The Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 and Motorola Edge 50 Fusion represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a balanced experience, they diverge significantly in chipset choice and charging capabilities, creating a clear distinction for potential buyers. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a brighter display, the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion emerges as the stronger contender. Its 68W charging significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 15’s 45W, and the measured 1322 nits brightness provides superior outdoor visibility. However, the Redmi Note 15 offers a potentially more efficient chipset.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 71 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | Not announced yet | 2024, April 16 |
| Status | Rumored | Available. Released 2024, May 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, silicone polymer back (eco leather), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.4 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.29 in) | 161.9 x 73.1 x 7.9 mm (6.37 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 178 g (6.28 oz) | 174.9 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.83 inches, 112.6 cm2 (~91.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, PWM, HDR10+, 3200 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz (LATAM), 144Hz (INT), 1600 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) - InternationalOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - LATAM |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) - InternationalQualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) - LATAM |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.4", 1.0µm
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (wide), 1/4.0", 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5520 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glacier Blue, Purple, Black | Forest Blue, Marshmallow Blue, Hot Pink |
| Models | 25096RA9BG | XT2429-1 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | € 208.99 / $ 245.00 / ₹ 18,667 |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15
- Potentially more efficient Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 chipset
- 4nm process for improved thermal management
- Likely competitive pricing
- Slower 45W charging
- Display brightness likely lower than Edge 50 Fusion
- Camera specifications currently unknown
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
- Significantly faster 68W charging (50% in 15 min)
- Brighter 1322 nits display
- Potentially more powerful Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (International version)
- LATAM version uses Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, reducing performance
- Higher performance may lead to faster battery drain
- Camera details currently limited
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1322 nits, making it far more usable in direct sunlight compared to the Redmi Note 15 (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize OLED panels given the market segment, the Fusion’s peak brightness is a clear advantage. The Redmi Note 15’s display specifications are currently unknown, but it’s unlikely to match the Fusion’s luminance. Bezels and color accuracy are also unknown for the Redmi Note 15, but the Fusion is expected to deliver a modern, immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Camera details for the Redmi Note 15 are currently unavailable. The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion’s camera specifications are also missing, making a direct comparison difficult. However, given the price point, both phones likely feature a primary sensor around the 50MP mark. The presence or absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) will be a crucial differentiator, impacting low-light performance and video stabilization. We anticipate both phones will include standard wide and ultrawide lenses, but detailed aperture and sensor size information is needed for a comprehensive assessment. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality.
Performance
The performance landscape is more complex. The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, in its international variant, features the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm), a step up from the Redmi Note 15’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4nm). Both chips utilize an octa-core configuration with 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and varying Cortex-A55 speeds (1.95 GHz for Fusion, 1.8 GHz for Note 15). The 7s Gen 2 generally offers a noticeable performance uplift in GPU-intensive tasks and multitasking. However, the LATAM version of the Edge 50 Fusion downgrades to the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, making the Redmi Note 15 a more competitive option in that region. The 4nm process on both chipsets suggests good thermal efficiency, but the 7s Gen 2’s more powerful GPU may generate more heat under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion shines in the battery and charging department. Its 68W wired charging can deliver a 50% charge in just 15 minutes, a significant advantage over the Redmi Note 15’s 45W charging. The Fusion also boasts an active use battery score of 12:40h, indicating strong real-world endurance. While the Redmi Note 15’s battery capacity is unknown, the slower charging speed suggests it may not compensate for a potentially smaller battery. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2’s higher performance could also lead to faster battery drain under heavy use.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 if you prioritize sustained performance and potentially longer battery life due to the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3’s 4nm process. This phone is ideal for users who engage in moderate gaming and daily tasks. Buy the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion if you value rapid charging, a vibrant display, and are willing to potentially trade some raw processing power for these features. It’s a great choice for content consumers and those who need a quick power boost.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 in the Edge 50 Fusion get noticeably warmer than the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 is a more powerful chip and will likely generate more heat under sustained load. However, both chipsets are built on a 4nm process, which helps with thermal efficiency. The Edge 50 Fusion’s thermal management system will be crucial in mitigating any overheating issues. Expect some throttling during prolonged gaming, but the Fusion should still offer a smoother experience overall.
❓ Is the difference between the international and LATAM versions of the Edge 50 Fusion significant enough to avoid the LATAM model?
Yes, the downgrade from the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 to the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 in the LATAM version is substantial. The 7s Gen 2 offers a significant performance boost in both CPU and GPU tasks. If performance is a priority, it’s highly recommended to opt for the international version of the Edge 50 Fusion, even if it means sourcing it from a different region.
❓ How does the 45W charging on the Redmi Note 15 compare to typical fast charging standards?
45W charging is considered a standard fast charging speed in the mid-range segment, but it's noticeably slower than the 68W charging on the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion. While 45W will still provide a reasonable charging time, it won't offer the same level of convenience as the Fusion's faster charging capabilities.
