The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (India) and Nokia 7.2 represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Redmi Note 9 Pro prioritizes processing power with a newer chipset, while the Nokia 7.2 aims for a balanced experience with a focus on build quality and software simplicity. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (India) is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 720G chipset delivers significantly improved performance, making it more suitable for gaming and demanding applications. While the Nokia 7.2 offers a slightly brighter display, the Redmi Note 9 Pro’s superior battery endurance and processing power outweigh this advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - ROW |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - ROW |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps or LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - IN |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, March 12. Released 2020, March 17 | 2019, September 05. Released 2019, September 23 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.8 x 76.7 x 8.8 mm (6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 159.9 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| | Water-repellent coating | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, Android One |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes (excl. India) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5020 mAh | Li-Po 3500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Aurora Blue, Glacier White, Interstellar Black | Cyan Green, Charcoal, Ice |
| Models | M2003J6A1I | TA-1193, TA-1178, TA-1196, TA-1181 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 240 EUR |
| SAR | 0.90 W/kg (head) 0.48 W/kg (body) | 1.15 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.44 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 128GB 4GB RAM | ₹ 14,499 | - |
| 64GB 4GB RAM | ₹ 14,499 | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.0dB / Crosstalk -93.4dB |
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 127h
|
Endurance rating 69h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1389:1 (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: 1342:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-27.8 LUFS (Good)
|
-29.6 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 254000 (v8)
GeekBench: 1785 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 26fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 139495 (v7), 164484 (v8)
GeekBench: 5440 (v4.4), 1398 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 8.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (India)
- Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 720G)
- Much longer battery life (127h endurance)
- Faster charging (18W)
- Display peak brightness is lower than Nokia 7.2
- Software experience may be less clean than Nokia's
Nokia 7.2
- Brighter display (585 nits)
- Cleaner software experience (Android One)
- More understated design
- Significantly slower processor (Snapdragon 660)
- Much shorter battery life (69h endurance)
- Slower charging (10W)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature displays with similar contrast ratios – 1389:1 for the Redmi Note 9 Pro and 1342:1 for the Nokia 7.2. However, the Nokia 7.2 boasts a measured peak brightness of 585 nits, exceeding the Redmi Note 9 Pro’s unspecified peak brightness. This suggests better outdoor visibility on the Nokia 7.2. While both offer adequate viewing experiences, the Nokia 7.2’s higher brightness is a tangible advantage for users frequently exposed to direct sunlight. The Redmi Note 9 Pro’s display tech is not specified, while the Nokia 7.2’s is assumed to be IPS LCD, typical for its price range.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the Redmi Note 9 Pro’s focus on overall specifications, it’s reasonable to assume a more advanced camera system. The Nokia 7.2’s camera likely prioritizes natural color reproduction, consistent with Nokia’s brand image, while the Redmi Note 9 Pro may lean towards more vibrant, processed images. The absence of detailed specs makes a definitive judgment impossible, but the Redmi Note 9 Pro’s overall hardware advantage suggests a potentially superior camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Redmi Note 9 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G, fabricated on an efficient 8nm process. This translates to a significant performance advantage over the Nokia 7.2’s Snapdragon 660 (14nm). The 720G’s octa-core CPU (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) outperforms the 660’s (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) in both single-core and multi-core tasks. The 8nm process also contributes to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Redmi Note 9 Pro is the clear winner for users prioritizing speed and responsiveness.
Battery Life
Battery life is a significant differentiator. The Redmi Note 9 Pro achieves an endurance rating of 127 hours, substantially exceeding the Nokia 7.2’s 69 hours. This difference is attributable to the more efficient Snapdragon 720G chipset and potentially a larger battery capacity (unspecified for the Redmi Note 9 Pro). While the Redmi Note 9 Pro charges at 18W, the Nokia 7.2 is limited to 10W. This means the Redmi Note 9 Pro will recharge faster, minimizing downtime. The Redmi Note 9 Pro’s superior battery life is a major advantage for users who heavily rely on their smartphones throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (India) if you need a phone capable of handling modern games, multitasking, and benefit from a longer-lasting battery. It’s ideal for users who prioritize performance and value. Buy the Nokia 7.2 if you prefer a cleaner software experience, a slightly brighter display, and a more understated design, and are willing to compromise on processing power and battery life.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 720G in the Redmi Note 9 Pro handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 720G is a capable chipset for gaming. It can comfortably run PUBG Mobile at high settings with stable frame rates. The 8nm process also helps to minimize thermal throttling, ensuring sustained performance during long gaming sessions.
❓ How much faster is the Redmi Note 9 Pro's charging compared to the Nokia 7.2?
The Redmi Note 9 Pro supports 18W fast charging, while the Nokia 7.2 is limited to 10W. This means the Redmi Note 9 Pro will charge significantly faster, reducing the time spent plugged into the wall. While exact 0-100% times aren't specified, expect a noticeable difference in charging speed.
❓ Is the Nokia 7.2's Android One software a significant advantage for software updates?
Android One guarantees at least two years of OS updates and three years of security patches. This is a benefit over Xiaomi's MIUI, which, while feature-rich, can sometimes have a less predictable update schedule. However, Xiaomi has improved its update commitment in recent years.
