XOLO Q2100 vs Micromax In Note 1: A Detailed Comparison

The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for money. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the XOLO Q2100 and the Micromax In Note 1. Both promise affordability, but which one delivers the better overall experience?

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Micromax In Note 1 is the clear winner. Its significantly more powerful chipset, improved camera, faster charging, and modern features like reverse charging make it a superior choice despite potentially a slightly higher price. The XOLO Q2100 is a basic option for those on a very tight budget.

PHONES
Phone Names	XOLO Q2100	Micromax In note 1

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 900 / 2100	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands	-	1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41
Speed	HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps	HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat7 300/150 Mbps
Technology	GSM / HSPA	GSM / HSPA / LTE

Launch
Announced	2014, September. Released 2014, September	2020, November 03. Released 2020, November 24
Status	Discontinued	Discontinued

Body
Dimensions	152.4 x 75 x 9.3 mm (6.00 x 2.95 x 0.37 in)	165.2 x 77 x 9 mm (6.50 x 3.03 x 0.35 in)
SIM	Dual SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	-	196 g (6.91 oz)

Display
Protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 3	Oleophobic coating
Resolution	720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~267 ppi density)	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)
Size	5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~73.0% screen-to-body ratio)	6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	IPS LCD	IPS LCD, 450 nits (peak)

Platform
CPU	Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7	Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
Chipset	Mediatek MT6582 (28 nm)	Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
GPU	Mali-400MP2	Mali-G52 MC2
OS	Android 4.4 (KitKat)	Android 10

Memory
Card slot	microSDHC	microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal	8GB 1GB RAM	64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM
	-	eMMC 5.1

Main Camera
Features	Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR	LED flash, HDR
Quad	-	48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Single	8 MP, AF	-
Video	1080p@30fps	1080p@30fps

Selfie camera
Single	2 MP	16 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
Video	-	1080p@30fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	Yes	Yes
35mm jack	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker	Yes	Yes

Comms
Bluetooth	4.0, A2DP	5.0, A2DP, LE
NFC	No	No
Positioning	GPS	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Radio	FM radio	FM radio
USB	microUSB 2.0, OTG	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass

Battery
Charging	-	18W wired 2.5W reverse wired
Stand-by	Up to 777 h (2G) / Up to 604 h (3G)	-
Talk time	Up to 27 h (2G) / Up to 22 h (3G)	-
Type	Li-Po 2800 mAh, removable	Li-Po 5000 mAh

Misc
Colors	Black, White	Green, White
Models	-	E7746
Price	-	About 130 EUR
SAR	0.68 W/kg (head) 0.56 W/kg (body)	0.57 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body)

XOLO Q2100

Extremely affordable
Compact size (likely)
Basic functionality

Outdated chipset
Low performance
Poor camera quality
No fast charging
Low resolution display

Micromax In note 1

Powerful Helio G85 chipset
Good camera system
Fast charging (18W)
Reverse wired charging
Larger, higher-resolution display
Modern features

Potentially slightly higher price
May lack premium build materials

Display Comparison

The Micromax In Note 1 typically features a larger display (around 6.67 inches) with a higher resolution (FHD+) compared to the XOLO Q2100 (likely a smaller, lower-resolution display). This translates to a more immersive viewing experience and sharper visuals on the In Note 1. Color accuracy and brightness are also likely to be better on the Micromax.

Camera Comparison

The Micromax In Note 1 generally boasts a more versatile and higher-resolution camera system. While specific megapixel counts vary, the In Note 1 likely includes features like a dedicated macro lens and improved image processing algorithms. The XOLO Q2100's camera is likely adequate for basic snapshots but won't match the In Note 1's capabilities.

Performance

This is where the Micromax In Note 1 truly shines. The Helio G85 chipset is significantly faster and more efficient than the XOLO Q2100's MT6582. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the In Note 1. The octa-core CPU and newer manufacturing process (12nm vs 28nm) contribute to this advantage.

Battery Life

Both phones likely offer decent battery life, but the Micromax In Note 1's more efficient chipset and potentially larger battery capacity (around 5000mAh) give it an edge. The 18W fast charging on the In Note 1 is a significant advantage over the XOLO Q2100, which likely lacks fast charging support. The reverse charging capability on the In Note 1 is a bonus.

Buying Guide

The XOLO Q2100 is best suited for users who prioritize extreme affordability above all else and need a basic phone for calls, texts, and very light usage. The Micromax In Note 1 is ideal for students, first-time smartphone users, or anyone seeking a reliable and feature-rich phone without breaking the bank.