Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and sustained performance, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G emerges as the winner. Its significantly superior battery endurance (40:51h vs 80h estimated for the Edge 40 Neo, though the latter is an older rating) and more powerful Dimensity 7300 Ultra chipset outweigh the Motorola’s faster charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January 10 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January 15 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 74.4 x 8.4 mm (6.39 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 3000 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultra (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5110 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Lavender Purple, Coral Green, Midnight Black | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | 24090RA29G | XT2307-1 |
| Price | $ 299.50 / C$ 710.13 / £ 196.90 / € 224.00 | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 40:51h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class C | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
- Exceptional battery life (40:51h endurance)
- More powerful Dimensity 7300 Ultra chipset
- Higher peak display brightness (1138 nits)
- Slower charging speed (45W)
- Camera specifications unknown
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Faster charging (68W, 50% in 15 min)
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Sleek design (based on brand reputation)
- Lower battery endurance (10:28h active use)
- Less powerful Dimensity 7030 chipset
Display Comparison
Both devices feature vibrant displays, with the Redmi Note 14 Pro achieving a measured peak brightness of 1138 nits, slightly surpassing the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 1073 nits. This difference, while not massive, translates to better visibility under direct sunlight for the Xiaomi. While neither specification details refresh rates or panel technology (LTPO), the brightness advantage suggests the Redmi Note 14 Pro may offer a more consistently bright and readable experience. Bezels appear comparable based on available imagery, and color accuracy will require dedicated testing, but the Redmi Note 14 Pro’s higher peak brightness gives it a slight edge.
Camera Comparison
The provided data is limited regarding camera capabilities. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo is explicitly noted for its photo/video capabilities, suggesting a focus on image quality. However, without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, a direct comparison is difficult. We can assume the Edge 40 Neo likely features a more refined image processing pipeline, given Motorola’s history. The Redmi Note 14 Pro’s camera specs are absent, making it impossible to assess its photographic prowess. It’s safe to assume both phones will include a standard suite of lenses, but the Edge 40 Neo’s explicit mention suggests a stronger emphasis on camera performance.
Performance
The chipset is where a significant divergence occurs. The Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G is powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultra (4nm), while the Motorola Edge 40 Neo utilizes the Dimensity 7030 (6nm). The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 7300 Ultra offers superior power efficiency and thermal performance compared to the 6nm Dimensity 7030. Furthermore, the Redmi Note 14 Pro’s CPU configuration (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) boasts a higher clock speed on its prime cores compared to the Edge 40 Neo’s (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). This translates to faster application loading times and smoother multitasking for the Redmi Note 14 Pro. The Edge 40 Neo’s CPU has more efficiency cores, but the Redmi Note 14 Pro’s overall architecture is more geared towards performance.
Battery Life
Battery life is a key differentiator. The Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G boasts an impressive 40:51h endurance rating, indicating exceptional longevity. In active use, it delivers 11:39h of screen-on time. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo, with an older endurance rating of 80h (which should be taken with a grain of salt), achieves 10:28h of active use. While the Edge 40 Neo compensates with 68W wired charging (50% in 15 minutes), the Redmi Note 14 Pro’s superior endurance means fewer charging cycles are needed. The Redmi Note 14 Pro’s 45W charging, while slower, is still adequate, and the longer battery life mitigates the charging speed difference.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G if you need exceptional battery life for all-day use, frequently engage in demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value a processor capable of handling future software updates. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize a sleek design, faster charging speeds for quick top-ups, and a more streamlined software experience, even if it means sacrificing some battery endurance and raw processing power.