Redmi Note 14 5G vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid replenishment, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is the clear winner with its 68W charging and impressive 10:28h battery life in active use. However, the Redmi Note 14 5G offers a potentially lower entry price, making it a viable option for budget-conscious consumers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (China) | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 26 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 26 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 75.7 x 8 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2100 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 Ultra (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.5, (wide), 1/1.96", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Unspecified | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5110 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Green | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | 24094RAD4C | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 140 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (China)
- Potentially lower price point
- MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra offers solid performance
- 6nm process node for efficiency
- Slower 45W charging
- Limited battery life information
- Display specifications currently unknown
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Excellent 10:28h battery life
- Ultra-fast 68W charging (50% in 15 min)
- Bright 1073 nit display
- Potentially higher price
- Dimensity 7030 offers only a marginal performance increase
- Camera details beyond 'Photo/Video' are missing
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits. While the Redmi Note 14 5G’s display specifications are currently unavailable, the Edge 40 Neo’s high peak brightness translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight. The Edge 40 Neo’s panel likely benefits users who frequently consume content outdoors or in brightly lit environments. Without knowing the Redmi Note 14 5G’s panel technology (OLED vs LCD, refresh rate), it’s difficult to assess color accuracy or viewing angles, but the Edge 40 Neo sets a high bar.
Camera Comparison
Camera details for the Redmi Note 14 5G are currently limited. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s camera system, while not detailed in the provided data, is expected to feature a primary sensor with a reasonable aperture for good low-light performance. The absence of sensor size information for either device makes a direct comparison difficult. It’s crucial to note that the inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS). Image processing algorithms will play a significant role in the final image quality, and this is an area where Motorola often differentiates itself.
Performance
Both the Redmi Note 14 5G and the Motorola Edge 40 Neo are powered by octa-core CPUs featuring the same core configuration: 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo utilizes the slightly more advanced MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm) compared to the Redmi Note 14 5G’s Dimensity 7025 Ultra (6nm). While the architectural differences are minimal, the 7030 may offer a marginal performance advantage in sustained workloads. Both devices likely benefit from the 6nm process node, offering a balance between performance and power efficiency. RAM specifications are currently unknown for the Redmi Note 14 5G, but the Edge 40 Neo’s RAM speed (likely LPDDR4x or LPDDR5) will influence application loading times and multitasking performance.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo demonstrably excels in battery performance, achieving 10:28h of active use and an endurance rating of 80 hours. This is a significant advantage over any potential battery life the Redmi Note 14 5G might offer, given the lack of battery capacity information. Furthermore, the Edge 40 Neo’s 68W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 15 minutes, provides a substantial convenience factor. The Redmi Note 14 5G’s 45W charging is respectable, but noticeably slower. The combination of longer battery life and faster charging makes the Edge 40 Neo the superior choice for users who demand all-day power and minimal downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (China) if you need a potentially more affordable 5G experience and aren't heavily reliant on extremely fast charging. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize all-day battery life, significantly faster 68W charging (50% in 15 minutes), and a brighter, more visible display in outdoor conditions.