Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ vs Motorola Edge 50 Pro: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a brighter display, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro emerges as the winner. Its 125W charging and 11:59h active use battery life offer a tangible advantage, despite the Redmi Note 15 Pro+'s competitive price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ | Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | Not announced yet | 2024, April 03 |
| Status | Rumored | Available. Released 2024, April 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorrila Glass 7i) or silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame | Glass front, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 78.3 x 7.9 mm (6.43 x 3.08 x 0.31 in) | 161.2 x 72.4 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 207 g (7.30 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2712 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~439 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.83 inches, 116.2 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~92.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 3200 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 2000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.7 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7635-AC Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Adreno 720 |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.4, 25mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.0, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, (wide) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 21mm (wide), 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct (/6e is market/region dependent) | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired | 125W wired, 100% in 18 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 6500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Glacier Blue, Mocha Brown, Black | Luxe Lavender, Black Beauty, Moonlight Pearl, Vanilla Cream |
| Models | 2510ERA8BG | XT2403-2 |
| Price | About 500 EUR | € 410.57 / $ 399.00 / £ 369.99 / ₹ 22,995 |
| SAR | - | 1.08 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+
- Potentially lower price point
- Competitive Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 chipset
- 100W fast charging
- Unknown battery capacity
- Display brightness unspecified, likely lower than Edge 50 Pro
- No wireless charging
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
- 125W wired charging (18 min to 100%)
- 50W wireless charging
- 1295 nits peak display brightness
- Potentially higher price
- Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 may offer marginal performance gains
- Higher display brightness may impact battery life
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1295 nits. This is a crucial advantage for outdoor use, where the Redmi Note 15 Pro+’s display brightness remains unspecified. While both utilize 4nm chipsets, the Edge 50 Pro’s brighter panel will consume more power, impacting battery life. Details regarding panel technology (LTPO, refresh rate) are missing for both, but the brightness difference is a clear win for Motorola.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the mid-range positioning of both devices suggests a focus on versatile camera systems rather than groundbreaking innovation. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and apertures makes it difficult to assess image quality. It’s reasonable to assume both will include a primary wide-angle lens, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens, but the quality of these components will be the deciding factor.
Performance
Both phones employ Qualcomm’s 4nm Snapdragon 7-series, but differ in the specific chip. The Redmi Note 15 Pro+ features the SM7635-AC Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, with a core configuration of 1x2.7 GHz Cortex-A720, 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720, and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520. The Edge 50 Pro utilizes the SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, with 1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715, 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715, and 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510. The Edge 50 Pro’s four performance cores (A715) versus the Redmi’s three (A720) suggest a potential edge in multi-threaded tasks, though real-world performance will depend on software optimization. The Redmi's single A720 core is clocked slightly higher, potentially benefiting single-core workloads.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro shines in battery performance, achieving 11:59h of active use. While the Redmi Note 15 Pro+’s battery capacity is unknown, the Edge 50 Pro’s longevity is a significant advantage. Furthermore, the Edge 50 Pro supports 125W wired charging, reaching 100% in just 18 minutes, and includes 50W wireless and 10W reverse wireless charging. The Redmi Note 15 Pro+ offers 100W wired charging, which is still fast, but slower than Motorola’s solution. The addition of wireless charging on the Edge 50 Pro provides added convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ if you need a solid all-rounder with a focus on value and don't mind slightly slower charging. It's ideal for users who prioritize a balanced experience without breaking the bank. Buy the Motorola Edge 50 Pro if you prefer blazing-fast charging, a brighter screen for outdoor visibility, and longer battery life during intensive use – a perfect fit for power users and those constantly on the go.