Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 3 vs OnePlus Ace 3 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the OnePlus Ace 3 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 offers a noticeable performance uplift, and the 100W charging is significantly quicker. However, the Redmi Turbo 3 presents a strong value proposition for budget-conscious gamers and those who don't need the absolute fastest speeds.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 3 | OnePlus Ace 3 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 10 | 2024, June 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 10 | Available. Released 2024, July 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 160.5 x 74.4 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 163.3 x 75.3 x 8.7 / 8.9 / 9.0 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 207 g, 212 g, 225 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 2400 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 800 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS | Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, PD3.0, QC3+ | 100W wired, PD2.0, QC2, 52% in 15 min, 100% in 36 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 6100 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Titanium, Harry Potter | Gray, White, Green |
| Models | 24069RA21C | PJX110 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 410 EUR |
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 3
- More affordable price point
- Excellent performance for the price
- Supports PD3.0 and QC3+ fast charging standards
- Slower charging compared to the Ace 3 Pro
- Less powerful chipset than the Ace 3 Pro
OnePlus Ace 3 Pro
- Flagship-level performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Ultra-fast 100W charging (0-100% in 36 minutes)
- Likely superior camera system
- Higher price tag
- May run slightly warmer under sustained load
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature high-refresh-rate AMOLED panels (data not provided), the core difference lies in the processing power driving them. The focus here is on the chipset's ability to render graphics smoothly. The Redmi Turbo 3's Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 will deliver excellent visuals, but the Ace 3 Pro's 8 Gen 3, with its more powerful GPU, will handle demanding games at higher settings with greater consistency. We anticipate both will have excellent color accuracy, but the Ace 3 Pro's superior processing power could translate to better HDR performance.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, it's difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, given the positioning of these devices, we can infer that the Ace 3 Pro likely features a more sophisticated camera system. OnePlus typically invests heavily in image processing, and the 8 Gen 3’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is more advanced than the 8s Gen 3’s. This means better noise reduction, dynamic range, and overall image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The Redmi Turbo 3 will still capture good photos, but the Ace 3 Pro is expected to offer a more refined and versatile camera experience.
Performance
The OnePlus Ace 3 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (3.3 GHz peak clock speed) demonstrably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 3’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (3.0 GHz). The 8 Gen 3 features a more advanced CPU architecture – specifically, a higher clock speed on the Cortex-X4 prime core – resulting in faster single-core performance. The Ace 3 Pro also benefits from a slightly more efficient Cortex-A720 cluster (3x 3.2 GHz vs 4x 2.8 GHz on the Turbo 3). Both utilize the same 4nm process, but the architectural improvements in the 8 Gen 3 translate to a tangible performance advantage, particularly in sustained workloads. The Turbo 3, however, remains a very capable performer, and the difference won't be noticeable in everyday tasks.
Battery Life
The OnePlus Ace 3 Pro’s 100W charging is a significant advantage, achieving a full charge in just 36 minutes. The Redmi Turbo 3’s 90W charging is still fast, but noticeably slower. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging of the Ace 3 Pro effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The Ace 3 Pro also supports PD2.0 and QC2, while the Turbo 3 supports PD3.0 and QC3+, suggesting broader compatibility with different chargers, but the speed difference is the key factor here.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 3 if you need a powerful gaming experience without breaking the bank, and are comfortable with slightly slower charging speeds. It’s ideal for users who prioritize value and don’t require the absolute peak performance. Buy the OnePlus Ace 3 Pro if you prefer uncompromising performance, the fastest possible charging, and are willing to pay a premium for the latest Snapdragon chipset. This phone is geared towards power users and mobile gamers demanding the best.