The budget tablet market is heating up, and the Xiaomi Redmi Pad and Honor Pad 8 are two strong contenders. Both offer impressive features for their price point, but which one comes out on top? We're diving deep into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi Pad edges out the Honor Pad 8 thanks to its slightly brighter display and more powerful chipset. However, the Honor Pad 8 boasts faster charging and a competitive price, making it a solid alternative. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your priorities.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 3G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 4G bands | N/A | N/A |
| EDGE | N/A | No |
| GPRS | N/A | No |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 04 | 2022, July 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 05 | Available. Released 2022, July 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 250.5 x 158.1 x 7.1 mm (9.86 x 6.22 x 0.28 in) | 278.5 x 174.1 x 6.9 mm (10.96 x 6.85 x 0.27 in) |
| SIM | No | No |
| Weight | 465 g (1.03 lb) | 520 g (1.15 lb) |
| | - | Stylus support |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~220 ppi density) | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~194 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.61 inches, 320.4 cm2 (~80.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 12.0 inches, 409.9 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 350 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 5 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.3, 105° (ultrawide) | 5 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (8 speakers) |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 22.5W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 8000 mAh | Li-Po 7250 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Graphite Gray, Moonlight Silver, Mint Green | Dark Blue, Gold, Mint |
| Models | 22081283G | HEY-W09 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 330 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.36 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1529:1 (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: 1468:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-23.9 LUFS (Very good)
|
-22.7 LUFS (Excellent)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 319077 (v9)
GeekBench: 1852 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 279242 (v9)
GeekBench: 1545 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 7.3fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
- Slightly brighter display
- More powerful chipset (Helio G99)
- Good value for performance
- Slower charging (18W)
- Potential software bloat (Xiaomi UI)
Honor Pad 8
- Faster charging (22.5W)
- Competitive price
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Slightly dimmer display
- Less powerful chipset (Snapdragon 680)
Display Comparison
Both tablets feature LCD displays with respectable contrast ratios. The Redmi Pad takes a slight lead with a measured peak brightness of 402 nits compared to the Honor Pad 8's 392 nits, resulting in a marginally better viewing experience, especially in brighter environments. Resolution is likely similar (around 2000x1200), offering decent sharpness for tablet use.
Camera Comparison
Camera quality on budget tablets is rarely a highlight. Both devices likely feature modest rear cameras (around 8MP) and front-facing cameras (around 5-8MP). Expect acceptable image quality for video calls and casual snapshots, but don't expect flagship-level performance. Detailed camera comparisons would require testing, but neither is expected to excel.
Performance
The Redmi Pad's Mediatek Helio G99 chipset generally outperforms the Honor Pad 8's Snapdragon 680 4G. The G99's Cortex-A76 cores provide a noticeable boost in CPU performance, making the Redmi Pad feel snappier for multitasking and demanding apps. Gaming performance should also be better on the Redmi Pad.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is likely similar (around 8000mAh). While the Redmi Pad has a slightly larger battery, the Honor Pad 8's 22.5W charging offers a faster charging experience compared to the Redmi Pad's 18W charging. This means you'll spend less time plugged in to top up the Honor Pad 8.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi Pad is ideal for users prioritizing performance and a vibrant display for media consumption. The Honor Pad 8 is a great pick for those seeking a reliable tablet with faster charging and a slightly more budget-friendly price tag, especially for casual use and entertainment.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which tablet is better for gaming?
The Xiaomi Redmi Pad is generally better for gaming due to its more powerful chipset.
❓ Does the Honor Pad 8 support 5G?
No, the Honor Pad 8 is a 4G-only device.
❓ What is the storage capacity of each tablet?
Both tablets typically offer configurations with 4GB or 6GB of RAM and 64GB or 128GB of storage, expandable via microSD card.
❓ Which tablet has better software support?
Xiaomi's MIUI can be feature-rich but sometimes includes bloatware. Honor's software is generally cleaner, but long-term update support can vary.