Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and rapid charging, the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8400 Ultra significantly outperforms the Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo offers excellent battery endurance and a brighter display, making it a strong contender for those valuing longevity and visual clarity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January 02 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January 02 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161 x 75.2 x 8.1 mm (6.34 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203.5 g (7.20 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 1400 nits (HBM), 3200 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-A725 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A725 & 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A725) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8400 Ultra (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | G720 MC7 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/4" | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 45 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6550 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Blue | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | 24129RT7CC | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 8400 Ultra)
- Ultra-fast 90W wired charging
- Potentially better gaming performance
- Battery life potentially lower than Edge 40 Neo
- Display brightness likely lower than Edge 40 Neo
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
- Bright and vibrant display (1073 nits)
- Balanced performance for everyday tasks
- Slower processor (Dimensity 7030)
- Slower charging speed (68W)
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits, which translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight. While the Redmi Turbo 4’s display specifications are not provided, the Edge 40 Neo’s panel offers a noticeable advantage in outdoor scenarios. The Edge 40 Neo’s display technology is likely OLED, providing excellent contrast and color accuracy, though the Turbo 4 may also utilize OLED. The lack of refresh rate information for the Turbo 4 makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness is a clear win.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications for both devices are limited. However, given the market positioning, it’s reasonable to assume the Motorola Edge 40 Neo will focus on image processing and software enhancements to deliver pleasing results. The Redmi Turbo 4, with its performance advantage, may offer faster image processing and potentially better video recording capabilities. Without sensor size or aperture information, a definitive camera comparison is impossible, but the Turbo 4’s processing power gives it an edge in computational photography.
Performance
The Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4’s Mediatek Dimensity 8400 Ultra, built on a 4nm process, represents a substantial leap in performance over the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 (6nm). The 8400 Ultra’s CPU configuration – 1x3.25 GHz Cortex-A725, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A725, and 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A725 – is significantly more powerful than the Edge 40 Neo’s 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience. The 4nm node also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 is still capable, but it’s geared towards efficient performance rather than outright speed.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery endurance, achieving an impressive 10:28h of active use and an 80-hour endurance rating. While the Redmi Turbo 4’s battery capacity is unknown, its 90W wired charging is a significant advantage, allowing a full charge in just 45 minutes. The Edge 40 Neo’s 68W charging, reaching 50% in 15 minutes, is respectable but slower. The Turbo 4’s faster charging mitigates concerns about potential battery drain from its more powerful processor, offering a quicker path to a full charge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 if you need uncompromising performance for gaming, demanding applications, or future-proofing. Its 90W charging is a game-changer for minimizing downtime. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prefer a phone with all-day battery life, a vibrant display for media consumption, and a more refined, balanced user experience. It’s ideal for everyday users who don’t require the absolute highest processing power.