The smartphone market is brimming with options, especially in the budget segment. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the XOLO Q2100, a budget-friendly offering, and the Samsung Galaxy F52 5G, bringing 5G connectivity to the affordable space. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to see which phone reigns supreme.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy F52 5G is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 750G chipset, 5G connectivity, and superior display and camera capabilities significantly outperform the XOLO Q2100's older, less powerful hardware. While the XOLO is cheaper, the F52 offers much better value.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 28, 41, 78 Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2014, September. Released 2014, September | 2021, May 20 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, June 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 152.4 x 75 x 9.3 mm (6.00 x 2.95 x 0.37 in) | 164.6 x 76.3 x 8.7 mm (6.48 x 3.00 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~73.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6582 (28 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-400MP2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 4.4 (KitKat) | Android 11, One UI 3.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDHC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 8GB 1GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 2 MP | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 25W wired |
| Stand-by | Up to 777 h (2G) / Up to 604 h (3G) | - |
| Talk time | Up to 27 h (2G) / Up to 22 h (3G) | - |
| Type | Li-Po 2800 mAh, removable | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White | White, Black |
| Models | - | SM-E5260 |
| Price | - | About 260 EUR |
| SAR | 0.68 W/kg (head) 0.56 W/kg (body) | - |
XOLO Q2100
- Very Affordable
- Decent Battery Life (potentially)
- Compact Size (likely)
- Outdated Chipset
- Low Performance
- Basic Camera
- No 5G
Samsung Galaxy F52 5G
- 5G Connectivity
- Powerful Snapdragon 750G
- Better Camera
- Superior Display
- Faster Charging
- More Expensive than XOLO Q2100
- May have limited storage options (depending on variant)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy F52 5G likely boasts a superior display, potentially an AMOLED panel with vibrant colors and deeper blacks, compared to the XOLO Q2100's likely LCD display. Resolution and brightness are also expected to be higher on the Samsung.
Camera Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy F52 5G is expected to have a more capable camera system, likely with higher resolution sensors and better image processing. Features like optical image stabilization (OIS) are also more probable on the Samsung, resulting in sharper photos and videos.
Performance
The Snapdragon 750G in the Galaxy F52 5G is a significant upgrade over the Mediatek MT6582 in the XOLO Q2100. Expect noticeably faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the Samsung. The octa-core processor and 8nm process offer a substantial advantage.
Battery Life
While both phones likely have similar battery capacities (around 4000-5000mAh), the Samsung's more efficient chipset should translate to better battery life in real-world usage. The 25W wired charging on the Samsung is also a faster charging solution.
Buying Guide
The XOLO Q2100 is best suited for users on an extremely tight budget who prioritize affordability above all else and don't need 5G. The Samsung Galaxy F52 5G is ideal for those seeking a modern smartphone experience with 5G, a better camera, and smoother performance, even on a budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the XOLO Q2100 worth buying in 2024?
Only if you're on an extremely tight budget and don't need 5G or high performance. Otherwise, there are better options available.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy F52 5G support 5G in all regions?
5G support depends on your carrier and region. Check compatibility before purchasing.
❓ What is the typical battery life of the Samsung Galaxy F52 5G?
Expect a full day of moderate use, potentially longer with optimized settings. The 5000mAh battery and efficient chipset contribute to good battery life.
