Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G vs Google Pixel 7a: A Deep Dive into Performance, Battery, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and charging speed, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G emerges as the winner. Its 120W charging and impressive 50:09h endurance significantly outperform the Pixel 7a, while offering comparable performance for everyday tasks. However, the Pixel 7a retains an edge in camera image processing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January 10 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January 15 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorrila Glass 7i) or silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 74.7 x 8.8 mm (6.40 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 205 g or 210 g (7.23 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 3000 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7635 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (wide), 1/4.0", 0.7µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct (/6e is market/region dependent) | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | 5110 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Lavender Purple, Frost Blue, Midnight Black, Sand Gold | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | 24115RA8EG | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | € 273.90 / $ 349.50 / £ 243.99 | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
| SAR EU | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 50:09h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class C (90 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
- Incredibly fast 120W charging
- Exceptional battery endurance (50:09h)
- Efficient Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 chipset
- Higher peak display brightness
- Camera image processing likely inferior to Pixel 7a
- No wireless charging
Google Pixel 7a
- Excellent camera image quality and processing
- Clean Android experience with guaranteed updates
- Google Tensor G2 excels in AI tasks
- Wireless charging support
- Significantly slower charging speed (18W)
- Lower battery endurance (76h)
- Less efficient chipset
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant displays, but the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 1200 nits, exceeding the Pixel 7a’s 1070 nits. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize OLED panels, the Redmi’s higher brightness and potentially higher PWM dimming rate (data unavailable, but common in Xiaomi’s Pro models) could make it a more comfortable viewing experience for users sensitive to flicker. Bezels appear comparable based on available imagery, and color accuracy is expected to be good on both, though the Pixel benefits from Google’s established display calibration.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s strength lies in its computational photography prowess, leveraging the Tensor G2’s image signal processor (ISP) to deliver consistently excellent photos, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. While the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G’s camera specs are not provided, it's likely to feature a high-resolution main sensor, but the image processing pipeline is unlikely to match Google’s. The Pixel 7a’s video capabilities are also a strong point, offering excellent stabilization and dynamic range. We’ll need to see detailed camera comparisons to assess the Redmi’s performance, but the Pixel 7a holds a clear advantage in software-driven image quality.
Performance
The chipset choice represents a key divergence. The Pixel 7a’s Google Tensor G2 (5nm) prioritizes AI and machine learning tasks, excelling in areas like voice recognition and image processing. However, the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G utilizes the Qualcomm SM7635 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4nm). While the Tensor G2’s Cortex-X1 cores offer higher peak clock speeds (2.85 GHz vs 2.5 GHz), the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3’s more efficient 4nm process and optimized core configuration (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A720, 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720, 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520) provide strong all-around performance and potentially better sustained performance under load. The Pixel 7a’s LPDDR5X RAM is likely faster than the Redmi’s (spec not provided), but the real-world impact will be minimal for most users.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G dominates in battery performance. Its measured endurance of 50:09h and active use score of 10:40h significantly surpass the Pixel 7a’s 76h endurance rating (note: endurance ratings are often based on different testing methodologies, making direct comparison imperfect). Crucially, the Redmi’s 120W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for a full charge in under 20 minutes, compared to the Pixel 7a’s comparatively slow 18W charging with PD3.0. The Pixel 7a does offer 7.5W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Redmi, but the charging speed is significantly slower.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G if you need all-day battery life with incredibly fast charging, and prioritize value for money. You'll benefit from a phone that can quickly top up between uses and withstand heavy daily demands. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prioritize computational photography, a clean Android experience, and seamless integration with the Google ecosystem, even if it means sacrificing battery endurance and charging speed.