Xiaomi Redmi Watch 2 vs. Poco Watch: A Detailed Comparison

Xiaomi's smartwatch lineup continues to expand, offering options for various budgets and needs. The Redmi Watch 2 and Poco Watch are two contenders vying for your wrist. But which one truly stands out? This comprehensive comparison will break down their features, performance, and overall value.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Poco Watch generally edges out the Redmi Watch 2 with its slightly more modern design and potentially better integration with the wider Xiaomi ecosystem. However, the Redmi Watch 2 might offer a more budget-friendly entry point, depending on pricing and availability. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your priorities.

PHONES
Phone Names Xiaomi Redmi Watch 2 Xiaomi Poco Watch
Network
2G bandsN/AN/A
3G bandsN/AN/A
4G bandsN/AN/A
EDGENoNo
GPRSNoNo
SpeedNoNo
TechnologyNo cellular connectivityNo cellular connectivity
 -No
Launch
Announced2021, October 282022, April 26
StatusAvailable. Released 2021, November 11Available. Released 2022, April 28
Body
BuildPlastic back, plastic framePlastic back, plastic frame
Dimensions39.1 x 34.4 x 10 mm (1.54 x 1.35 x 0.39 in)39.1 x 34.4 x 10 mm (1.54 x 1.35 x 0.39 in)
SIMNoNo
Weight31 g (1.09 oz)31 g (1.09 oz)
 Waterproof (5ATM) 50m water resistantWaterproof (5ATM) 50m water resistant
Display
Resolution360 x 320 pixels (~301 ppi density)360 x 320 pixels (~301 ppi density)
Size1.6 inches1.6 inches
TypeAMOLEDAMOLED
Platform
OSProprietary OSProprietary OS
Memory
Card slotNoNo
InternalUnspecified storageUnspecified storage
Sound
3.5mm jack NoNo
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker NoNo
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCYesUnspecified
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioNoNo
USBNoNo
WLANNoNo
Features
SensorsAccelerometer, heart rate, compass, SpO2Accelerometer, heart rate, compass, SpO2
Battery
TypeLi-Ion 225 mAhLi-Ion 225 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, Blue, IvoryBlack, Blue, Ivory
ModelsM2102W1-
PriceAbout 60 EURAbout 90 EUR
Camera
 No-

Xiaomi Redmi Watch 2

  • Likely more affordable
  • Basic fitness tracking features
  • Decent battery life

  • Potentially older design
  • Limited app ecosystem
  • May lack advanced features

Xiaomi Poco Watch

  • Potentially more modern design
  • Possible better app integration
  • Slightly improved performance

  • Likely more expensive
  • Still limited compared to high-end smartwatches
  • Battery life may not be significantly better

Display Comparison

Both watches likely feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and good visibility. The Poco Watch might have a slightly larger display or a more refined bezel design, contributing to a more premium look. Expect similar resolution and brightness levels.

Camera Comparison

Neither watch is expected to have a built-in camera. They will rely on smartphone connectivity for taking photos.

Performance

Performance will largely depend on the chipset used. Both are likely to handle basic smartwatch functions smoothly, but the Poco Watch might offer slightly faster app loading times or smoother animations due to potentially more efficient hardware. Expect both to be adequate for fitness tracking.

Battery Life

Battery life is a crucial factor. Both watches likely offer around 5-7 days of typical usage. The Poco Watch might have a slightly larger battery capacity, potentially extending its battery life under heavy use.

Buying Guide

The Xiaomi Redmi Watch 2 is ideal for budget-conscious users seeking basic fitness tracking and smartwatch functionality. The Poco Watch is a better choice for those who prioritize a more stylish design, potentially better app integration, and are willing to spend a bit more.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ What is the difference between the Redmi Watch 2 and the Poco Watch?
The Poco Watch generally has a more modern design and potentially better app integration. The Redmi Watch 2 is likely more budget-friendly.
❓ Which watch is better for fitness tracking?
Both offer basic fitness tracking. Performance will be similar, but the Poco Watch might have slightly more accurate sensors.