The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A55 represent two compelling options. The Redmi Note 15 Pro aims to deliver flagship-level performance on a budget with its Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultra, while the Galaxy A55 leverages Samsung’s established brand and software experience alongside the Exynos 1480. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a consistently smooth experience, the Samsung Galaxy A55 emerges as the winner. Its measured 13:27h active use score and refined software outweigh the Redmi Note 15 Pro’s raw processing power, especially considering the slower 25W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | Not announced yet | 2024, March 11 |
| Status | Rumored | Available. Released 2024, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 78.1 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.07 x 0.31 in) | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2712 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~439 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.83 inches, 116.2 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 3200 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultra (4 nm) | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Xclipse 530 |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.5, (wide), 1/1.95", 1.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP, 112˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 6580 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glacier Blue, Gold, Black, Purple | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Models | 25060RABDG | SM-A556V, SM-A556B, SM-A556B/DS, SM-A556E, SM-A556E/DS, SM-A5560 |
| Price | About 400 EUR | $ 324.99 / £ 251.50 / € 319.99 / ₹ 23,998 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro
- Faster 45W wired charging
- Potentially stronger GPU performance for gaming
- Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultra offers competitive processing power
- Battery life likely shorter than Galaxy A55
- Display brightness likely lower than Galaxy A55
- Software experience may not be as refined as Samsung’s
Samsung Galaxy A55
- Exceptional 13:27h active use battery life
- Brighter 1010 nit display for outdoor visibility
- Samsung’s refined software and long-term support
- Slower 25W wired charging
- CPU slightly underclocked compared to Redmi Note 15 Pro
- May be more expensive than the Redmi Note 15 Pro
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A55 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1010 nits, making it far more usable outdoors in direct sunlight compared to the Redmi Note 15 Pro (brightness data unavailable). While both utilize 4nm chipsets, the display’s brightness impacts the overall user experience, especially for media consumption. We expect the Redmi Note 15 Pro to have a standard AMOLED panel, while the A55’s brightness suggests a potentially higher-quality panel, though details on refresh rate and PWM dimming are currently unknown. The A55’s superior brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Redmi Note 15 Pro, a direct comparison is limited. However, given the trend in this price segment, we anticipate the A55’s image processing will prioritize color accuracy and dynamic range, while the Redmi Note 15 Pro might lean towards more vibrant, saturated images. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the A55 is a significant advantage for video recording and low-light photography. The A55’s image processing benefits from Samsung’s extensive camera software expertise, potentially delivering more consistent results across various shooting conditions.
Performance
Both the Redmi Note 15 Pro and Galaxy A55 employ octa-core CPUs with a similar core configuration – four Cortex-A78 performance cores and four Cortex-A55 efficiency cores. However, the Galaxy A55’s cores are clocked slightly higher at 2.75 GHz versus the Redmi Note 15 Pro’s 2.6 GHz. This, combined with the Exynos 1480’s architecture, suggests a marginal CPU performance advantage for the A55 in benchmarks. The Redmi Note 15 Pro’s Dimensity 7400 Ultra, however, may offer a stronger GPU performance, potentially benefiting gaming. Thermal management will be crucial; the 4nm process node on both chips should help, but the A55’s software optimization could play a key role in sustained performance.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A55’s standout feature is its exceptional battery life, achieving 13 hours and 27 minutes of active use. While the Redmi Note 15 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, the A55’s endurance is a significant advantage for power users. Furthermore, the A55’s 25W charging, while slower than the Redmi Note 15 Pro’s 45W, is sufficient to top up the battery overnight. The Redmi Note 15 Pro’s faster charging is beneficial for quick top-ups, but the A55’s longer runtime reduces the need for frequent charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro if you prioritize raw processing power for demanding tasks like video editing or gaming, and are comfortable with potentially shorter battery life and slower charging speeds. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A55 if you value a consistently smooth user experience, exceptional battery endurance, a brighter display, and the reliability of Samsung’s software ecosystem, even if it means sacrificing some peak performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1480 in the Galaxy A55 tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 1480, built on a 4nm process, is generally efficient. Samsung’s software optimization also plays a crucial role in thermal management. While some throttling is possible during extended, graphically intensive gaming, it’s unlikely to be a significant issue for most users. The A55’s larger chassis also aids in heat dissipation.
❓ Is the 45W charging on the Redmi Note 15 Pro significantly faster in real-world use than the 25W charging on the Galaxy A55?
Yes, 45W charging will demonstrably reduce charge times. However, the Galaxy A55’s exceptional battery life means you’ll likely need to charge it less frequently. The Redmi Note 15 Pro’s faster charging is more beneficial for users who frequently need quick top-ups throughout the day.
❓ How does the software experience differ between Xiaomi’s MIUI and Samsung’s One UI?
Samsung’s One UI is generally considered more polished and user-friendly, with a cleaner interface and a stronger focus on stability. Xiaomi’s MIUI offers greater customization options but can sometimes feel cluttered and include pre-installed bloatware. Samsung also provides longer software support commitments.
