Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G vs Motorola Edge 30 Neo: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G is the clear winner. Its remarkable 52:56h endurance rating significantly outpaces the Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s 104h, despite the latter’s faster charging. However, the Edge 30 Neo’s 68W charging and 5W wireless charging offer convenience the Redmi Note 14 Pro lacks.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G | Motorola Edge 30 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January 10 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January 16 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), plastic back, aluminum frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 74.9 x 8.2 mm (6.39 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| - | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 Ultra (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.4", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired | 68W wired 5W wireless |
| Type | 5500 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Aurora Purple, Ocean Blue | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | 24116RACCG | XT2245-1 |
| Price | € 179.90 / $ 245.00 / £ 172.99 | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| SAR EU | 0.80 W/kg (head) 0.98 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 380818 (v9) GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 52:56h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G
- Exceptional battery life (52:56h endurance)
- Brighter display (1500 nits)
- Long battery lifespan (1000 cycles)
- Slower charging (45W)
- Lacks 5G connectivity
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Faster charging (68W wired, 5W wireless)
- Integrated 5G modem
- Potentially more compact design
- Significantly shorter battery life (104h endurance)
- Dimmer display (1004 nits)
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1500 nits, compared to the Edge 30 Neo’s 1004 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Edge 30 Neo claims an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, this is a typical marketing term for OLED panels and doesn't necessarily indicate a superior visual experience. Both devices utilize 6nm chipsets, but the display brightness difference is a tangible benefit for the Redmi Note 14 Pro, especially for media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but the provided data lacks specifics to make a definitive comparison. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, it’s difficult to assess camera quality. We can assume both will offer adequate performance for social media sharing, but enthusiasts will need to consult detailed camera reviews for a more informed opinion. The absence of any mention of advanced features like OIS suggests neither phone is a standout in the camera department.
Performance
Both the Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G and the Motorola Edge 30 Neo employ 6nm chipsets – the Mediatek Helio G100 Ultra and the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, respectively. The Helio G100 Ultra’s Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz offer a slight edge in single-core performance over the Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores, also at 2.2 GHz. However, the Snapdragon 695’s integrated 5G modem provides connectivity the Redmi Note 14 Pro lacks. Real-world performance differences will likely be subtle for everyday tasks, but the Snapdragon 695 may show a slight advantage in sustained workloads due to Qualcomm’s generally more refined thermal management.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G dominates in battery endurance, achieving an impressive 52:56h rating and 12:07h of active use. This is a substantial improvement over the Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s 104h endurance rating. While the Edge 30 Neo compensates with significantly faster 68W wired charging (and 5W wireless), the Redmi Note 14 Pro’s longevity minimizes the need for frequent top-ups. The Redmi Note 14 Pro’s 45W charging is respectable, but slower than the Edge 30 Neo. The Redmi Note 14 Pro also boasts a 1000 cycle battery lifespan, suggesting greater long-term reliability.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G if you need all-day (and then some) battery life and prioritize maximizing time between charges. This phone is ideal for travelers, heavy users, or anyone who dislikes frequent charging. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo if you prefer a faster charging experience and value a more compact form factor, even if it means sacrificing some overall battery endurance. It’s a good fit for users who top up their phones frequently and appreciate the convenience of wireless charging.