Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs Poco F5 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 emerges as the better value. Its Dimensity 8400 Ultra offers comparable, and in some cases superior, performance to the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Poco F5 Pro, coupled with significantly faster 90W charging. While the F5 Pro boasts a slightly brighter display, the Turbo 4’s overall package is more compelling.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 | Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January 02 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January 02 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161 x 75.2 x 8.1 mm (6.34 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203.5 g (7.20 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 1400 nits (HBM), 3200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-A725 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A725 & 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A725) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8400 Ultra (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | G720 MC7 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/4" | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 45 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min 30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6550 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Blue | Black, White |
| Models | 24129RT7CC | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 270 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9) GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4
- Faster 90W charging for quicker top-ups
- More modern Dimensity 8400 Ultra chipset for potentially better performance and efficiency
- Likely better thermal management due to newer chipset architecture
- Display specifications are unknown, potentially lacking the brightness of the F5 Pro
- Camera details are missing, making it difficult to assess image quality
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Brighter display (1059 nits) for better outdoor visibility
- Wireless charging support for added convenience
- Established Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 platform with known performance characteristics
- Slower 67W wired charging compared to the Turbo 4
- Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is prone to throttling under sustained load
- Potentially less future-proof chipset compared to the Dimensity 8400 Ultra
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro’s display reaches a measured peak brightness of 1059 nits, providing excellent visibility in direct sunlight. However, the Redmi Turbo 4’s display specifications are not provided, making a direct brightness comparison difficult. Both devices feature an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of OLED panels. Without knowing the Turbo 4’s panel technology (LTPO or not), it’s hard to assess power efficiency differences. The F5 Pro’s higher peak brightness is its clear advantage, but real-world differences may be minimal for typical use.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Without knowing sensor sizes, aperture values, or the presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), a meaningful comparison is impossible. The absence of detail suggests neither phone is positioned as a dedicated camera powerhouse, focusing instead on overall value. We can assume both will offer competent image capture in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance is uncertain.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Redmi Turbo 4’s Mediatek Dimensity 8400 Ultra (4nm) features a unique CPU configuration with a 1x3.25 GHz Cortex-A725, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A725, and 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A725 cores. The Poco F5 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) with a 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510 configuration. While clock speeds are comparable, the Dimensity 8400 Ultra’s newer architecture generally translates to improved efficiency and sustained performance. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known to throttle under prolonged heavy load, while the Dimensity 8400 Ultra is expected to manage thermals more effectively. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but specific speeds are not provided.
Battery Life
Both the Redmi Turbo 4 and Poco F5 Pro achieve an endurance rating of 99 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite unspecified battery capacities. However, charging speeds differ significantly. The Turbo 4 supports 90W wired charging, promising a full charge in 45 minutes, while the F5 Pro is limited to 67W wired (50% in 15 minutes), 30W wireless (50% in 32 minutes). The Turbo 4’s faster charging is a substantial advantage for users who prioritize quick top-ups. The inclusion of wireless charging on the F5 Pro is a bonus, but the slower speeds may not be as convenient as the Turbo 4’s rapid wired charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 if you prioritize raw performance for gaming and demanding applications, and value incredibly fast charging speeds. You'll benefit from a more modern chipset and a quicker top-up time. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro if you prefer a slightly brighter display and potentially wider availability, and are comfortable with a slower charging experience. It remains a capable performer, but the Turbo 4 offers a more future-proof platform.