget nature of both devices and Yezz's brand history, it's highly unlikely that either the Art 1 or the Andy 5T will receive major Android updates. Expect limited security patches at best.
❓ Can the Yezz Art 1 play basic games like Candy Crush or Angry Birds?
Yes, the Yezz Art 1 should be capable of running simple games like Candy Crush or Angry Birds without major issues. However, don't expect to play graphically demanding games; the MT6739 is not a gaming chipset.
