Google Pixel 7a vs. Yezz Art 1 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 7a is the superior choice. Its Google Tensor G2 chipset delivers significantly faster performance and superior image processing, justifying the price difference. However, the Yezz Art 1 Pro offers a functional smartphone experience for those prioritizing absolute affordability.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Yezz Art 1 Pro | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 1900 / 850 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 3, 4, 7, 12, 17, 28 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, August. Released 2020, November | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 77.9 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 3.07 x 0.35 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 120 g (4.23 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~263 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762D Helio A25 (12 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/2.8, 1/2.8", AF 2 MP 2 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.4, 1/4.0" | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | - | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired, PD | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Stellar Blue | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | - | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 100 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
| SAR | 0.40 W/kg (head) 0.74 W/kg (body) | - |
Yezz Art 1 Pro
- Significantly faster performance with Tensor G2
- Superior camera quality and image processing
- Longer battery life and faster charging (including wireless)
- Access to Google’s AI features and software updates
- Higher price point
- May be slightly larger and heavier
Google Pixel 7a
- Extremely affordable price
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Potentially more compact design
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- Slow performance with Helio A25
- Inferior camera quality
- Slow charging speed
- Limited software support and updates
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1070 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Yezz Art 1 Pro. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Art 1 Pro’s display specifications are unavailable, it’s likely to utilize a less advanced panel technology. The Pixel 7a’s display is also likely to have superior color accuracy and viewing angles, enhancing the overall visual experience. The absence of LTPO on either device suggests neither offers adaptive refresh rates for power saving.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a excels in camera capabilities, leveraging Google’s renowned computational photography. While specific sensor details are not provided, the Pixel 7a’s image processing algorithms are a major advantage, delivering excellent dynamic range, detail, and low-light performance. The Yezz Art 1 Pro’s camera system is likely to be far more basic, with limited image processing capabilities. The Pixel 7a’s video recording capabilities are also expected to be superior, offering features like 4K recording and advanced stabilization. Ignoring the likely presence of low-resolution auxiliary cameras on the Art 1 Pro, the Pixel 7a’s focus on a strong primary sensor and software optimization provides a clear advantage.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2, built on a 5nm process, features a tri-cluster configuration with high-performance Cortex-X1 cores, offering a significant leap in CPU and GPU capabilities compared to the Yezz Art 1 Pro’s MediaTek Helio A25 (12nm). The Helio A25’s Cortex-A53 cores, while efficient, are significantly less powerful. This difference is particularly noticeable in demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, and multitasking. The Tensor G2 also benefits from dedicated AI processing units, enabling features like Magic Eraser and improved voice recognition. The Pixel 7a’s likely use of faster LPDDR5x RAM further enhances performance, while the Art 1 Pro likely uses slower LPDDR4X.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, indicating good battery life despite not having a massive capacity. It supports 18W wired charging with PD3.0 and 7.5W wireless charging, offering convenient charging options. The Yezz Art 1 Pro, with only 10W wired charging and PD, will likely take significantly longer to charge. While the Art 1 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, the Pixel 7a’s more efficient chipset and optimized software contribute to its longer endurance, even with a potentially similar battery size. The addition of wireless charging on the Pixel 7a is a notable convenience feature absent on the Art 1 Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the Yezz Art 1 Pro if you need a basic, functional smartphone for essential tasks like calls, texts, and light web browsing, and your budget is extremely limited. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prioritize camera quality, smooth performance for demanding apps, and access to Google’s AI-powered features, and are willing to invest in a more capable device.