Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G vs Oppo Reno8 T 5G: A Deep Dive into Battery, Performance, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and screen visibility, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G emerges as the winner. Its remarkable 52:56h battery endurance and 1500 nits peak brightness outweigh the Reno8 T 5G’s 5G capabilities for those not heavily reliant on next-gen networks.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G | Oppo Reno8 T 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January 10 | 2023, February 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January 16 | Available. Released 2023, February 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), plastic back, aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 74.9 x 8.2 mm (6.39 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) | 162.3 x 74.3 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, Mohs level 5 | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 Ultra (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.4", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired | 67W wired, PD, 100% in 44 min Reverse wired |
| Type | 5500 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Aurora Purple, Ocean Blue | Black Starlight (Midnight Black), Dawn Gold (Sunrise Gold) |
| Models | 24116RACCG | CPH2505 |
| Price | € 179.90 / $ 245.00 / £ 172.99 | About 340 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.80 W/kg (head) 0.98 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 52:56h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G
- Exceptional battery life (52:56h endurance)
- High peak display brightness (1500 nits)
- Long battery lifespan (1000 cycles)
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Slower charging speed (45W)
Oppo Reno8 T 5G
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Ultra-fast 67W charging (100% in 44 min)
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Likely shorter battery life compared to Redmi
- Potentially lower peak display brightness
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G boasts a display capable of reaching a measured 1500 nits of peak brightness, making it exceptionally visible in direct sunlight. While the Reno8 T 5G’s display specs are not provided, the Redmi’s brightness advantage is significant. This is crucial for users who spend considerable time outdoors or in brightly lit environments. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests standard refresh rate management, impacting power consumption but not necessarily visual smoothness.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the market segment suggests both phones will feature multi-camera systems. The Reno8 T 5G’s Snapdragon 695 ISP is likely capable of efficient image processing, but the Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G’s potential sensor size and image processing algorithms remain unknown. Focusing on the main sensor is key, as the inclusion of 2MP macro lenses on either device offers minimal practical benefit.
Performance
Both devices utilize 6nm process nodes, but the chipsets differ significantly. The Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G is powered by the Mediatek Helio G100 Ultra, featuring a Cortex-A76 based CPU core configuration. The Oppo Reno8 T 5G employs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G. While both CPUs have two cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, the Snapdragon 695 benefits from Qualcomm’s optimized architecture and integrated 5G modem. However, the Helio G100’s focus is on maximizing efficiency for sustained performance, potentially offering a smoother experience in less demanding tasks. The 5G modem in the Reno8 T will be a significant benefit for users in areas with 5G coverage.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G truly shines in battery endurance, achieving an impressive 52:56h of total usage and 12:07h of active use. This is coupled with a 45W wired charging solution. In contrast, the Oppo Reno8 T 5G offers 67W wired charging, capable of reaching 100% charge in just 44 minutes, and also includes reverse wired charging. While the Reno8 T’s charging speed is considerably faster, the Redmi Note 14 Pro’s significantly longer battery life may negate the need for frequent top-ups for many users. The Redmi Note 14 Pro also boasts a 1000 cycle battery lifespan, suggesting long-term reliability.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G if you need a phone that will reliably last through two full days of moderate use, and value a bright, easily visible display for outdoor use. Buy the Oppo Reno8 T 5G if you prioritize 5G connectivity for faster data speeds, require rapid charging to minimize downtime, and frequently use features that benefit from a network connection.